First Results About Motivation and Impact of License Changes in Open Source Projects

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 451)

Abstract

Free and open source software is characterized by the freedoms and criteria that are warranted by specific licenses. These licenses describe the rights and duties of the licensors and licensees. However, a licensing change may be necessary in the life of an open source project to meet legal developments or to allow the implementation of new business models. This paper examines the motivations and impacts of license changes in open source projects. After a state of the art on the subject, a set of case studies where projects changed their license is presented. Then a set of motivations to change licenses, the ways to legally make this change, the problems caused by this change and a set of benefits of the license change are discussed.

Keywords

Open source Intellectual property License Contributor agreement Business model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bert-Erboul, C.: VideoLan: un cas d’école dans l’industrie informatique. Revue Terminal, pp. 117-133 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Laat, P.B.: Copyright or copyleft ? An analysis of property regimes for software development. Research Policy 34, 1511–1532 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Penta, M., et al.: An exploratory study of the evolution of software licensing. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 1. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogel, K.: Producing open source software: How to run a successful free software project. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    KDE, Projects/KDE Relicensing. https://techbase.kde.org/Projects/KDE_Relicensing (read: January 17, 2015)
  6. 6.
    Hamerly, J., Paquin, T.: Freeing the source: the story of mozilla. In: Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O’Reilly, January 1999Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hofmann, G., Riehle, D., Kolassa, C., Mauerer, W.: A dual model of open source license growth. In: Petrinja, E., Succi, G., El Ioini, N., Sillitti, A. (eds.) OSS 2013. IFIP AICT, vol. 404, pp. 245–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mozilla, Mozilla Relicensing FAQ - Version 1.1. http://www-archive.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html (read: January 14, 2015)
  9. 9.
    Santos Jr., C.D., et al.: Intellectual property policy and attractiveness: a longitudinal study of free and open source software projects. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Savola, S., Anttila, O.: Open Source Software License Changes, Open Source Software Development Seminars (November 22, 2012). https://wiki.oulu.fi/download/attachments/28092087/ossd_2012_savola_anttila.pdf (read: January 15, 2015)
  11. 11.
    St. Laurent, A.M.: Understanding Open Source and Free Software Licensing. O’Reilly Media (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Välimäki, M.: Dual licensing in open source software industry. Systèmes d’Information et Management 8(1), 63–75 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Viseur, R.: Fork impacts and motivations in free open source projects. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 3, 117–122 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viseur, R.: Evolution des stratégies et modèles d’affaires des éditeurs Open Source face au Cloud computing. Revue Terminal 113-114Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Viseur, R.: Identifying success factors for the mozilla project. In: Petrinja, E., Succi, G., El Ioini, N., Sillitti, A. (eds.) OSS 2013. IFIP AICT, vol. 404, pp. 45–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Willis, N.: Relicensing VLC from GPL to LGPL, LWN.net (November 21, 2012). http://lwn.net/Articles/525718/ (read: January 15, 2015)

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CETICCharleroiBelgium
  2. 2.University of Mons (Faculty of Engineering)MonsBelgium
  3. 3.Universidad Rey Juan CarlosFuenlabradaSpain

Personalised recommendations