Mathematical Modelling Tasks and the Mathematical Thinking of Students

  • Bárbara Palharini
  • Lourdes Maria Werle de Almeida
Part of the International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling book series (IPTL)

Abstract

This chapter describes a study that aims to illustrate how the interaction between mathematical modelling tasks and students’ mathematical thinking takes place. We based the study upon David Tall’s theory about mathematical thinking regarding mathematical modelling as a pedagogical way to teach mathematics. The research took place in the last year of a university course, with education students undertaking a mathematics degree. A qualitative approach was used with an interpretative analysis to infer points from data collected through audio recordings, video, quizzes, and written data. We have concluded that mathematical modelling can provide, and require the development of cognitive processes that promote interactions between “elementary” and “advanced” mathematical thinking through the cognitive processes of representation, abstraction and generalization.

Keywords

Mathematical Thinking Modelling Task Mathematical Task Cognitive Perspective Mathematical Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almeida, L. M. W., & Dias, M. R. (2004). A study on the use of mathematical modelling as a strategy for teaching and learning. BOLEMA – Boletim de Educação Matemática, 22, 19–35.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, L. M. W., & Ferruzzi, E. (2009). A socioepistemological approach to mathematical modelling. Alexandria Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia, 2(2), 117–134.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, D. (2003). Modelling in the perspective of thought. Annals of the III national conference on modelling and mathematics education, 1–11. Piracicaba, SP.Google Scholar
  4. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1994). Qualitative research in education. Porto: Porto Editora.Google Scholar
  5. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modeling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, T. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A “proceptual” view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 116–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modelling in mathematics education. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 302–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Palharini, B. N. (2010). Mathematical modelling and mathematical thinking: A study in the light of the three worlds of mathematics. Master's thesis, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina.Google Scholar
  10. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tall, D. (1995). Cognitive growth in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Carraher & L. Miera (Eds.), Proceedings of 19th international conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 61–75). Recife: PME.Google Scholar
  12. Tall, D. (2002). Advanced mathematical thinking. Cambridge: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Tall, D. (2004a). Introducing three worlds of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 29–33.Google Scholar
  14. Tall, D. (2004b). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 281–288). Bergen: PME.Google Scholar
  15. Tall, D. (2006). A theory of mathematical growth through embodiment, symbolism and proof. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 11, 195–215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bárbara Palharini
    • 1
  • Lourdes Maria Werle de Almeida
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNorthern Paraná State UniversityCornélio ProcópioBrazil
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of LondrinaLondrinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations