Abstract

This chapter reviews abuse and neglect among children and adults with disabilities, and highlights the importance of identifying abuse and neglect in these individuals because of their increased vulnerability, difficulties in communication, and potential for ongoing victimization. Patterns of presentation of victimization are discussed and suggestions are given to aid in their recognition among several challenged populations. Developmental considerations in the evaluation of abuse are reviewed, as well as interviewing children with developmental disabilities and supporting parents with developmental disabilities. Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and abuse are also discussed, including issues with parenting and intervening with adults who have a disability. We conclude with recommendations to improve practice among adults and children with disabilities.

Keywords

Intimate Partner Violence Sexual Abuse Child Abuse Intellectual Disability Child Protective Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank J. Manders, A. Grosvald-Hamilton, P. Toth, and J. Kenniston for additional information provided by personal communication. Additional information is available from: Teachers College, Columbia University [producer]. Child Abuse and Children with Disabilities: A New York State Perspective: 2004 [CD-ROM]. Available from New York State Office of Children and Family Services. Readers are directed to this article with the full list of citations and references: Palusci VJ, Datner E, Wilkins C. Developmental disabilities: Abuse and neglect in children and adults. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development 2015;8(4) 407–428.

References

  1. 1.
    Kempe CH, Silverman FN, Steele BF, Droegemueller W, Silver HK. The battered-child syndrome. JAMA. 1962;181:17–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. Report of the Consultation on Child Abuse Prevention. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press. Document WHO/HSC/PVI/99.1, March, 1999. URL: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_HSC_PVI_99.1.pdf
  3. 3.
    Straus MA, Gelles R, Steinmetz S. Behind closed doors: violence in the American family. Garden City: Anchor Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brownridge DA. Violence against women: vulnerable populations. Florence: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bur Justice Stat. Crime characteristics. 2005. URL: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/cvict_c.html
  6. 6.
    Dobash RP, Dobash RE, Cavanagh K, Lewis R. Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassouneh-Phillips D, Curry MA. Abuse of women with disabilities: state of the science. Rehab Couns Bull. 2002;45(2):96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Powers LE, Hughes RB, Lund EM. Interpersonal violence and women with disabilities: a research update. Harrisburg: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence; 2009. URL: http://vawnet.org
  9. 9.
    Martin SL, Ray N, Sotres-Alvarez D, Kupper LL, Moracco KE, Dickens PA, Scandlin D, Gizlice Z. Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women. 2006;12(9):823–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brownridge DA. Partner violence against women with disabilities: prevalence, risk and explanations. Violence Against Women. 2006;12(9):805–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curry MA, Hassouneh-Phillips D, Johnston-Silverberg A. Abuse of women with disabilities: an ecological model and review. Violence Against Women. 2001;7(1):60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Network of Women with Disabilities. Document on violence against women with disabilities. 2010. URL: http://inwwd.wordpress.com/publications-of-the-inwwd/
  13. 13.
    Sedlak AJ, Mettenburg J, Basena M, Petta I, McPherson K, Greene A, Li S. Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS–4): report to congress, executive summary. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families; 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spencer N, Devereux E, Wallace A, Sundrum R, Shenoy M, Bacchus C, Logan S. Disabling conditions and registration for child abuse and neglect: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2005;116:609–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turner HA, Vanderminden J, Finkelhor D, Hamby S, Shattuck A. Disability and victimization in a national sample of children and youth. Child Maltreat. 2001;16:275–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children Youth and Families. Child maltreatment 2005–2011. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2007–2012.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Council on Disability. Rocking the cradle: ensuring the rights of parents with disabilities and their children. Washington, DC: NCD; 2012.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGaw S, Scully T, Pritchard C. Predicting the unpredictable? Identifying high-risk versus low-risk parents with intellectual disabilities. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34:699–710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tymchuk AJ. Predicting adequacy of parenting by people with mental retardation. Child Abuse Negl. 1992;16(2):165–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lightfoot E, Hill K, LaLiberte T. The inclusion of disability as a condition for termination of parental rights. Child Abuse Negl. 2010;34:927–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frasier LD. Abusive head trauma in infants and young children: a unique contributor to developmental disabilities. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55:1269–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keenan HT, Runyan DK, Marshall SW, Nocera MA, Merten DF, Sinal SH. A population-based study of inflicted traumatic brain injury in young children. JAMA. 2003;290:621–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hagberg B, Hagberg G. The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden: 5. The birth year period 1979–82. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1989;78:283–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Copel LC. Partner abuse in physically disabled women: a proposed model for understanding intimate partner violence. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2006;42(2):114–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walker LE. The battered woman. New York: Harper Colophon Books; 1979.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gilson SF, Cramer EP, Depoy E. (Re)Defining abuse of women with disabilities: a paradox of limitation and expansion. Affilia. 2001;16:220–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Milberger S, Israel N, LeRoy B, Martin A, Potter L, Patchak-Schuster P. Brief report: violence against women with disabilities. Violence Vict. 2003;18(5):581–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Curry MA, Renker P, Robinson-Whelan S, Hughes R, Swank PR, Oschwald M, Powers LE. Facilitators and barriers to disclosing abuse among women with disabilities. Violence Vict. 2011;26(4):430–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hershokowitz D, Lamb ME, Horowitz D. Victimization of children with disabilities. Am J Orthopsychiatr. 2013;77(4):629–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Poole DA, Lamb ME. Investigative interviews of children: a guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ballard MB, Austin S. Forensic interviewing: special considerations for children and adolescents with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Educ Train Ment Retard Dev Disabil. 1999;34(4):521–5.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cederborg A, Lamb ME. How does the legal system respond when children with learning difficulties are victimized? Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30(5):537–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Henry LA, Bettenay C, Carney DPJ. Children with intellectual disabilities and developmental disorders. In: Lamb ME, La Rooy DJ, Malloy LC, Katz C, editors. Children’s testimony. A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 251–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Anderson J, Heath R. Forensic interviews of children who have developmental disabilities, Part 1 of 2. National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse Update. 2006;19(1):3–12.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anderson J, Heath R. Forensic interviews of children who have developmental disabilities, Part 2 of 2. National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse Update. 2006;19(2):73–95.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Llewellyn A, Hogan K. The use and abuse models of disability. Disabil Soc. 2000;15:157–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Finlay WM, Lyons E. Acquiescence in interviews with people who have mental retardation. Ment Retard. 2002;40:14–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Matthews E, Saywitz R. Child victim witness manual. Calif Cent Judicial Educ Res J. 1992;12:5–81.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. Guidelines for the use of anatomical dolls. Chicago: Author; 1995.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heckler S. Facilitated communication: a response by child protection. Child Abuse Negl. 1994;18(6):495–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ericson K, Perlman N, Isaacs B. Witness competency, communication issues and people with developmental disabilities. Dev Disabil Bull. 1994;22(2):101–9.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Balderian NJ, Coleman TF, Stream J. Abuse of people with disabilities: Victims and their families speak out, A report on the 2012 National Survey on Abuse of People with Disabilities. Disability Abuse Project. Los Angeles: Spectrum Institute; 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent J. Palusci
    • 1
  • Ellen L. Datner
    • 2
  • Christine Wilkins
    • 3
  1. 1.New York University School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Frances L Loeb Child Protection and Development CenterBellevue HospitalNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.New York University, Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations