Financial Derivatives on Transmission Capacity

  • Petri Mäntysaari
Chapter

Abstract

The choice of products for hedging transmission risk depends on how transmission capacity is allocated.

Keywords

Market Power Market Participant Network Code Electricity Producer Price Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bartholomew ES, Siddiqui AS, Marnay C, Oren SS (2003) The New York transmission congestion contract market: is it truly working efficiently? Electr J 16(9):14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tej.2003.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deng SJ, Oren SS (2006) Electricity derivatives and risk management. Energy 31(6–7):940–953. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duthaler C, Finger M (2008) Financial transmission rights in Europe’s electricity market. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Delft University of Technology, Discussion paper series on the coherence between institutions and technologies in infrastructures, WP0803. http://mir.epfl.ch/webdav/site/mir/users/181931/public/wp0803.pdf
  4. EFET (2006) More transmission capacity for European cross border electricity transactions without building new infrastructure: Improving firmness of capacity rights and maximizing capacity allocation using new Regulatory incentives for transmission system operators. MayGoogle Scholar
  5. EFET (2007) Key principles in the treatment of electricity transmission capacity rights and their linkage to day ahead allocation mechanisms. JuneGoogle Scholar
  6. ENTSO-E (2012) Transmission risk hedging products – an ENTSO-E educational paper. Updated Version, 20 JuneGoogle Scholar
  7. ENTSO-E Network Code on Forward Capacity Allocation (2 April 2014)Google Scholar
  8. Green R (2003) Cost recovery and the efficient development of the grid. In: Lévêque F (ed) Transport pricing of electricity networks. Kluwer, Boston, pp 137–153. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3756-1_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hogan WW (1999) A concurrent auction model for transmission congestion contracts. In: Weyant J (ed) Energy and environmental policy modeling. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 18. Kluwer, Boston
  10. Joskow PL, Tirole J (1999a) Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks I: financial rights. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 2093Google Scholar
  11. Joskow PL, Tirole J (1999b) Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks II: physical rights. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 2087Google Scholar
  12. Joskow PL, Tirole J (2000) Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks. RAND J Econ 31(3):450–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. NordREG (2010) The Nordic financial electricity market. Report 8/2010Google Scholar
  14. US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (2010) Financial Derivatives on Energy Markets. Senate Hearing 111-752. The U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petri Mäntysaari
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Accounting and Commercial LawHanken School of EconomicsVaasaFinland

Personalised recommendations