Advertisement

To Define or Not to Define; Implications for the Governability of Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries in the Netherlands

  • Birgit De Vos
  • Marloes Kraan
Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 13)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the need to define the small-scale coastal fisheries sector in the Netherlands. It shows that the fact that there is no clear definition of what small-scale fisheries is, affects its governability. This seems to go hand in hand with the lack of a clear perspective on what the problems and opportunities of the small-scale fisheries sector are. This is partly because many small-scale métiers (‘metiers’ is commonly used to describe a fishing activity, which can be characterized by a combination of the area that is fished, the gear that is used, and the species that is targeted (http://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/wordef/fishing-activity-metier)) are out of sight, as they are outside the bounds of data collected, or hidden in ‘default rest categories’ or because of lack of clear representation. We argue that the relative invisibility of the small-scale fishing sector in the Netherlands, its diversity, lack of representation, and the ‘preference’ for specialization of the governing system impacts on the governability of the small-scale fisheries in the Netherlands. In this chapter we apply the theory of interactive governance by describing the governing system and the system-to-be-governed as well as the governing interactions between them to analyze the challenges for small-scale fisheries in the Netherlands.

Keywords

Definition Governability Small-Scale Fisheries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ratana and Svein for their valuable comments and suggestions that have improved the chapter considerably. Our gratitude also goes to Floor Quirijns from Imares, the interviewees, the fishers from the knowledge circles and the two anonymous reviewers who did a very thorough job in reviewing this chapter.

References

  1. AER. (2013). Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) – The 2013 annual economic report on the EU Fishing Fleet (STECF-13-15, 302 pp.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  2. Carvalhoa, N., Edwards-Jones, G., & Isidro, E. (2011). Defining scale in fisheries: Small versus large-scale fishing operations in the Azores. Fisheries Research, 109(2–3), 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chuenpagdee, R. (Ed.). (2011). World small-scale fisheries. Contemporary visions. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  4. EC. (2006). COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund. Retrieved from: http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eur65748.pdf
  5. EC. (2009). Green paper. Reform of the common fisheries policy.Google Scholar
  6. FAO. (2003). Report on the second session of the working party on small-scale fisheries. Advisory Committee on Fisheries Research (ACFR), FAO Report No. 735. Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  7. FAO. (2013). Technical consultation on international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  8. Ginkel, R. van (1991). Elk vist op zijn tij; een historisch-antropologische studie van een Zeeuwse maritieme gemeenschap, Yerseke 1870–1914, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ginkel, R. Van. (2009). Braving troubled waters: Sea change in a Dutch fishing community. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gualtherie van Weezel, T. (2014). Het keurmerk wordt (te) duur betaald. De Volkskrant 15 augustus 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Guyade, O., Berthout, P., Koutsikopoulos, C., Alban, F., Demaneche, S., Gaspar, M. B., Eschbaum, R., Fahy, E., Tully, O., Reynal, L., Curtil, O., Frangoudes, K., & Maynou, F. (2013). Small-scale fisheries in Europe: A comparative analysis based on a selection of case studies. Fisheries Research, 140, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Bundy, A., & Mahon, R. (2010). Pyramids and roses: Alternative images for the governance of fisheries systems. Marine Policy, 34(6), 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, D. S. (2006). Category, narrative, and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy, 30, 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, D., Bavinck, M., & Veitayaki, J. (2005). Fish capture. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, & R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An Introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  18. Kraan, M. (2009). Creating space for fishermen’s livelihoods: Anlo-Ewe beach seine fishermen’s negotiations for livelihood space within multiple governance structures in Ghana. Doctoral thesis. UvA, Amsterdam. Published by the African Study Centre in Leiden.Google Scholar
  19. Kraan, M., & Paaijmans, A. (2014). Notitie ‘Evaluatie Proefproject Groepsvorming vergunningen in de Geintegreerde Visserij’. BO Project 12.04-001-051. IMARES reference number: 14.IMA0360.Google Scholar
  20. Ministerie van Economische Zaken. (2013). Basislijst binnenberoep documenten per 01-08-2013. Retrieved from: http://www.combinatievanberoepsvissers.nl/downloads/lijst-beroepsvissers-binnenvisserij-per-1-augustus-2013.pdf
  21. Quirijns, F. (2010). Brede visie op duurzame visserij in de Waddenzee. Regionaal College WaddengebiedGoogle Scholar
  22. Seas at Risk. (2010). Activity report 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.seas-at-risk.org/1mages/2010%20Activity%20report%20summary%20for%20website.pdf
  23. Stichting Waddengroep. (2010). Standaards voor het duurzaam handmatig rapen van Japanse Oesters. Retrieved from: http://www.waddengroep.info/wadden-documenten-artikelen/Waddengoud-standaard-oesters-februari-2010.pdf
  24. Van Oostenbrugge, H., & Op De Weegh, J. (2014). Kleinschalige kustvisserij 2012. Rapportage aan enquêtedeelnemers. LEI, 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Visserijnieuws. (2013). Binnen –en kustvissers praten over eenwording. Retrieved from http://www.visserijnieuws.nl/component/content/article/70-archief-2011/8568-binnen-en-kustvissers-praten-over-eenwording.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEI Wageningen URWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.IMARES Wageningen URWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations