Towards a Harmonized Framework for Calculating Logistics Carbon Footprint

Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

Internal and external pressures on the various stakeholders in the transportation of goods have resulted in a wide range of operational choices and a proliferation in the way in which their success can be assessed. Environmental impacts form only one part of the decision making process, alongside cost, promptness, reliability, safety etc. However, having recognised the place of the environment, and particularly the carbon footprint, within such decisions it is crucial to have a reliable and consistent method as an input to the process. Such a method must be harmonized to allow comparable calculations to be made for the wide range of modes, vehicle types and operational characteristics that may be used along current global supply chains. It must also be acceptable in terms of input required, accuracy and comprehension to those who use it, including policy makers who set global targets and monitor overall progress. Significant progress has been made to develop and start to implement such a harmonized methodology framework from a highly fragmented starting point, although much remains to be done. This paper reflects the work to date and the approach to the next steps that are already underway.

Keywords

Carbon footprint Logistics efficiency Calculation methodology 

References

  1. Arrêté du 10 avril 2012 pris pour l’application de l’article 14 du décret n° 2011-1336 du 24 octobre 2011 relatif à l’information sur la quantité de dioxyde de carbone émise à l’occasion d’une prestation de transport. http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000025706344
  2. Auvinen H, Makela K, Lischke A, Burmeister A, de Ree D, Ton J (2011) COFRET Deliverable 2.1. Methods and tools for calculation of carbon footprint of transport and logisticsGoogle Scholar
  3. Auvinen H, Clausen U, Davydenko, I, de Ree D, Diekmann D, Ehrler V, Lewis A, Ton J (2013) Calculating emissions along supply chains—towards the development of a harmonized methodology. In: 13th WCTR, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanco E (2014) Assessing global freight emission methodologies. GLEC Strategy Annex, Smart Freight CentreGoogle Scholar
  5. Davydenko I, Ehrler V, de Ree D, Lewis A, Tavasszy L (2014) Towards a global CO2 calculation standard for supply chains: suggestions for methodological improvements. 93rd Annual meeting Transportation Research Board (TRB), 12–16 Jan 2014, Washington, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  6. International Transport Forum (2013) ITF Transport outlook 2013: funding transport. http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/transport/itf-transport-outlook-2013_9789282103937-en#page1
  7. ISO (2015) International harmonized method(s) for a coherent quantification of CO2e emissions of freight transport. ISO IWA #16. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=67844
  8. Smart Freight Global Framework for Action (2015) http://www.smartfreightcentre.org/main/info/downloads
  9. World Economic Forum/Accenture (2009) Supply chain decarbonisation. World Economic Forum, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Transport & Travel Research LtdNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Smart Freight CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations