A Rule-Based Approach to Implicit Emotion Detection in Text

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9103)

Abstract

Most research in the area of emotion detection in written text focused on detecting explicit expressions of emotions in text. In this paper, we present a rule-based pipeline approach for detecting implicit emotions in written text without emotion-bearing words based on the OCC Model. We have evaluated our approach on three different datasets with five emotion categories. Our results show that the proposed approach outperforms the lexicon matching method consistently across all the three datasets by a large margin of 17–30 % in F-measure and gives competitive performance compared to a supervised classifier. In particular, when dealing with formal text which follows grammatical rules strictly, our approach gives an average F-measure of 82.7 % on “Happy”, “Angry-Disgust” and “Sad”, even outperforming the supervised baseline by nearly 17 % in F-measure. Our preliminary results show the feasibility of the approach for the task of implicit emotion detection in written text.

Keywords

Implicit emotions OCC model Emotion detection Rule-based approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Alm, C.O., Roth, D., Sproat, R.: Emotions from text: machine learning for text-based emotion prediction. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 579–586 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekman, P.: An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emot. 6(3–4), 169–200 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Determining the semantic orientation of terms through gloss classification. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 617–624 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedenberg, J., Silverman, G.: Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind. Sage, California (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen, L.K., Arvidsson, A., Nielsen, F.Å., Colleoni, E., Etter, M.: Good friends, bad news-affect and virality in twitter. In: Park, James J., Yang, Laurence T., Lee, Changhoon (eds.) FutureTech 2011, Part II. CCIS, vol. 185, pp. 34–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marsella, S., Gratch, J., Petta, P.: Computational models of emotion. In: Scherer, K.R., Bänziger, T., Roesch, E. (eds.) A Blueprint for Affective Computing: A Sourcebook and Manual, pp. 21–46. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ortony, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polanyi, L., Zaenen, A.: Contextual valence shifters. In: Shanahan, J.G., Qu, Y., Wiebe, J. (eds.) Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. The Information Retrieval Series, pp. 1–10. Springer, Netherlands (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shivhare, S.N., Khethawat, S.: Emotion detection from text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.4944 (2012)
  10. 10.
    Steunebrink, B.R., Dastani, M., Meyer, J.J.C.: The OCC model revisited. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Emotion and Computing, vol. 65, pp. 2047–2056 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strapparava, C., Mihalcea, R.: Semeval-2007 task 14: affective text. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations, SemEval 2007, pp. 70–74 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 347–354. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Applied ScienceAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations