The Multidimensional Nature and Dynamic Transformation of European Borders and Internal Security

  • Raphael Bossong
  • Helena Carrapico


The introductory chapter provides a brief overview of the current political and operational challenges faced by the European Union in internal security. We are confronted with an unprecedented degree of controversy, politicization and pace of change with regard to migration and border security issues, while other internal security concerns, such as the fight against terrorism, remain on the agenda. The chapter then turns to the possible consequences of such transformation for academic study, and proposes an analytical focus on practices and diverse sites of implementation, as opposed to the traditionally dominant concern with policy-making dynamics in Brussels. In this context, we refer to borders and bordering processes as multi-dimensional phenomena that permeate spaces within and beyond the territory of the EU. Finally, the introductory chapter elaborates on the three organizing themes of technology, externalisation and accountability, which provide a fruitful cross-cutting, perspective on the increasing empirical complexity of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Finally, each individual contribution to this volume is shortly reviewed under these three respective headings to support mutual dialogue and point out further research perspectives.


European Union Border policy Internal security Technology Externalization Accountability 


  1. Aas, K. F. (2011). Crimmigrant’bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajana, B. (2013). Asylum, identity management and biometric control. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26(4), 576–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amnesty International. (2015). The global refugee crisis—A conspiracy of neglect. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  4. Avramopoulos, D. (2015, August 14). A European response to migration: Showing solidarity and sharing. European Commission speech. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  5. Balzacq, T. (2009). The external dimension of EU justice and home affairs: Governance, neighbours, security. Basingstoke England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balzacq, T., & Carrera, S. (2006). Security versus freedom—A challenge for Europe’s future. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bigo, D. (2000). New officers in the European security field. In J. Sheptycki (Ed.), Issues in transnational policing (pp. 67–99). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bigo, D. (2014). The (in) securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control: Military/Navy–border guards/police–database analysts. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bigo, D., & Guild, E. (2005). La logique du visa Schengen: Police à distance. Cultures and Conflits, 14.Google Scholar
  10. Bigo, D., et al. (2015). The EU counter-terrorism policy responses to the attacks in Paris: Towards an EU security and liberty agenda. Brussels: CEPS liberty and security in Europe. 81/February.Google Scholar
  11. Bono, G. (2006). Challenges of democratic oversight of EU security policies. European Security, 15(4), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Börzel, T. A., & Van Hüllen, V. (2014). One voice, one message, but conflicting goals: Cohesiveness and consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(7), 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bossong, R., & Rhinard, M. (Eds.) (forthcoming). Theorising EU internal security cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brady, H. (2014). Mare Europeum? Tackling mediterranean migration. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Broeders, D. (2007). The new digital borders of Europe EU databases and the surveillance of irregular migrants. International Sociology, 22(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buess, M. (2015). European Union agencies and their management boards: An assessment of accountability and demoi-cratic legitimacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(1), 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bundesregierung, die Deutsche (2015, August 16). Refugee policy: Finding common answers. Merkel ZDF interview. Accessed October 20, 2015, from = 392660
  19. Busuioc, M., & Groenleer, M. (2013). Beyond design: The evolution of Europol and Eurojust. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14(3), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Calderoni, F. (2010). Organised Crime Legislation in the European Union: Harmonization and approximation of criminal law, national legislation and the EU framework decision on the fight against organised crime. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrapico, H. (2014). Analysing the European Union’s responses to organized crime through the different lenses of securitization theory. European Security, 23(4), 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carrera, S., & Den Hertog, L. (2015). Whose mare? Rule of law challenges in the field of European border surveillance in the mediterranean. CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe 79/January.Google Scholar
  23. Carrera, S., et al. (2013). The peculiar nature of EU Home Affairs agencies in migration control: Beyond accountability versus autonomy? European Journal of Migration and Law, 15(4), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cornelius, W. A. (2001). Death at the border: Efficacy and unintended consequences of US immigration control policy. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 661–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Côté-Boucher, K., et al. (2014). Border security as practice: An agenda for research. Security Dialogue, 45(3), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Council of the European Union. (2008). European best practice guidelines for police and customs cooperation centres (Document 13815/08).Google Scholar
  27. Cremona, M., Monar, J., & Poli, S. (2011). The external dimension of the European union’s area of freedom, security and justice. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Curtin, D. (2014). Overseeing secrets in the EU: A democratic perspective. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(3), 684–700.Google Scholar
  29. Day, K. (2015, July 27). These are refugees, not migrants, arriving in their thousands on Greek Shores. The Guardian. Accessed August 22, 2015, from
  30. De Bruycker, P., Di Bartolomeo, A., & Fargues, P. (2013). Migrants smuggled by sea to the EU: Facts, laws and policy options. MPC Research Report 2013/09. San Domenico di Fiesole: Migration Policy Centre–European University Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Delanty, G. (2006). Borders in a changing Europe: Dynamics of openness and closure. Comparative European Politics, 4(2–3), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Den Boer, M. (2013). How to police a porous fortress? Journal of Police Studies/Cahiers Politiestudies, 1(1), 2–20.Google Scholar
  33. Dubnick, M. (2014). Accountability as cultural keyword. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 23–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Eder, F. (2011). The European Union’s counter-terrorism policy towards the Maghreb: Trapped between democratisation, economic interests and the fear of destabilisation. European Security, 20(3), 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eriksen, E. O. (2011). Governance between expertise and democracy: The case of European security. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(8), 1169–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eur-Lex. (2014). EU internal security strategy—EUR-Lex. Accessed October 20, 2015, from URISERV:jl0050
  37. European Commission. (2015a, April 28). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—The European Agenda on Security. COM (2015) 185 final.Google Scholar
  38. European Commission. (2015b, May 13). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—A European Agenda on Migration. COM (2015) 240 final.Google Scholar
  39. European Commission. (2015c). Refugee crisis—Q&A on emergency relocation. Accessed October 20, 2015, from
  40. European Parliament. (2015, April 23). Schulz: Lack of European migration policy is turning Mediterranean into a graveyard. Press releases. REF 20150423STO45411. Accessed August 24, 2015 from“Lack-of-European-migration-policy-turning-Mediterranean-into-graveyard
  41. Fargues, P., & Bonfanti, S. (2014). When the best option is a leaky boat: Why migrants risk their lives crossing the Mediterranean and what Europe is doing about it. San Domenico di Fiesole: Migration Policy Centre-European University Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Fox News. (2015, June 18). Merkel presses EU partners to share burden of hosting refugees, says all have responsibility. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  43. Frontex. (2015a). Risk analysis 2015 (N° 4613/ 2015). Warsaw.Google Scholar
  44. Frontex. (2015b, August 18). Number of migrants in one month above 100 000 for first time. Accessed August 21, 2015, from
  45. Frontex. (2015c, June 26). Frontex expands its joint operation Triton. News. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  46. Gailmard, S. (2014). Accountability and principal-agent models. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 90–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Gower, M., & Smith, B. (2015, July 9). Mediterranean boat people. Briefing Paper House of Commons, CBP 7210.Google Scholar
  48. Guiraudon, V. (2003). The constitution of a European immigration policy domain: A political sociology approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2011). New modes of governance and democratic accountability. Government and Opposition, 46(1), 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. House of Lords. (2014). Written answer to question by Lord Hylton. HL 1977. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  51. Huff, A. (2015). Executive privilege reaffirmed? Parliamentary scrutiny of the CFSP and CSDP. West European Politics, 38(2), 396–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huysmans, J. (2004). A Foucaultian view on spill-over: Freedom and security in the EU. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(3), 294–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. IOM. (2011). Glossary on migration (International migration law series, Vol. 25). Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  54. IOM. (2014). Fatal journeys—Tracking lives lost during migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  55. Katsiaficas, C. (2014). Search and rescue operations in the mediterranean—The role of Frontex Plus (EU Migration Policy Working Paper, 13). Bridging Europe.Google Scholar
