Defining and Assessing Economic Policy Instruments for Sustainable Water Management

  • Manuel Lago
  • Jaroslav Mysiak
  • Carlos M. Gómez
  • Gonzalo Delacámara
  • Alexandros Maziotis
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 14)

Abstract

This first chapter sets the scene for the work presented in this book. Based on a review of the literature, the chapter introduces a definition of economic policy instruments (EPIs) and a classification of broad categories of EPIs relevant for water policy that will be used to present the following parts of the book (prices, trading and other instruments) and following chapters/case studies under each part. A literature review is presented to justify the relevance on the selection of the three broad categories of instruments selected. Further, this chapter introduces the state of the art in the application of water EPIs and their ex-post evaluation, which is followed by the presentation of the criteria that is used for the evaluation of economic policy instruments that has been applied to all the case studies in the book. In this context, criteria are grouped into three outcome criteria and three process criteria. Outcome-oriented criteria describe how the EPIs perform. They include intended and unintended economic and environmental outcomes and the distribution of benefits and costs among the affected parties. These steps consider the application of cost effectiveness and cost benefits analysis for example to assess ex-post performance of the EPI. Process criteria describe the institutional conditions (legislative, political, cultural, etc.) affecting the formation and operation of the studied EPI (particularly relevant if we are assessing the possible impacts from the use of economic instruments), the transaction costs from implementing and enforcing the instruments and the process of implementation.

Keywords

Economic policy instruments Water policy Definition and categories Ex-post assessment Outcome-oriented and process-oriented evaluation criteria 

References

  1. Barthélémy, N., Verdier, L., & CGDD. (2008). Les marchés de quotas dans la gestion de l’eau: les exemples de l’Australie et de la Californie, Evaluation Letter, November 2008.Google Scholar
  2. Calatrava, J., & Garrido, A. (2005). Modelling water markets under uncertain water supply. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cantin, B., Shrubsole, D., & Ait-Ouyahia, M. (2005). Using economic instruments for water demand management: Introduction. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 30(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delacámara, G., Dworak, T., Gómez, C. M., Lago, M., Maziotis, A., Rouillard, J., & Strosser, P. (2013). EPI-water deliverable 5.3: Guidance on the design and development of economic policy instruments in European water policy. EPI-water – evaluating economic policy instruments for sustainable water management in Europe.Google Scholar
  5. European Environmental Agency (EEA). (2013). Assessment of cost recovery through water pricing. Technical report, No 16. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  6. Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Martínez, Y. (2006). Multi-criteria modelling of irrigation water market at basin level: A Spanish case study. European Journal of Operation Research, 173(1), 313–336.Google Scholar
  7. Kraemer, R. A., Castro, Z. G., da Motta, R. S., & Russell, C. (2003). Economic instruments for water management: Experiences from Europe and implications for Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Regional Policy Dialogue Study Series: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  8. Mattheiß, V., Le Mat, O., & Strosser, P. (2009). Which role for economic instruments in the management of water resources in Europe? In search for innovative ideas for application in the Netherlands. Report for the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.Google Scholar
  9. National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE). (2001). The United States experience with economic incentives for protecting the environment. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-240-R-01-001.Google Scholar
  10. OECD. (2001). Environmentally related taxes in OECD countries 15. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  11. OECD. (2010). Pricing water resources and water and sanitation services. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD. (2011). Economic instruments for water management. Environment Directorate, Environment Policy Committee. Paris, 27–28 Oct 2011. ENV/EPOC/WPBWE(2011)13.Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2012). A framework for financing water resources management. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ONEMA. (2009). Economic instruments to support water policy in Europe – Paving the way for research and future development. Workshop Synthesis report, Paris, 9 & 10 December 2009. Published by ONEMA and ACTeon. Available online at http://www.onema.fr/IMG/EV/meetings/instruments-economiques-UK-BD.pdf
  15. Policy Research Initiative (PRI). (2005). Economic instruments for water demand management in an integrated water resources management framework. Synthesis report. Policy Research Initiative Project Sustainable Development. PH4-18/2005E-PDF. ISBN 0-662-39330-9. Government of Canada Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Stavins, R. N. (2001). Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. Resources for the future, discussion paper 01–58.Google Scholar
  17. Thaler, T., Boteler, B., Dworak, T., Holen, S., & Lago, M. (2014). Investigating the use of environmental benefits in the policy decision process: A qualitative study focusing on the EU water policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(10), 1515–1530.Google Scholar
  18. UNEP. (2004). Economic instruments in biodiversity-related multilateral environment agreements (UNEP/ETB/2003/10). ISBN: 92-807-2390-1.Google Scholar
  19. Zetland, D., Dworak, T., Lago, M., Maziotis, A., & Viavattene, C. (2013). EPI-WATER discussion paper 02: An orientation to the assessment framework for evaluating economic policy instruments for managing water. EPI-WATER – Evaluating economic policy instruments for sustainable water management in Europe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Lago
    • 1
  • Jaroslav Mysiak
    • 2
  • Carlos M. Gómez
    • 3
  • Gonzalo Delacámara
    • 4
  • Alexandros Maziotis
    • 5
  1. 1.Ecologic InstituteBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)VeniceItaly
  3. 3.Departamento de EconomíaUniversidad de Alcalá and IMDEA-Water FoundationAlcalá de Henares (Madrid)Spain
  4. 4.Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies in Water (IMDEA-Water Foundation)Alcalá de Henares (Madrid)Spain
  5. 5.School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering (MACE)University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations