NADIA: A Simplified Approach Towards the Development of Natural Dialogue Systems

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9103)

Abstract

Spoken Dialogue Systems have enormously improved during the last couple of years and gave rise to voice-controlled mobile assistants. While the abilities of these systems are very sophisticated, there is a lack of tools enabling us to easily describe a natural dialogue that can afterwards be processed by a dialogue engine without having to programme the engine itself. In this paper we present NADIA, a dialogue engine that can process an easy to define XML-based dialogue description.

Keywords

Spoken Dialogue Systems Dialogue Modelling Natural Language Generation Voice User Interface 

References

  1. 1.
    Austin, J.L.: How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg, M.: Towards the modelling of backend functionalities in task-oriented dialogue systems. In: 5th Language & Technology Conference: Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, pp. 274–278. Poznań (Poland) (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berg, M.M., Düsterhöft, A., Thalheim, B.: Towards interrogative types in task-oriented dialogue systems. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds.) NLDB 2012. LNCS, vol. 7337, pp. 302–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berg, M., Thalheim, B., Düsterhöft, A.: Dialog acts from the processing perspective in task oriented dialog systems. In: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial 2011). Los Angeles (USA) (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berg, M.M.: NADIA manual (2013). https://github.com/mmberg/nadia/wiki
  6. 6.
    Berg, M.M.: Modelling of Natural Dialogues in the Context of Speech-Based Information and Control Systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kiel, Germany (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berg, M.M., Isard, A., Moore, J.D.: An OpenCCG-based approach to question generation from concepts. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Saraee, M., Sugumaran, V., Vadera, S. (eds.) NLDB 2013. LNCS, vol. 7934, pp. 38–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larsson, S., Berman, A., Bos, J., Grönqvist, L., Ljunglöf, P., Traum, D.: TrindiKit 2.0 Manual. Technical report, University of Gothenburg (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGlashan, S., Burnett, D.C., Carter, J., Danielsen, P., Ferrans, J., Hunt, A., Lucas, B., Porter, B., Rehor, K., Tryphonas, S.: Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) Version 2.0 (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/voicexml20
  10. 10.
    Schalkwyk, J., Beeferman, D., Beaufays, F., Byrne, B., Chelba, C., Cohen, M., Kamvar, M., Strope, B.: Your word is my command: google search by voice: a case study. In: Neustein, A. (ed.) Advances in Speech Recognition: Mobile Environments, Call Centers and Clinics, pp. 61–90. Springer, USA (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Weizenbaum, J.: ELIZA - a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM 9(1), 36–45 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of WismarWismarGermany

Personalised recommendations