  56. Kaunert, C. (2005). The area of freedom, security and justice: The construction of a “European public order”. European Security, 14(4), 459–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaunert, C., & Zwolski, K. (2013). The EU as a global security actor—A comprehensive analysis beyond CFSP and JHA. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. König-Archibugi, M. (2010). Accountability in transnational relations: How distinctive is it? West European Politics, 33(5), 1142–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lavenex, S. (2006). Shifting up and out: The foreign policy of European immigration control. West European Politics, 29(2), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lavenex, S., & Wagner, W. (2007). Which European public order? Sources of imbalance in the European area of freedom, security and justice. European Security, 16(3–4), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leese, M. (2014). The new profiling: Algorithms, black boxes, and the failure of anti-discriminatory safeguards in the European Union. Security Dialogue, 45(5), 494–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lowenthal, A. F., & Bertucci, M. E. (2014). Scholars, policymakers, and international affairs: Finding common cause. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  63. Lutterbeck, D. (2005). Blurring the dividing line: The convergence of internal and external security in Western Europe. European Security, 14(2), 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Merlingen, M. (2007). Everything is dangerous: A critique of ‘normative power Europe’. Security Dialogue, 38(4), 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Miklin, E. (2014). From ‘Sleeping Giant’ to left–right politicization? National Party Competition on the EU and the Euro Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1199–1206.Google Scholar
  66. Monar, J. (2001). The dynamics of justice and home affairs: Laboratories, driving factors and costs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 747–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Monar, J. (2012). Die Gewährleistung innerer Sicherheit durch die Europäische Union: Grundlagen, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. In T. C. G. Würtenberger & H.-J. Lange (Eds.), Innere Sicherheit im europäischen Vergleich (pp. 33–56). Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  68. MSF. (2015, August 19). Mediterranean migration. Accessed August 22, 2015, from
  69. Mulholland, R. (2015, July 5). Calais crisis: Bicycle repair shops, mosques anda n orthodox church—the town where migrants wait to cross to Britain. The Telegraph. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  70. Neal, A. W. (2009). Securitization and risk at the EU border: The origins of FRONTEX. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 333–356.Google Scholar
  71. Newkirk, A. B. (2010). The rise of the fusion-intelligence complex: A critique of political surveillance after 9/11. Surveillance & Society, 8(1), 43–60.Google Scholar
  72. Neyer, J. (2012). The justification of Europe: A political theory of supranational integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Occhipinti, J. D. (2014). Whither the withering democratic deficit? The impact of the Lisbon treaty on the area of freedom, security and justice. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(1), 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Papadopoulos, Y. (2010). Accountability and multi-level governance: More accountability, less democracy? West European Politics, 33(5), 1030–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Park, J. (2015, April 23). Europe’s migration crisis. Council on foreign relations. Accessed August 23, 2015 from
  76. Pollack, J., & Slominski, P. (2009). Experimentalist but not accountable governance? The role of Frontex in managing the EU’s External Borders. West European Politics, 32(5), 904–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ripoll Servent, A. (2015). Institutional and policy change in the European parliament: Deciding on freedom, security and justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rozell, M. J. (1994). Executive privilege: The dilemma of secrecy and democratic accountability. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rumford, C. (2012). Towards a multiperspectival study of borders. Geopolitics, 17(4), 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Scholten, M. (2014). The political accountability of EU and US independent regulatory agencies. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Traynor, I. (2015, June 25). European leaders scrap plans for migrant quota system. The Guardian. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  82. UK Government. (2015, October 8). Syria refugees. UK Government Response. Accessed October 21, 2015, from
  83. UNHCR. (2015). Global trends 2014—World at war. Geneva.Google Scholar
  84. United Nations. (1951). Geneva convention. Geneva.Google Scholar
  85. Verburgt, L. (2012). A plea for technological activism at the European borders. Science as Culture, 21(3), 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Waever, O. (1993). Securitization and desecuritization. Copenhagen: Centre for Peace and Conflict Research.Google Scholar
  87. Wasik, Z., & Foy, H. (2015, August 21). ‘Poland favours christian refugees from Syria’. Financial Times. Accessed August 24, 2015, from
  88. Wolff, S. (2014). The politics of negotiating EU readmission agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey. European Journal of Migration and Law, 16(1), 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wouters, J., & Raube, K. (2012). Seeking CSDP accountability through interparliamentary scrutiny. The International Spectator, 47(4), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Europe University ViadrinaFrankfurt OderGermany
  2. 2.School of Languages and Social SciencesAston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations