Context in Ontology for Knowledge Representation

  • Asmaa Chebba
  • Thouraya Bouabana-Tebibel
  • Stuart H. Rubin
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 358)

Abstract

The ontology represents a rich model for knowledge representation that is gaining popularity over years. Its expressivity and computability promote its use in a large scale of applications. In this paper, we first present a meta-model that describes the ontology basic elements and the relationships among them. A new element is introduced to the ontology model called “Context”. This new conceptual element improves the representation quality and allows for the modeling of more complex knowledge efficiently. The context is next integrated to the proposed meta-model.

Keywords

ontology meta-model context knowledge representation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Staab, S., Maedche, A.: Axioms are Objects, too – Ontology Engineering beyond the Modeling of Concepts and Relations. In: 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Method, Berlin, Germany (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford University, Stanford (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    OMG, “Ontology definition metamodel”, OMG adopted specification, Version 1.0, OMG Document Number: formal/2009-05-01 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zainol, Z., Nakat, K.: Generic context ontology modelling: A review and framework. In: IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computer Technology and Development (ICCTD 2010), Piscataway, NJ, pp. 126–130 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bechhofer, S., Harmelen, F.V., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beckett, D., McBride, B.: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). W3C Recommendation (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coma, C., Cuppens-Boulahia, N., Cuppens, F., Cavalli, A.N.: Context Ontology for Secure Interoperability. In: 2008 Third International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 821–827. IEEE Computer Security (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gu, T., Wang, X.H., Pung, H.K., Zhang, D.Q.: Ontology Based Context Modeling and Reasoning using OWL. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation Conference (CNDS 2004), San Diego, CA, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strimpakou, M.A., Roussaki, L.G., Anagnostou, M.E.: A Context Ontology for Pervasive Service Provision. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pp. 775–779 (2006), doi:10.1109/AINA.2006.15Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., Harmelen, F.V., Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Contextualizing ontologies. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 1(4), 325–343 (2004), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    OMG, “Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification Version 2.0”, http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/
  13. 13.
    OMG, “Ontology Definition Metamodel Request for Proposal”, OMG Document ad/2003-03-40 in [4] (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asmaa Chebba
    • 1
  • Thouraya Bouabana-Tebibel
    • 1
  • Stuart H. Rubin
    • 2
  1. 1.LCSI LaboratoryÉcole Nationale Supérieure d’InformatiqueAlgiersAlgeria
  2. 2.SSC-PAC 71730San DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations