Life in Terms of Nano-biotechnologies

Chapter
Part of the Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology book series (ESSSAT)

Abstract

Classical biology seeks to analyze living systems, their structures, functions and history. What is studied is not life directly, but the living entities through which life expresses itself. And this is in terms of functionalities of the living, which is a perfectly legitimate reduction in a scientific framework, as long as it is a conscious process which does not limit the view on living, and moreover on life, to functionalities. Synthetic biology, combined with nano-biotechnology, uses the discoveries of classical biology for the development of synthetic pieces of living material, and tries to reproduce the essential functions of life. Its goal is also to produce forms of living that nature itself has not yet produced. This vision of life is questionable, not only in philosophy (i.e. in terms of the classical distinction between functionality and experiences), at the epistemological level, but also in science itself, where the influence of experience on the functionalities of life starts to be investigated. For instance, in epigenetic phenomena, gene expression is influenced by the environment and by the behavior of the individuals carrying these genes; and also in brain plasticity, the development of synapses is affected by the practice of brain functions or by the re-education of these functions. These new findings suggest that life is a unity, at least at the physical, psychical and even spiritual levels for the human being. Respect for the living and for life must take into account this unity, which can also become a criterion for evaluating and discerning a “humanizing” use of nano-biotechnologies – for medical applications, for example.

Keywords

Nano-biotechnology Unity Functionality Biology-bricks Emergence Living Life Artificial life Synthetic biology Bioethics Vulnerability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Augustine. 1937. Confessions livres IX–XIII. Texte établi et traduit par Pierre de Labriolle. Tome II, deuxième édition revue et corrigée. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  2. Baertschi, B. 2009. La vie artificielle. Berne: OFCL.Google Scholar
  3. Bensaude-Vincent, B. 2009. Les vertiges de la technoscience. Paris: Editions de La Découverte.Google Scholar
  4. Besnier, J.-M. 2009. Demain, les Posthumains. Paris: Hachette Littératures.Google Scholar
  5. d’Aquin, Thomas. 2000. Somme contre les Gentils I, Dieu. Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.Google Scholar
  6. D’Ornellas, P. 2010. Dignité et vulnérabilité. Doc. Episcopat, cef, N°6.Google Scholar
  7. De Rosnay, J., and F. Papillon. 2010. Et l’homme créa la vie, La folle aventure des architectes et des bricoleurs du vivant. Paris: LLL.Google Scholar
  8. Gibson, D.G. et al. 2010. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329: 52–56. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/329/5987/52.full.pdf . Accessed 6 Apr 2012.
  9. Habermas, J. 2002. L’avenir de la nature humaine, vers un eugénisme libéral? Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Henry, M. 1996. C’est moi la vérité. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. Jacob, F. 2000. Qu’est-ce que la vie? In Qu’est-ce que la vie? vol. 3, ed. Y. Michaud, 23–26. Paris: O. Jacob.Google Scholar
  12. Jonas, H. [1979] 1997. Le Principe Responsabilité, Une éthique pour la civilisation technologique. Paris: Les éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
  13. Lacroix, X. 2007. De chair et de parole. Paris: Bayard.Google Scholar
  14. Levinas, E. 1982. Ethique et Infini. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  15. Maestrutti, M. 2008. L’imaginaire du corps dans les nanotechnologies, entre mythe et utopie. In Bionano-éthique, ed. B. Bensaude-Vincent, R. Larrère, V. Nurock, and S. Loeve, 143–155. Paris: Vuibert. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  16. Magnin, T. 1998. Entre science et religion. Monaco: Le Rocher.Google Scholar
  17. Magnin, T., and V. Grégoire-Delory. 2011. Réflexion d’un physicien sur la notion d’émergence appliquée à la relation corps-esprit. Connaître 35: 54–62.Google Scholar
  18. Nordmann, A. 2004. Converging technologies. Shaping the future of European societies. Bruxelles: European Union High Level Expert Group.Google Scholar
  19. Pichot, A. 1993. Histoire de la notion de vie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  20. Richard, A. (ed.). 2010. Le cerveau, comment il se réorganise sans cesse [special issue], Les dossiers de La Recherche, vol. 40. Paris: Sophia Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Roco, M., and W. Bainbridge. 2002. NSF/DOC-sponsored report. Arlington.Google Scholar
  22. Sicard, D. 2005. Le corps en pièces détachées. Enjeux scientifiques, économiques et philosophiques. Les Tribunes de la santé 6: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simondon, G. [1958] 2001. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubin.Google Scholar
  24. Théobald C. 2010. Recherches de Science Religieuse. Dossier: La théologie de la nature en débat 98/2.Google Scholar
  25. Zielinski, A. 2010. L’éthique du care. Etudes 4136: 631–641.Google Scholar
  26. Zundel, M. 1947. Itinéraires. Paris: Ed La Colombe.Google Scholar
  27. Zundel, M. 1998. Poème de la Sainte Liturgie. Paris: DDB.Google Scholar
  28. Zundel, M. 2005. Pierres de Fondation. Paris: Anne Sigier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Catholic University of LyonLyonFrance

Personalised recommendations