Evolution of Synaptic Delay Based Neural Controllers for Implementing Central Pattern Generators in Hexapod Robotic Structures

  • José Santos
  • Pablo Fernández
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9108)


We used synaptic delay based neural networks for implementing Central Pattern Generators (CPGs) for locomotion behaviors in hexapod robotic structures. These networks incorporate synaptic delays in their connections which allow greater time reasoning capabilities in the neural controllers, and additionally we incorporated the concept of the center-crossing condition in such networks to facilitate obtaining oscillation patterns for the robotic control. We compared the results against continuous time recurrent neural networks, one of the neural models most used as CPG, when proprioceptive information is used to provide fault tolerance for the required behavior.


Central Pattern Generator Oscillation Pattern Proprioceptive Information Neural Oscillator Neural Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beer, R.: On the dynamics of small continuous time recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behaviour 3(4), 469–509 (1995)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campo, A., Santos, J.: Evolution of adaptive center-crossing continuous time recurrent neural networks for biped robot control. In: Proceedings European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN 2010), pp. 535–540 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duro, R.J., Santos, J.: Discrete time backpropagation for training synaptic delay based artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 10(4), 779–789 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duro, R.J., Santos, J.: Modeling temporal series through synaptic delay based neural networks. Neural Computing and Applications 11, 224–237 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feoktistov, V.: Differential Evolution: In Search of Solutions. Springer, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ijspeert, A.J.: Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review. Neural Networks 21(4), 642–653 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Mathayomchan, B., Beer, R.: Center-crossing recurrent neural networks for the evolution of rhythmic behavior. Neural Computation 14, 2043–2051 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Price, K.V., Storn, R.M., Lampinen, J.A.: Differential Evolution. A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Natural Comp. Series. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reil, T., Husbands, P.: Evolution of central pattern generators for bipedal walking in a real-time physics environment. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 159–168 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santos, J.: Evolved center-crossing recurrent synaptic delay based neural networks for biped locomotion control. In: Proceedings IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE-CEC 2013), pp. 142–148 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santos, J., Campo, A.: Biped locomotion control with evolved adaptive center-crossing continuous time recurrent neural networks. Neurocomputing 86, 86–96 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santos, J., Duro, R.J.: Influence of noise on discrete time backpropagation trained networks. Neurocomputing 41(1-4), 67–89 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, R.: Open Dynamics Engine (2003),

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of A CoruñaA CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations