Advertisement

Towards Flexible and Efficient Process and Workflow Support in Enterprise Modeling

  • Andreas DemuthEmail author
  • Markus Riedl-Ehrenleitner
  • Roland Kretschmer
  • Peter Hehenberger
  • Klaus Zeman
  • Alexander Egyed
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 215)

Abstract

In enterprise modeling, organizational structures as well as an enterprise’s processes and important artifacts (e.g., business knowledge stored in documents) are captured formally using different kinds of models. These models are not only used for documentation purposes, but they are also used to provide guidance for employees. For example, the models may impose rules on artifact access (i.e., who is allowed to view or manipulate certain artifacts) or they may define workflows for individual processes (e.g., which employees should perform which adaptation steps, and in which order). However, existing enterprise modeling approaches typically support only coarse-grained artifacts. For instance, only individual files can be associated with workflow tasks. Unfortunately, enterprise artifacts are typically of high complexity (e.g., spreadsheets contain millions of data cells). Therefore, it is not sufficient to provide employees only with information about the artifacts involved in a task, but it is necessary to provide more detailed information (e.g., which cells in a spreadsheet are relevant).

In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to enterprise modeling that addresses the issue of too coarse-grained support for enterprise artifacts. Our approach relies on a generic knowledge-sharing platform, called DesignSpace, in which all aspects of an enterprise are integrated and stored at a fine level of granularity. The DesignSpace supports fine-grained representation of enterprise artifacts and their linking to tasks in defined workflows. Moreover, it enables automatic, efficient, and generic workflow support. First case studies suggest that the approach is feasible and provides significant improvements in terms of efficiency compared to state-of-the-practice enterprise modeling solutions.

Keywords

Enterprise modeling Workflow support Consistency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): P25289-N15 and P25513-N15, FWF Lise-Meitner Fellowship M1421-N15, and the Austrian Center of Competence in Mechatronics (ACCM).

References

  1. 1.
    Florez, H., Sánchez, M.E., Villalobos, J.: iarchimate: A tool for managing imperfection in enterprise models. In: EDOC Workshops, pp. 201–210 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinto, V.A., de Rezende Rohlfs, C.L., Parreiras, F.S.: Applications of ontologies in enterprise modelling: A systematic mapping study. In: ER Workshops, pp. 23–32 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berio, G., Vernadat, F.B.: New developments in enterprise modelling using cimosa. Comput. Ind. 40(2), 99–114 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gudas, S., Lopata, A., Skersys, T.: Approach to enterprise modelling for information systems engineering. Informatica 16(2), 175–192 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vernadat, F.: Ueml: towards a unified enterprise modelling language. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40(17), 4309–4321 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petrikina, J., Drews, P., Schirmer, I., Zimmermann, K.: Integrating business models and enterprise architecture. In: EDOC Workshops, pp. 47–56 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sunkle, S., Rathod, H.: Visual modeling editor and ontology api-based analysis for decision making in enterprises - experience and way ahead. In: EDOC Workshops, pp. 182–190 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank, U.: Enterprise modelling: The next steps. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. 9(1), 22–37 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vernadat, F.B.: Enterprise modeling and integration (emi): Current status and research perspectives. Annu. Rev. Control 26(1), 15–25 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barone, D., Yu, E., Won, J., Jiang, L., Mylopoulos, J.: Enterprise modeling for business intelligence. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Demuth, A., Riedl-Ehrenleitner, M., Nöhrer, A., Hehenberger, P., Zeman, K., Egyed, A.: DesignSpace - an Infrastructure for multi-user/multi-tool engineering. In: SAC (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antunes, C., Caetano, A., Borbinha, J.L.: Enterprise architecture model analysis using description logics. In: EDOC Workshops, pp. 237–244 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Demuth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Markus Riedl-Ehrenleitner
    • 1
  • Roland Kretschmer
    • 1
  • Peter Hehenberger
    • 1
  • Klaus Zeman
    • 1
  • Alexander Egyed
    • 1
  1. 1.Johannes Kepler University (JKU)LinzAustria

Personalised recommendations