IS Success Awareness in Community-Oriented Design Science Research

  • Dominik RenzelEmail author
  • Ralf Klamma
  • Matthias Jarke
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9073)


Design efforts on innovative IS artifacts are increasingly taking place in agile, small, and specialized long-tail communities supported by academic research. Long-tail communities need to reflect and develop awareness for the success of community-specific IS (CIS) artifacts in their particular practice context in an ongoing manner. In community-oriented DSR, researchers participate as active community members contributing CIS success awareness with the help of CIS success models resulting from ongoing CIS evaluation. However, CIS success awareness is challenging to achieve compared to organizational IS due to diversity, dynamicity, informal structures and permeable boundaries. In this paper, we emphasize the benefits of ongoing CIS success awareness with the help of custom-tailored CIS success models in community-oriented DSR contexts. We demonstrate our approach in a longitudinal case study of designing and evaluating therapeutic tools in an aphasia community.


Business Intelligence Information System Research Design Science Research Aphasia Patient Longitudinal Case Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, C.: The Long Tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., Powell, P.L.: The 3-D Model of Information Systems Success: the Search for the Dependent Variable Continues. Information Resources Management Journal 9(4), 5–14 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brynjolfsson, E.: The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology. Communications of the ACM 36(12), 66–77 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton-Jones, A., Straub, D.W.: Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test. Information Systems Research 17(3), 228–246 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., Narasayya, V.: An Overview of Business Intelligence Technology. Communications of the ACM 54(8), 88–98 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Damasio, A.R.: Aphasia. New England Journal of Medicine 326(8), 531–539 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R., Sedera, D.: Future of Information Systems Success: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Topi, H., Tucker, A. (eds.) Computing Handbook, 3rd edn. Information Systems and Information Technology, pp. 70: 1–19. CRC Press (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devaraj, S., Kohli, R.: Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? Management Science 49(3), 273–289 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J.A.: Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management 17(4), 263–282 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diamantopoulos, A., Winklhofer, H.M.: Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 269–277 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gable, G.G., Sedera, D., Chan, T.: Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: the IS-Impact Measurement Model. Journal of the Association of Information Systems 9(7), 377–408 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly 37(2), 337–355 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iriberri, A., Leroy, G.: A Life-Cycle Perspective on Online Community Success. ACM Computing Surveys 41(2), 1–29 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jarvis, C.B., Mackenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M.: A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecication in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 30, 199–218 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leimeister, J.M., Sidiras, P., Krcmar, H.: Success Factors of Virtual Communities from the Perspective of Members and Operators: An Empirical Study. In: HICSS 2004: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004) - Track 7, p. 70194–1. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mustaquim, M.M., Nyström, T.: Designing information systems for sustainability – the role of universal design and open innovation. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 37–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spaniol, M., Springer, L., Klamma, R., Jarke, M.: SOCRATES: Barrier Free Communities of Aphasics on the Internet. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Burger, D. (eds.) ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118, pp. 1024–1031. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Straub, D.W., Hoffman, D.L., Weber, B.W., Steinfield, C.: Measuring e-Commerce in Net-Enabled Organizations: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Information Systems Research 13(2), 115–124 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Learning in doing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Community Information Systems (ACIS) Group Chair of Computer Science 5RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations