Advertisement

Abstract

A common conversation between an older adult and a nurse about health-related issues includes topics such as troubles with sleep, reasons for walking around nighttime, pain conditions, etc. This dialogue emerges from the participating human’s lines of thinking, their roles, needs and motives, while switching between topics as the dialogue unfolds. This paper presents a dialogue system that enables a human to engage in a dialogue with a software agent to reason about health-related issues in a home environment. The purpose of this work is to conduct a pilot evaluation study of a prototype system for human-agent dialogues, which is built upon a set of semantic models and integrated in a web application designed for older adults. Focus of the study was to receive qualitative results regarding purpose and content of the agent-based dialogue system, and to evaluate a method for the agent to evaluate its behavior based on the human agent’s perception of appropriateness of moves. The participants include five therapists and 11 older adults. The results show users’ feedback on the purpose of dialogues and the appropriateness of dialogues presented to them during the interaction with the software agent.

Keywords

Human-agent interaction Human-agent dialogue Health Active assistive technology Evaluation User experience 

References

  1. 1.
    Kennedy, C.M., Powell, J., Payne, T.H., Ainsworth, J., Boyd, A., Buchan, I.: Active assistance technology for health-related behavior change: An interdisciplinary review. J. Med. Internet Res. 14(3), e80 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lindgren, H., Surie, D., Nilsson, I.: Agent-supported assessment for adaptive and personalized ambient assisted living. In: Corchado, J.M., Pérez, J.B., Hallenborg, K., Golinska, P., Corchuelo, R. (eds.) Trends in PAAMS. AISC, vol. 90, pp. 25–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindgren, H., Winnberg, P.J., Winnberg, P.: Domain experts tailoring interaction to users – an evaluation study. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6948, pp. 644–661. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindgren, H., Nilsson, I.: Towards user-authored agent dialogues for assessment in personalised ambient assisted living. Int. J. Web Eng. Technol. 8(2), 154–176 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lindgren, H.: Towards context-based inquiry dialogues for personalized interaction. In: Demazeau, Y., Pechoucek, M., Corchado, J.M., Pérez, J.B. (eds.) Adv. on Prac. Appl. Agents and Mult. Syst. AISC, vol. 88, pp. 151–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fox, J., et al.: Towards a canonical framework for designing agents to support healthcare organisations. In: Proceedings of the European Conference of AI (ECAI) Workshop Agents Applied in Healthcare (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baskar, J., Lindgren, H.: Towards personalised support for monitoring and improving health in risky environments. In: VIII Workshop on Agents Applied in Health Care (A2HC 2013), Murcia, Spain, pp. 93–104 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baskar, J.: Adaptive human-agent dialogues for reasoning about health, Licentiate Thesis, Umea University (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baskar, J., Lindgren, H.: Cognitive architecture of an agent for human-agent dialogues. In: Corchado, J.M., et al. (eds.) PAAMS 2014. CCIS, vol. 430, pp. 89–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bickmore, T., Mitchell, S., Jack, B., Paasche-Orlow, M.: Response to a relational agent by hospital patients with depressive symptoms. Interact. Comput. 22, 289–298 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bickmore, T.W., Schulman, D., Sidner, C.L.: A reusable framework for health counseling dialogue systems based on a behavioral medicine ontology. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 183–197 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan, C., Lindgren, H.: Hypothesis-driven agent dialogues for dementia assessment. In: VIII Workshop on Agents Applied in Health Care (A2HC 2013), Murcia, Spain, pp. 93–104 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pollack, M., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C.E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Tsamardinos, I.: An intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robot. Auton. Syst. 44, 273–282 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bickmore, T., Cassell, J.: Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In: Advances in Natural, Multimodal Dialogue Systems, pp. 4–8 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bickmore, T., Caruso, L., Clough-Gorr, K., Heeren, T.: ‘It’s just like you talk to a friend’ relational agents for older adults. Interact. Comput. 17, 711–735 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susan, R., Traum, D.R., Ittycheriah, M., Henderer, J.: What would you ask a conversational agent? observations of human-agent dialogues in a museum setting. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 69–102 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alistair, K., Vlugter, P.: Multi-agent human-machine dialogue: issues in dialogue management and referring expression semantics. In: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 172(2–3), pp. 69–102. Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., Essex (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Isern, D., Sánchez, D., Moreno, A.: Agents applied in health care: A review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 79, 145–166 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vedel, I., Akhlaghpour, S., Vaghefi, I., Bergman, H., Lapointe, L.: Health information technologies in geriatrics and gerontology: a mixed systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. (JAMIA) 20, 1109–1119 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations