Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Dryland Forests pp 53–69Cite as

Private Versus Communal Tenure Systems in Gum Arabic Collection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 414 Accesses

Abstract

Communal management systems for acacia stands are still prominent in semi-arid gum producing areas. Competition over plots leads to lower quantities per household and, compared with private access systems, the gum collected is of lower quality. These communal systems also decrease the collectors’ incentives for tree management, may lead to overexploitation and even be sources of conflict over resources. Private systems are emerging either at individual level or through companies; in a gradual transition, mixed systems are found in which privately owned properties and communal forests coexist in villages where gum is collected in the Sylvopastoral Zone and Eastern Region of Senegal. This study investigates factors that influence the currently observed transition from communal to private collection systems at village level, briefly focusing on gender relations. With data from 53 villages in Senegal, a probit model is used to analyse the choice of organizing collection in communal systems. Mixed systems are preferred if markets are developing, labour for collection is available, competition for the resource is high, forests where gum is collected are located near the village or market prices are high enough to attract occasional collectors who reinforce the effect of competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A distinction was not made between land rights and tree rights because it is not evident that they are substitutes (see for example Bruce and Fortmann 1999, for cases when tree rights substitute for land rights).

References

  • Adriansen, H. K. (1999). Pastoral mobility as a response to climate variability in African drylands. Danish Journal of Geography, 99, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adriansen, H. K. (2006). Continuity and change in pastoral livelihoods of Senegalese Fulani. Agriculture and Human Values, 23, 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvard, M. S., & Kuznar, L. (2001). Deferred harvests: The transition from hunting to animal husbandry. American Anthropologist, 103(2), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. J. (2008). A structural model of the transition to agriculture. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(4), 257–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1998). Division of the commons: A partial assessment of the new institutional economics of land rights. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(3), 644–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, B., & Schreckenberg, K. (2007). Commercialization of non-timber forest products: A reality check. Development Policy Review, 25(3), 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, R. H. (1997). Perspective article: Economic models of pastoral land tenure. African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 14(1), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, J. W., & Fortmann, L. (1999). Contemporary uses of tree tenure. In L. E. Buck, J. P. Lassoie, & E. C. M. Fernandes (Eds.), Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. S., & Weitzman, M. L. (1974). A Marxian type model of enclosure. Journal of Development Economics, 1(4), 287–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafinger, A., & Pelican, M. (2006). Sharing or dividing the land?: Land rights and herder-farmer relations in a comparative view. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 40(1), 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 67(2), 347–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dione, M., & Sall, P. N. (1988). Le gommier et la gomme arabique au Sénégal Bilan des actions de recherche et de développement. Perspectives d’avenir. Troisième symposium sur le gommier et la gomme arabique. Saint Louis: DRPF.

    Google Scholar 

  • DPS and World Bank. (2004). La pauvrete au Sénégal: de la dévaluation de 1994 à 2001–2002. Dakar: Direction de la prévision et de la statistique.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2004). Tropical livestock units (TLU). Virtual Livestock Centre, Livestock and Environment Toolbox. http://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/Mixed1/TLU.htm

  • Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1990). The tragedy of the commons: Twenty-two years later. Human Ecology, 18(1), 1–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, L. (1985). The tree tenure factor in agroforestry with particular reference to Africa. Agroforestry Systems, 2(4), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberger, M. S. (1993a). Regenerating the gum arabic economy: Local level resource management in northern Senegal. In J. Friedman & H. Rangen (Eds.), In defense of livelihood: Comparative studies on environmental action (pp. 52–78). West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberger, M. S. (1993b). Land tenure, local institutions and natural resources in Senegal (Synthesis, Vol. I). Resource management and planning study. Dakar: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLCN. (2009). Global land cover network: Senegal land cover database. http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home?uuid=545be438-bc87-480b-83ec-ba3f4e486daf

  • Grell, H., & Kirk, M. (2000). The role of the donors in influencing property rights over pastoral resources in Sub-Saharan Africa. In N. McCarthy, B. Swallow, M. Kirk, & P. Hazell (Eds.), Property rights, risk, and livestock development in Africa (pp. 55–85). Washington: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, D. B. (1974). The agricultural systems of the world: An evolutionary approach. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, M., & Klasen, S. (2009). Endogenous institutional change and economic development: A micro-level analysis of transmission channels. Discussion paper 14. Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth. http://www2.vwl.wiso.uni-goettingen.de/courant-papers/CRC-PEG_DP_14.pdf

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science New Series, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Homma, A. K. O. (1996). Modernisation and technological dualism in the extractive economy in Amazonia. In M. Ruiz Perez & J. E. M. Arnold (Eds.), Current issues in non-timber forest products research (pp. 59–83). Bogor: CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRA/BAME. (1999). Ressources sauvages du Sénégal: un diagnostic participatif en zone sylvo-pastorale. Dakar: Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles/Bureau d’analyses macro-économiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (2001). Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. Advances in Macroeconomics, 1(2), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, R., Foley, R., Williams, E., Chang, C., Ingold, T., Olszewski, D. I., Rosenberg, M., Shackley, M. S., Smith, E. A., & Zvelebil, M. (1991). The transition between hunting and gathering and the specialized husbandry of resources: A socio-ecological approach [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 32(3), 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macharia, P. N., & Ekaya, W. N. (2005). The impact of rangeland condition and trend to the grazing resources of a semi-arid environment in Kenya. Journal of Human Ecology, 17(2), 143–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet, B., Besse, F., Gautier, D., Muller, D., Bouba, N., & Njiti, C. (2002). Quelles perspectives pour les gommiers en zones de savanes d'Afrique centrale? In J. Y. Jamin, L. Seiny Boukar & C. Floret (Eds.), Actes du colloque-Savanes africaines: des espaces en mutation, des acteurs face à de nouveaux défis. 27–31 mai, Garoua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K., & Newton, A. C. (2006). Commercialization of non-timber forest products: Factors influencing success. Lessons learned from Mexico and Bolivia and policy implications for decision-makers. Cambridge: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchunas, D. G., & Lauenroth, W. K. (1993). Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecological Monographs, 63(4), 327–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujawamariya, G., Burger, K., & D’Haese, M. (2012a). Quality of gum arabic in Senegal: Linking the laboratory research to the field assessment. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 51(4), 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujawamariya, G., Burger, K., & D’Haese, M. (2012b). Gum collection and collectors’ choice of selling outlet in Senegal. In J. F. Kennedy, G. O. Phillips, & P. A. Williams (Eds), Gum arabic. RSC Publishing. http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/ebook/978-1-84973-193

  • Myers, G., & Marceau, N. (2006). On the early Holocene: Foraging to early agriculture. Economic Journal, 116(513), 751–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1977). The first economic revolution. Economic History Review, 30(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and reality in the rain forest: How conservation strategies are failing in West Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, B. C., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PEPAM 2006. Accès à l’eau potable et à l’assainissement. Programme d’eau potable et d’assainissement du millénaire. http://www.pepam.gouv.sn/acces.php?rubr=serv

  • Quisumbing, A., & Otsuka, K. (2001). Land, trees, and women evolution of land tenure institutions in western Ghana and Sumatra. Research report. Vol. 121. Washington: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. (1989). Institutional innovation and agricultural development. World Development, 17(9), 1375–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. (2002). Social science knowledge and institutional innovation. Paper Prepared for Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-economics, University of Minnesota. 28 Jun 2002, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, W. H., Reynolds, J. F., Cunningham, G. L., Huenneke, L. F., Jarrell, W. M., Virginia, R. A., & Whitford, W. G. (1990). Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science, 247(4946), 1043–1048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UMR HydroSciences. (2005). Grilles de pluies mensuelles IRD-HSM. Système d’informations environnementales sur les ressources en eau et leur modélisation (SIEREM). http://www.hydrosciences.fr/sierem/produits/Grilles/GrillesIRD.asp

  • Wade, R. (1988). Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Oakland: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wane, A., Ancey, V., & Grosdidier, B. (2006). Les unités pastorales du Sahel sénégalais, outils de gestion de l’élevage et des espaces pastoraux. Projet durable ou projet de développement durable? Développement durable et territoires, Dossier 8: Méthodologies et pratiques territoriales de l’évaluation en matière de développement durable. http://developpementdurable.revues.org/3292

  • Webb, J. L. A. (1985). The trade in gum arabic: Prelude to French conquest in Senegal. Journal of African History, 26(2/3), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. L. A. (1995). Desert frontier. Ecological and economic change along the Western Sahel 1600–1850. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WFP (World Food Programme), United Nations-Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Centre de Suivi Ecologique (CSE), Commissariat National à la Sécurité Alimentaire (SE/CNSA) and Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET). (2011). Comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis (CFSVA)– Livelihood Zone Descriptions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum, K. F. (1997). Indigenous exploitation and management of tropical forest resources: An evolutionary continuum in forest-people interactions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 63, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., Wilkes, A., Yang, Y., Xu, J., Geslani, C. S., Yang, X., Gao, F., Yang, J., & Robinson, B. (2009). Common and privatized: Conditions for wise management of matsutake mushrooms in Northwest Yunnan province, China. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (1994). Institutional interplay: The environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 263–292). Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice), 33581, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Gaudiose Mujawamariya

  2. Development Economics Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706KN, The Netherlands

    Kees Burger

Authors
  1. Gaudiose Mujawamariya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kees Burger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaudiose Mujawamariya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cali, Colombia

    Purabi Bose

  2. Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands

    Han van Dijk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mujawamariya, G., Burger, K. (2016). Private Versus Communal Tenure Systems in Gum Arabic Collection. In: Bose, P., van Dijk, H. (eds) Dryland Forests. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19405-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation