FRAMES A Framework for Adaptable Mobile Event-Contingent Self-report Studies

  • Julian Dax
  • Thomas Ludwig
  • Johanna Meurer
  • Volkmar Pipek
  • Martin Stein
  • Gunnar Stevens
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9083)

Abstract

With the emergence of smart, sensor-equipped mobile devices, the gathering and processing of data concerning the everyday lifestyles of the people using these devices has become a matter of course within the field of HCI. New standards in mobile technologies provide new opportunities for empirical studies, which allow researchers to explore people’s everyday lives unobtrusively. Furthermore, mobile, sensor-based approaches enhance empirical studies by automatically recognizing events of interest such as the arrival at specific locations. In this paper we describe how end-user development can be used to empower researchers without technical expertise to adjust their empirical studies to the individual dynamics of daily life. To do so, we implemented and evaluated the framework ‘FRAMES’ that allows researchers to flexibly specify and adopt mobile event-contingent self-report studies. The evaluation shows the potential of our framework for spontaneous customizations of the study without the need for redeployment or modification of the application.

Keywords

Self-report End-user development Mobile devices Complex event processing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fortunati, L.: The mobile phone: local and global dimensions. In: Nyíria, K. (ed.) A Sense of Place. The Global and the Local in Mobile Communication, pp. 61–70. Wien (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Böhmer, M., Hecht, B., Johannes, S., Krüger, A., Bauer, G.: Falling asleep with angry birds, facebook and kindle – a large scale study on mobile application usage. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 47–56. ACM, Stockholm, Sweden (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Do, T., Gatica-Perez, D.: By their apps you shall understand them: mining large-scale patterns of mobile phone usage. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, p. 27. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gouveia, R., Karapanos, E.: Footprint tracker: supporting diary studies with lifelogging. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2921–2930. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, P., Mikkelsen, M.R., Nielsen, T.A.S., Harder, H.: Children, Mobility, and Space: Using GPS and Mobile Phone Technologies in Ethnographic Research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 5, 227–246 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bolger, N., Davis, A., Rafaeli, E.: Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 579–616 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Redelmeier, D.A., Kahneman, D.: Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66, 3–8 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wheeler, L., Reis, H.T.: Self-Recording of Everyday Life Events: Origins, Types, and Uses. J. Pers. 59, 339–354 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, B.A.T., Sellen, A.J., O’Hara, K.P.: A diary study of information capture in working life. In: Turner, T., Szwillus, G., Czerwinski, M., Paternò, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 438–445. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hulkko, S., Mattelmäki, T., Virtanen, K., Keinonen, T.: Mobile probes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction, pp. 43–51. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Consolvo, S., Walker, M.: Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2, 24–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306, 1776–1780 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dörner, C., Heß, J., Pipek, V.: Fostering user-developer collaboration with infrastructure probes. Inf. Syst. J., 45–48 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Church, K., Smyth, B.: Understanding mobile information needs. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 493–494. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brandt, J., Weiss, N., Klemmer, S.R.: txt 4 l8r : Lowering the burden for diary studies under mobile conditions. In: ACM (ed.) Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2007, pp. 2303–2308. ACM New York (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Möller, A., Kranz, M., Schmid, B., Roalter, L., Diewald, S.: Investigating self-reporting behavior in long-term studies. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2013, p. 2931. ACM, New York, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robinson, M.D., Clore, G.L.: Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychol. Bull. 128, 934–960 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Froehlich, J., Chen, M.Y., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Landay, J.A.: MyExperience: a system for in situ tracing and capturing of user feedback on mobile phones. In: Design, pp. 57–70. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, N., Liu, Y., Wang, X.: Data logging plus e-diary: towards an online evaluation approach of mobile service field trial. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 287–290. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lieberman, H., Paternò, F., Wulf, V.: End User Development. Springer, Netherlands (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henderson, A., Kyng, M.: There’s no place like home: continuing design in use. In: Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M., (eds.) Design at Work Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, pp. 219–240. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1991)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malone, T.W., Lai, K.-Y., Fry, C.: Experiments with Oval: a radically tailorable tool for cooperative work (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fischer, G., Girgensohn, A., Nakakoji, K., Redmiles, D.: Supporting software designers with integrated domain-oriented design environments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18, 511–522 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dourish, P.: Developing a reflective model of collaborative systems (1995)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stiemerling, O., Wulf, V.: Beyond “Yes or No” - Extending Access Control in Groupware with Awareness and Negotiation. Gr. Decis. Negot. 9, 221 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kruse, H.C.J., Slagter, R.J., Ter Hofte, G.H.: Collaborative component software: The CoCoWare framework and its application (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luckham, D.C.: The power of events: an introduction to complex event processing in distributed enterprise systems. In: Bassiliades, N., Governatori, G., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2008. LNCS, vol. 5321, p. 3. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Indulska, J., Bettini, C., Campbell, R., Mascolo, C., Aharony, N., Pan, W., Ip, C., Khayal, I., Pentland, A.: Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 7, 643–659 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Twidale, M., Randall, D., Bentley, R.: Situated evaluation for cooperative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 441–452. ACM (1994)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ludwig, T., Scholl, S., Pipek, V.: PartS: Participatory Sensing for In Situ Capturing of People’s Behavior from an End-User Perspective (2015) (in review)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Dax
    • 1
  • Thomas Ludwig
    • 1
  • Johanna Meurer
    • 1
  • Volkmar Pipek
    • 1
  • Martin Stein
    • 1
  • Gunnar Stevens
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information SystemsUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations