Advertisement

Size of Sets with Small Sensitivity: A Generalization of Simon’s Lemma

  • Andris Ambainis
  • Jevgēnijs VihrovsEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9076)

Abstract

We study the structure of sets \(S\subseteq \{0, 1\}^n\) with small sensitivity. The well-known Simon’s lemma says that any \(S\subseteq \{0, 1\}^n\) of sensitivity \(s\) must be of size at least \(2^{n-s}\). This result has been useful for proving lower bounds on the sensitivity of Boolean functions, with applications to the theory of parallel computing and the “sensitivity vs. block sensitivity” conjecture.

In this paper we take a deeper look at the size of such sets and their structure. We show an unexpected “gap theorem”: if \(S\subseteq \{0, 1\}^n\) has sensitivity \(s\), then we either have \(|S|=2^{n-s}\) or \(|S|\ge \frac{3}{2} 2^{n-s}\).

This provides new insights into the structure of low sensitivity subsets of the Boolean hypercube \(\{0, 1\}^n\).

References

  1. 1.
    Ambainis, A., Bavarian, M., Gao, Y., Mao, J., Sun, X., Zuo, S.: Tighter relations between sensitivity and other complexity measures. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds.) ICALP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8572, pp. 101–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ambainis, A., Prūsis, K., Vihrovs, J.: Sensitivity versus Certificate Complexity of Boolean Functions. Preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07691
  3. 3.
    Ambainis, A., Sun, X.: New separation between \(s(f)\) and \(bs(f)\). CoRR, abs/1108.3494 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beals, R., Buhrman, H., Cleve, R., Mosca, M., de Wolf, R.: Quantum lower bounds by polynomials. J. ACM 48(4), 778–797 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Complexity measures and decision tree complexity: a survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 288(1), 21–43 (2002). (Complexity and Logic)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green, B., Sanders, T.: Boolean functions with small spectral norm. Geom. Funct. Anal. 18(1), 144–162 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenyon, C., Kutin, S.: Sensitivity, block sensitivity, and \(\ell \)-block sensitivity of boolean functions. Info. Comput. 189(1), 43–53 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nisan, N.: CREW PRAMS and decision trees. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 1989, pp. 327–335. ACM, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nisan, N., Szegedy, M.: On the degree of boolean functions as real polynomials. Comput. Complex. 4(4), 301–313 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rubinstein, D.: Sensitivity vs. block sensitivity of boolean functions. combinatorica 15(2), 297–299 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simon, H.-U.: A tight \(\varOmega (\log \log N)\)-bound on the time for parallel Ram’s to compute nondegenerated boolean functions. In: Karpinski, M. (ed.) Foundations of Computation Theory. LNCS, vol. 158, pp. 439–444. Springer, Heidelberg (1983) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Virza, M.: Sensitivity versus block sensitivity of boolean functions. Inf. Process. Lett. 111(9), 433–435 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ComputingUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations