Institutional Logic and Legal Practice: Modes of Regulation of Religious Organizations in German Prisons

Chapter

Abstract

The chapter explores how the constitutionally guaranteed right of corporative religious freedom is negotiated in German prisons. It does so by looking at the regulatory factors, such as structural and legal conditions, and by studying the religious groups’ modes of negotiating. These negotiations take place under well-defined conditions set on the one hand by the legal state–church relationships in Germany, on the other, by the logic of specific prisons. The author concludes that the research on religion in prison, and on the relation of religion and law, should take place on various levels and from different perspectives, because there are several understandings of what is meant by ‘religion’, and several legal practices.

Keywords

Corporative religious freedom Institutional logic Germany Prison Legal practice Religious organization 

References

Monographs and Article

  1. Alex, M., & Feltes, Th. (2009). Von der Pathogenie des Strafvollzugs. In H.-J. Lange et al. (Ed.), Auf der Suche nach neuer Sicherheit. Fakten, Theorien und Folgen (pp. 89–102). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amir-Moazami, S. (2005). Muslim challenges to the secular consensus: A german case study. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 13(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becci, I. (2012). Imprisoned religion. Transformations of religion during and after imprisonment in Eastern Germany. Farnham, Surrey. England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Beckford, J. A. (2003). Social theory and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besier, G., & Besier, R.-M. (2001). Jehovah’s Witnesses request for recognition as a corporation under public law in Germany: background, current status, and empirical aspects. Journal of Church and State, 43(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornel, H. (2009). Resozialisierung. Handbuch. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  7. Glaeßner, G.-J. (2001). Sicherheit und Ordnung. Politisch-soziologische Reflexionen zu einem (wieder) aktuellen Thema. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 11(3), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaeßner, G.-J. (2002). Sicherheit und Freiheit. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 10(11), 3–13.Google Scholar
  9. Glaeßner, G.-J. (2003). Sicherheit in Freiheit. Die Schutzfunktion des demokratischen Staates und die Freiheit der Bürger. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  10. Glaeßner, G.-J. (2006). Security. In A. Harrington et al. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social theory New York (pp. 538–540). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  12. Haug, S., et al. (2009). Muslimisches Leben in Deutschland. Eine Studie im Auftrag der Deutschen Islamkonferenz. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
  13. Hobbes, Th. (2010 [1651]). Leviathan or the matter, forme, & power of a commonwealth ecclesiasticall and civill. New Haven: Yale University Press (reprint).Google Scholar
  14. Huber, W. (1999). Kirche in der Zeitenwende. Gesellschaftlicher Wandel und Erneuerung der Kirche. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
  15. Jahn, S. (2011). Gefängnisseelsorge in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In M. Klöcker et al. (Ed.), Handbuch der Religionen (pp. 1–31.). Landsberg/Lech: Olzog.Google Scholar
  16. Jahn, S. J. (2013). Religiöses Feld im rechtlichen Raum: Religion im Strafvollzug. In P. Antes et al. (Ed.), Konflikt - Integration - Religion. Religionswissenschaftliche Perspektiven (pp. 121–137.). Göttingen: V&R unipress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jahn, S. J. (2014). Zur (Un-)Möglichkeit „islamischer Seelsorge“ im deutschen Justizvollzug. Cibedo-Beiträge, (1), 20–25.Google Scholar
  18. Jähnichen, T. (2010). Caritas und Diakonie im „goldenen Zeitalter“ des Sozialstaates. Auf- und Umbrüche in den konfessionellen Wohlfahrtsverbänden in den 1960er Jahren. In T. Jähnichen (Ed.), Caritas und Diakonie imgoldenen Zeitalterdes bundesdeutschen Sozialstaats. Transformationen der konfessionellen Wohlfahrtsverbände in den 1960er Jahren (pp. 11–14). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  19. Kehrer, G. (1982). Organisierte religion. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  20. Kollman, P. (2011). At the origins of mission and missiology: A study in the dynamics of religious language. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 79(2), 425–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayring, Ph (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  22. Montesquieu, Ch.-L. (2006 [1748]). The spirit of laws. Cambridge et al., University Press (reprint).Google Scholar
  23. Robbers, G. (2001). Religious freedom in Germany. Brigham Young University Review, (2), 643–668.Google Scholar
  24. Schmitt, Th. (2012). Mosque debates as space-related, intercultural, and religious conflicts. In B. Becker-Cantarino (Ed.), Migration, religion, and Germany (pp. 207–217). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  25. Scott, W. R. (1999). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Sen, A. (1982). Choice, welfare, and measurement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith. Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sullivan, W. F. (2005). The impossibility of religious freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sullivan, W. F. (2009). Prison religion. Faith-based reform and the constitution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sykes, G. M. (2003). The society of captives. A study of a maximum security prison. New York: Princeton Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  31. Torpey, J., & Joppke, C. (2013). Legal integration of Islam: A transatlantic comparison. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Internet Resources

  1. Caritas Germany. (2014). Caritas as employer. http://www.caritas.de/fuerprofis/arbeitenbeidercaritas/arbeitgebercaritas/caritasalsarbeitgeber.aspx. Accessed 22 Feb 2014.
  2. Christliches Missionswerk Josua. (2014). About us. http://www.missionswerkjosua.de/ueber-uns. Accessed 29 Sep 2014.
  3. German press agency. (2014). Quarrel in Islam forum. http://www.berlin.de/aktuelles/berlin/3251308-958092-krach-um-muslimische-seelsorge-islamforu.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
  4. Justizministerium Niedersachsen. (2012): Justice Minister Busemann signed agreement between the Muslim associations and the Ministry of Justice. http://www.mj.niedersachsen.de/portal/live.php?navigation_id=3745&article_id=111512&_psmand=1. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
  5. MUSE Wiesbaden. (2014). About us. http://muse-wiesbaden.de/. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
  6. Schnell, L. (2014). From prison to jihad: Islamists seek supporters among German inmates. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/islamists-seek-support-in-german-prisons-a-978720.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
  7. Stadtstaat Hamburg. (2014): Contract Hamburg. http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/3551370/data/download-muslim-verbaende.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2014.
  8. White House Office and Faith-Based and Community Organizations. (2014) The initiative from the president, available via http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/president-initiative.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2014.

Legal Texts

  1. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany in the revised version published in the Federal Law Gazette Part III, classification number 100–1, as last amended by the Act of 21 July 2010 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 944).Google Scholar
  2. Act concerning the execution of prison sentences and measures of rehabilitation and prevention involving deprivation of liberty (Federal Law Gazette I p. 2425; the translation includes the amendment(s) to the Act by Article 4 of the Act of 5.12.2012).Google Scholar

Translation

  1. Original German quotes and transcriptions are the author’s literal translations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Religious Studies—CERESRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations