DrawCompileEvolve: Sparking Interactive Evolutionary Art with Human Creations

  • Jinhong Zhang
  • Rasmus Taarnby
  • Antonios Liapis
  • Sebastian Risi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9027)

Abstract

This paper presents DrawCompileEvolve, a web-based drawing tool which allows users to draw simple primitive shapes, group them together or define patterns in their groupings (e.g. symmetry, repetition). The user’s vector drawing is then compiled into an indirectly encoded genetic representation, which can be evolved interactively, allowing the user to change the image’s colors, patterns and ultimately transform it. The human artist has direct control while drawing the initial seed of an evolutionary run and indirect control while interactively evolving it, thus making DrawCompileEvolve a mixed-initiative art tool. Early results in this paper show the potential of DrawCompileEvolve to jump-start evolutionary art with meaningful drawings as well as the power of the underlying genetic representation to transform the user’s initial drawing into a different, yet potentially meaningful, artistic rendering.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the users of DrawCompileEvolve for their contributions. The research was supported, in part, by the FP7 ICT project C2Learn (project no: 318480) and by the FP7 Marie Curie CIG project AutoGameDesign (project no: 630665).

References

  1. 1.
    Secretan, J., Beato, N., D’Ambrosio, D.B., Rodriguez, A., Campbell, A., Folsom-Kovarik, J.T., Stanley, K.O.: Picbreeder: a case study in collaborative evolutionary exploration of design space. Evol. Comput. 19, 373–403 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clune, J., Lipson, H.: Evolving three-dimensional objects with a generative encoding inspired by developmental biology. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Risi, S., Lehman, J., D’Ambrosio, D., Hall, R., Stanley, K.O.: Introducing a marketplace for evolved content in the petalz social video game. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G.N., Togelius, J.: Adapting models of visual aesthetics for personalized content creation. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 4(3), 213–228 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hastings, E., Guha, R., Stanley, K.O.: NEAT particles: design, representation, and animation of particle system effects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoover, A., Szerlip, P., Stanley, K.O.: Generating musical accompaniment through functional scaffolding. In: Proccedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoover, A., Rosario, M.P., Stanley, K.O.: Scaffolding for interactively evolving novel drum tracks for existing songs. In: Proceedings of the European Workshop on Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and Design (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takagi, H.: Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proc. IEEE 89(9), 1275–1296 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stanley, K.O.: Compositional pattern producing networks: a novel abstraction of development. Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach. 8(2), 131–162 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanley, K.O., Miikkulainen, R.: Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evol. Comput. 10(2), 99–127 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liapis, A., Martínez, H.P., Togelius, J., Yannakakis, G.N.: Adaptive game level creation through rank-based interactive evolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clune, J., Chen, A., Lipson, H.: Upload any object and evolve it: injecting complex geometric patterns into CPPNs for further evolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liapis, A., Yannakakis, G.N., Togelius, J.: Sentient world: human-based procedural cartography. In: Machado, P., McDermott, J., Carballal, A. (eds.) EvoMUSART 2013. LNCS, vol. 7834, pp. 180–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Risi, S.: A compiler for CPPNs: transforming phenotypic descriptions into genotypic representations. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium Series (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yannakakis, G.N., Liapis, A., Alexopoulos, C.: Mixed-initiative co-creativity. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Risi, S., Zhang, J., Taarnby, R., Greve, P., Piskur, J., Liapis, A., Togelius, J.: The case for a mixed-initiative collaborative neuroevolution approach. In: Proceedings of the ALIFE Workshop on Artificial Life and the Web (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinhong Zhang
    • 1
  • Rasmus Taarnby
    • 1
  • Antonios Liapis
    • 2
  • Sebastian Risi
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Computer Games ResearchIT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Digital GamesUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations