Economic and Environmental Trade-Offs in Water Transportation
In recent years slow steaming has resurfaced as a fuel saving measure allowing ship owners to significantly cut operational costs. Reduced fuel consumption leads to lower levels of greenhouse gases and pollutant emissions. Port authorities have considered offering incentives to ship operators that significantly reduce sailing speed in the port proximity, as a means to improve local air quality. This chapter conducts a literature review on emissions modelling methodologies for maritime transport and develops a framework that allows the estimation of pollutant emissions under different sailing scenarios. The chapter presents existing regulations and port initiatives that aim to reduce maritime emissions. The merits of localised slow steaming near the calling port for various case studies including different ship size, trip distance, sailing speed and fuel policies in place are examined. An activity based methodology is used to estimate fuel consumption and emissions savings during lower sailing speed operation for machinery on-board. Fuel price and the value of time lost govern the extent to which slow steaming and local speed reductions can be effective. The economic and environmental trade-offs occurring at different sailing speeds are discussed from the perspective of both the ship operator and the port authority considering the implications of regulatory policies such as the expansion of Emission Control Areas (ECA). The chapter concludes with a set of guidelines to port authorities on designing attractive speed reduction programmes, and recommendations to shipping companies on improving fuel efficiency across their schedule when such programmes are available.
KeywordsShipping emissions Emission control areas Speed optimization Environmental trade-offs Speed limits
- California Air Resources Board. (2012). Ocean-going vessels—Fuel rule. Accessed July, 2013, from http://www.arb.ca.gov/ports/marinevess/ogv.htm.
- Corbett, J. J., & Koehler, H. W. (2003). Updated emissions from ocean shipping. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 108(D20).Google Scholar
- Corbett, J. J., Wang, H., & Winebrake, J. J. (2009). The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593–598.Google Scholar
- Dolphin, M. J. & Melcer, M. (2008). Estimation of ship dry air emissions. Naval Engineers Journal 120(3), 27–36.Google Scholar
- Endresen, Ø., Sørgård, E., Behrens, H. L., Brett, P. O., & Isaksen, I. S. (2007). A historical reconstruction of ships' fuel consumption and emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 112(D12).Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2000). Analysis of commercial marine vessels emissions and fuel consumption data. Accessed March 2012, from http://www.epa.gov/oms/models/nonrdmdl/c-marine/r00002.pdf.
- European Commission. (2005). Directive 2005/33/EC amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels. Accessed May 2013, from http://www.ops.wpci.nl/_images/_downloads/_original/1264149906_2005eudirectivesulphurcontentofmarinefuels2005_33.pdf.
- European Commission and ENTEC UK Limited. (2002). Quantification of emissions from ships associated with ship movements between ports in the European Community. European Commission, DG ENV.C1, Rue de la Loi, 200, B-1049: Brussels.Google Scholar
- Eyring, V., Köhler, H. W., van Aardenne, J., Lauer, A. (2005). Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110(D17).Google Scholar
- Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T., & Rasch, P. J. (2007). Present‐day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 112(D11).Google Scholar
- International Energy Agency. (2012). Electricity/Heat by Country /Region, OECD Member Countries. Accessed July 2014, from http://www.iea.org/stats/prodresult.asp?PRODUCT=Electricity/Heat.
- International Maritime Organization. (1997). Annex VI prevention of air pollution from ships (entered into force 19 May 2005).Google Scholar
- International Maritime Organization. (2014). Third IMO GHG Study 2014.Google Scholar
- Kontovas, C. A., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2009). An online ship emissions calculator as a decision-making aid and policy evaluation tool. In 13th Congress of International Maritime Association of Mediterranean IMAM (pp. 12–15).Google Scholar
- Linder, A. J. (2014). Explaining participation in voluntary vessel emission reduction programs at the ports of los angeles and long beach. In Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting (No. 14-1158).Google Scholar
- Lloyds Register Engineering Services (1999). ‘Marine exhaust emissions quantification study—mediterranean sea’, Report 99/EE/7044, Lloyds Register Engineering Services, London: UK.Google Scholar
- MAN Diesel A/S. (2009). Low container ship speed facilitated by versatile ME/ME-C engines. Accessed May 2013, from http://www.mandieselturbo.com/files/news/filesof8410/5510-0038-04.pdf.
- Port of Los Angeles. (2013). Inventory of air emissions—2012. Accessed March 2014, from http://www.portoflosangeles.org/pdf/2012_Air_Emissions_Inventory.pdf.
- Trozzi, C., & Vaccaro, R. (1998). Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from ships. Techne report MEET RF98.Google Scholar
- UNCTAD (2013). Review of maritime transport 2013. Accessed November 2014, from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2013_en.pdf.
- Wang, C., Corbett, J. J., & Firestone, J. (2007). Modeling energy use and emissions from north american shipping: application of the ship traffic, energy, and environment model. Environmental science & technology, 41(9), 3226−3232.Google Scholar