Advertisement

Wireless Nanosensors for Embedded Measurement in Concrete Structures

Conference paper
  • 2.5k Downloads

Abstract

In this work we propose a wireless architecture for embedded monitoring in concrete. The modular structure of the system allows it to be adapted to different types of sensors. We present the application of such architecture for the detection of microcracks in concrete. A carbon nanotube strain sensor recently developed by the group is used to track mechanical deformations. Full temperature compensation is achieved by a specific conditioning circuit.

Keywords

Wirelss SHM Embedded monitoring Carbon nanotubes Nanosensors Microcracks in concrete RFID sensor 

References

  1. 1.
    Lynch, J. P., et al. (2006). A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(2), 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harms, T., et al. (2010). Structural health monitoring of bridges using wireless sensor networks. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine, 13(6), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu, B., et al. (2013). Embedded piezoelectric sensors for health monitoring of concrete structures. ACI Materials Journal, 110, 149–158.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lebental, B., et al. (2010). Instrumentation of cementitious materials by embedded ultrasonic micro-transducers made of carbone nanotubes. Ph.D. thesis, East Paris University, Paris.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quinn, W., et al. (2012). Development of an embedded wireless sensing system for the monitoring of concrete. Structural Health Monitoring, 11(4), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    AMS. (2015). SL900A EPC Sensor Enterprise. Retrieved from: http://ams.com/eng%20/Products/UHF-RFID/UHF-Interface-and-Sensor-Tag/SL900A. Accessed on 26 April 2015
  7. 7.
    Wenzel, H. (2009). Health monitoring of bridges. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poornachandra, P., et al. (2013). Experimental investigation on corroded reinforced concrete beam in coastal environment using strain gauges. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, 3(5), 416–422.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haksoo, C., et al. (2008). Structural health monitoring system based on strain gauge enabled wireless sensor nodes. Proceeding of the Networked Sensing Systems, 211–214.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, W., et al. (2004). Interaction between micro-cracking, cracking, and reduced durability of concrete. Indiana: Purdue University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Michelis, F., et al. (2014). Wireless flexible strain sensor based on Carbon Nanotube piezoresistive networks for embedded measurement of strain in concrete. Proceedings of the EWSHM14, Nantes, pp. 1780–1787.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grassl, P., et al. (2010). Influence of aggregate size and volume fraction on shrinkage induced micro-cracking of concrete and mortar. Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 85–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris-Est, IFSTTAR, CosysMarne-la-ValléeFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de physique des interfaces et des couches minces (LPICM)CNRS: UMR7647 – PolytechniquePalaiseau CedexFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides (LMS)CNRS: UMR7649 – PolytechniquePalaiseau CedexFrance
  4. 4.ESYCOMUniversité Paris-EstMarne-la-Vallée cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations