Advertisement

RoboCup Rescue Simulation Innovation Strategy

  • Arnoud Visser
  • Nobuhiro Ito
  • Alexander Kleiner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8992)

Abstract

The RoboCup rescue simulation competitions have been held since 2001. The experience gained during these competitions has supported the development of multi-agent and robotics based solution for disaster mitigation. The league consists of three distinct competitions. These competitions are the agent competition, the virtual robots competition, and the infrastructure competition. The main goal of the infrastructure competition is to increase every year the challenge and to drive the innovation of the league, while the agent and virtual robot competition are focused on developing intelligent agents and robot control systems that can cope with those challenges. This paper provides an overview on the current state-of-the-art in the league and developments and innovations planned for the future.

Keywords

Task Allocation Traffic Simulation Fire Brigade Rescue Robot Incident Commander 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Murphy, R.: Disaster Robotics. Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents series. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagatani, K., Kiribayashi, S., Okada, Y., Otake, K., Yoshida, K., Tadokoro, S., Nishimura, T., Yoshida, T., Koyanagi, E., Fukushima, M., et al.: Emergency response to the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plants using mobile rescue robots. J. Field Robot. 30, 44–63 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Skinner, C., Barley, M.: RoboCup rescue simulation competition: status report. In: Bredenfeld, A., Jacoff, A., Noda, I., Takahashi, Y. (eds.) RoboCup 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4020, pp. 632–639. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjou, A., Shimada, S.: RoboCup rescue: search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In: IEEE Conference on Man, Systems, and Cybernetics (SMC 1999) (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tadokoro, S., Kitano, H., Takahashi, T., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Shinjou, A., Koto, T., Takeuchi, I., Takahashi, H., Matsuno, F., Hatayama, M., Nobe, J., Shimada, S.: The RoboCup-rescue project: a robotic approach to the disaster mitigation problem. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scerri, P., Farinelli, A., Okamoto, S., Tambe, M.: Allocating tasks in extreme teams. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 727–734. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chapman, A., Micillo, R.A., Kota, R., Jennings, N.: Decentralised dynamic task allocation using overlapping potential games. Comput. J. 53, 1462–1477 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferreira, P., Dos Santos, F., Bazzan, A., Epstein, D., Waskow, S.: Robocup rescue as multiagent task allocation among teams: experiments with task interdependencies. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 20, 421–443 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dos Santos, F., Bazzan, A.L.: Towards efficient multiagent task allocation in the robocup rescue: a biologically-inspired approach. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 22, 465–486 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kleiner, A., Farinelli, A., Ramchurn, S., Shi, B., Maffioletti, F., Reffato, R.: RMASBench: benchmarking dynamic multi-agent coordination in urban search and rescue. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS2013), pp. 1195–1196 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nair, R., Ito, T., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: Task allocation in RoboCup rescue simulation domain. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on RoboCup (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramchurn, S., Farinelli, A., Macarthur, K., Jennings, N.: Decentralized coordination in RoboCup rescue. Comput. J. 53, 1447–1461 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleiner, A., Brenner, M., Bräuer, T., Dornhege, C., Göbelbecker, M., Luber, M., Prediger, J., Stückler, J., Nebel, B.: Successful search and rescue in simulated disaster areas. In: Bredenfeld, A., Jacoff, A., Noda, I., Takahashi, Y. (eds.) RoboCup 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4020, pp. 323–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schurr, N., Tambe, M.: Using multi-agent teams to improve the training of incident commanders. In: Defence Industry Applications of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp. 151–166 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nüssle, T.A., Kleiner, A., Brenner, M.: Approaching urban disaster reality: the ResQ firesimulator. In: Nardi, D., Riedmiller, M., Sammut, C., Santos-Victor, J. (eds.) RoboCup 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3276, pp. 474–482. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shahbazi, H., Abdolmaleki, A., Salehi, S., Shahsavari, M., Movahedi, M.: Robocup rescue 2010 – rescue simulation league team description paper - brave circles - infra-structure competition. In: Proceedings CD of the 14th RoboCup International Symposium (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dijkshoorn, N., Visser, A.: An elevation map from a micro aerial vehicle for urban search and rescue. In: Proceedings CD of the 16th RoboCup International Symposium (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gohardani, P.D., Ardestani, P., Mehrabi, S., Yousefi, M.A.: Flying Agent: An Improvement to Urban Disaster Mitigation in Robocup Rescue Simulation System. Mechatronics Research Laboratory, Qazvin, Iran (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olson, E., Strom, J., Morton, R., Richardson, A., Ranganathan, P., Goeddel, R., Bulic, M., Crossman, J., Marinier, B.: Progress towards multi-robot reconnaissance and the MAGIC 2010 competition. J. Field Robot. 29(2012), 762–792 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oliehoek, F.A., Visser, A.: A decision-theoretic approach to collaboration: principal description methods and efficient heuristic approximations. In: Babuška, R., Groen, F.C.A. (eds.) Interactive Collaborative Information Systems. SCI, vol. 281, pp. 87–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fitzpatrick, S., Meetrens, L.: Distributed coordination through anarchic optimization. In: Distributed Sensor Networks A Multiagent Perspective, pp. 257–293. Kluwer Academic (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farinelli, A., Rogers, A., Petcu, A., Jennings, N.R.: Decentralised coordination of low-power embedded devices using the max-sum algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2008), pp. 639–646 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Okaya, M., Takahashi, T.: Proposal for everywhere evacuation simulation system. In: Röfer, T., Mayer, N.M., Savage, J., Saranlı, U. (eds.) RoboCup 2011. LNCS, vol. 7416, pp. 246–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ackerman, E.: Darpa robotics challenge trials: what you should (and shouldn’t) expect to see. IEEE Spectrum, vol. 19 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luo, J., Zhang, Y., Hauser, K., Park, H.A., Paldhe, M., Lee, C.S.G., Grey, M., Stilman, M., Oh, J.H., Lee, J., Kim, I., Oh, P.: Robust ladder-climbing with a humanoid robot with application to the darpa robotics challenge. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Formsma, O., Dijkshoorn, N., van Noort, S., Visser, A.: Realistic simulation of laser range finder behavior in a smoky environment. In: Ruiz-del-Solar, J. (ed.) RoboCup 2010. LNCS, vol. 6556, pp. 336–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnoud Visser
    • 1
  • Nobuhiro Ito
    • 2
  • Alexander Kleiner
    • 3
  1. 1.Universiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Aichi Institute of TechnologyToyota CityJapan
  3. 3.Linköpings UniversitetLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations