Advertisement

Creating Value Through Crowdsourcing: The Antecedent Conditions

  • Michael Rowe
  • Marta Poblet
  • John Douglas Thomson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 218)

Abstract

The benefits of crowdsourcing are becoming more widely understood and there is a methodological move towards organisations using “participatory models” to engage stakeholder communities and align decision making more closely to the needs of stakeholders. Many tasks can now be distributed to “the crowd” for action. Our research aims to understand the antecedent conditions that inform management decisions to adopt crowdsourcing techniques as a means of value creation. Our preliminary findings suggest that to be successful, three antecedent criteria must be met – the task being crowdsourced must be modular in nature, a community of interest must be engaged, and there needs to be a structural capability within the organisation to be able to facilitate the engagement of the crowd and utilise the output from the crowd in a manner that creates value.

Keywords

Crowdsourcing Strategy Open-innovation Online community Social media 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work of Marta Poblet draws from previous research within the framework of the project “Crowdsourcing: instrumentos semánticos para el desarrollo de la participación y la mediación online” (DER 2012- 39492 -C02 -01) by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

References

  1. 1.
    Estellés-Arolas, E., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F.: Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J. Inform. Sci. 38(2), 189–200 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Bus. Horiz. 53(1), 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schenk, E., Guittard, C.: Towards a characterization of crowdsourcing practices. J. Innov. Econ. Manage. 7(1), 93–107 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barbier, G., Zafarani, R., Gao, H., Fung, G., Liu, H.: Maximizing benefits from crowdsourced data. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 18(3), 257–279 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogawa, S., Piller, F.T.: Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 47(2), 65 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q.: Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: current status and future direction. Inform. Syst. Front. 16(3), 417–434 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thuan, N.H., Antunes, P., Johnstone, D.: Factors influencing the decision to crowdsource. In: Antunes, P., Gerosa, M.A., Sylvester, A., Vassileva, J., de Vreede, G.-J. (eds.) CRIWG 2013. LNCS, vol. 8224, pp. 110–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger, P., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge (1967)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eriksson, P., Kovalainen, A.: Qualitative Methods in Business Research. Sage, London (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruner, J.S.: Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raddick, M.J., Bracey, G., Gay, P.L., Lintott, C.J., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Vandenberg, J.: Galaxy zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astron. Educ. Rev. 9(1), 010103 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Starbird, K., Muzny, G., Palen, L.: Learning from the crowd: collaborative filtering techniques for identifying on-the-ground Twitterers during mass disruptions. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, ISCRAM (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bojin, N., Shaw, C.D., Toner, M.: Designing and deploying a ‘compact’ crowdsourcing infrastructure: a case study. Bus. Inform. Rev. 28(1), 41–48 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    City of Melbourne, Budget Simulator Report, 10 Year Financial Plan Community Engagement (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Antorini, Y.M., Muñiz, A.M.: Invited article: the benefits and challenges of collaborating with user communities. Res. Technol. Manage. 56(3), 21–28 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lakhani, K.R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Tushman, M.: Open innovation and organizational boundaries: task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. In: Grandori, A. (ed.) Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organizational Theory, pp. 355–382. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Chen, J., Xu, H., Whinston, A.B.: Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 28(2), 237–268 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nandi, G., Das, A.: A survey on using data mining techniques for online social network analysis. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues (IJCSI) 10(6), 162–167 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feldstein, A.P.: Analyzing online communities: a narrative approach. MiT6: Stone and Papyrus, Storage and Transmission. International Conference (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Acosta, M., Zaveri, A., Simperl, E., Kontokostas, D., Auer, S., Lehmann, J.: Crowdsourcing linked data quality assessment. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 260–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 14(1), 75–90 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., Jayatilaka, B.: Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. ACM SIGMIS Database 35(4), 6–102 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decision. Harper, New York (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barnard, C.: The functions of the executive. Cambridge/Mass (1938)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Choo, C.W.: Sensemaking, knowledge creation, and decision making: organizational knowing as emergent strategy. In: Choo, C.W., Bontis, N. (eds.) The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, pp. 79–88. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3), 419–440 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B.: Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 9–30 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brogi, S., Calabrese, A., Campisi, D., Capece, G., Costa, R., Di Pillo, F.: Effects of online brand communities on brand equity in luxury fashion industry. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manage. 5(1), 1–9 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee, D., Kim, H.S., Kim, J.K.: The impact of online brand community type on consumer’s community engagement behaviors: consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web sites. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Network. 14(1–2), 59–63 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhu, K., Kraemer, K.L., Xu, S.: The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Manage. Sci. 52(10), 1557–1576 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lam, A.: Organizational innovation (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee, J.R., O’Neal, D.E., Pruett, M.W., Thomas, H.: Planning for dominance: a strategic perspective on the emergence of a dominant design. R&D Manage. 25(1), 3–15 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ansari, S., Munir, K.: Letting users into our world: some organizational implications of user-generated content. Res. Sociol. Organ. 29, 79–105 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Anderson, C.: Ephemeral architectures: towards a process architecture (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Rowe
    • 1
  • Marta Poblet
    • 1
  • John Douglas Thomson
    • 1
  1. 1.RMIT University Graduate School of Business and LawMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations