Advertisement

Completing Workflow Traces Using Action Languages

  • Chiara Di Francescomarino
  • Chiara Ghidini
  • Sergio Tessaris
  • Itzel Vázquez Sandoval
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9097)

Abstract

The capability to monitor process and service executions, which has gone to notably increase in the last decades due to the growing adoption of IT-systems, has brought to the diffusion of several reasoning-based tools for the analysis of process executions. Nevertheless, in many real cases, the different degrees of abstraction of models and IT-data, the lack of IT-support on all the steps of the model, as well as information hiding, result in process execution data conveying only incomplete information concerning the process-level activities. This may hamper the capability to analyse and reason about process executions. This paper presents a novel approach to recover missing information about process executions, relying on a reformulation in terms of a planning problem.

Keywords

Business processes Planning Execution logs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rogge-Solti, A., Mans, R.S., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M.: Improving documentation by repairing event logs. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M., Zdravkovic, J., Stirna, J. (eds.) PoEM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 165, pp. 129–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertoli, P., Di Francescomarino, C., Dragoni, M., Ghidini, C.: Reasoning-based techniques for dealing with incomplete business process execution traces. In: Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Boella, G., Micalizio, R. (eds.) AI*IA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8249, pp. 469–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nau, D., Ghallab, M., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory & Practice. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2004) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eiter, T., Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Polleres, A.: A logic programming approach to knowledge-state planning, ii: The dlvk system. Artificial Intelligence 144, 157–211 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lifschitz, V.: Action languages, answer sets and planning. In: The Logic Programming Paradigm: A 25-Year Perspective, pp. 357–373. Springer Verlag (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Yawl: Yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30, 245–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiepuszewski, B., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Bussler, C.J.: On structured workflow modelling. In: Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, pp. 241–255. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vázquez Sandoval, I.: Automated Reasoning Support for Process Models using Action Language. Master’s thesis, Computer Science Faculty, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Russell, N.C.: Foundations of process-aware information systems. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow data patterns: identification, representation and tool support. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 353–368. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eiter, T., Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Polleres, A.: A logic programming approach to knowledge-state planning: Semantics and complexity. INFSYS Research Report INFSYS RR-1843-01-11. TU Wien (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Aalst, W., et al.: Process mining manifesto. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 169–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking using cost-based fitness analysis. In: Proc. of EDOC 2011, pp. 55–64 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F.: Data- and resource-aware conformance checking of business processes. In: Abramowicz, W., Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V. (eds.) BIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 117, pp. 48–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Leoni, M., Maggi, F.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Aligning event logs and declarative process models for conformance checking. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 82–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohn, D., Hull, R.: Business artifacts: A data-centric approach to modeling business operations and processes. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering 32, 3–9 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hull, R., Damaggio, E., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., Heath III, F.T., Hobson, S., Linehan, M., Maradugu, S., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P., et al.: Introducing the guard-stage-milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles (invited talk). In: Bravetti, M. (ed.) WS-FM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6551, pp. 1–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Regis, G., Ricci, N., Aguirre, N.M., Maibaum, T.: Specifying and verifying declarative fluent temporal logic properties of workflows. In: Gheyi, R., Naumann, D. (eds.) SBMF 2012. LNCS, vol. 7498, pp. 147–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodríguez-Moreno, M.D., Borrajo, D., Cesta, A., Oddi, A.: Integrating planning and scheduling in workflow domains. Expert Systems with Applications 33, 389–406 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    da Silva, C.E., de Lemos, R.: A framework for automatic generation of processes for self-adaptive software systems. Informatica (Slovenia) 35, 3–13 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marrella, A., Russo, A., Mecella, M.: Planlets: automatically recovering dynamic processes in yawl. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7565, pp. 268–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marrella, A., Mecella, M., Russo, A.: Featuring automatic adaptivity through workflow enactment and planning. In: CollaborateCom 2011 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FBK-IRSTTrentoItaly
  2. 2.Free University of Bozen–BolzanoBozen-BolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations