An Ontology for Dynamic Sensor Selection in Wearable Activity Recognition

  • Claudia Villalonga
  • Oresti Banos
  • Hector Pomares
  • Ignacio Rojas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9044)


A strong effort has been made during the last years in the autonomous and automatic recognition of human activities by using wearable sensor systems. However, the vast majority of proposed solutions are designed for ideal scenarios, where the sensors are pre-defined, well-known and steady. Such systems are of little application in real-world settings, in which the sensors are subject to changes that may lead to a partial or total malfunctioning of the recognition system. This work presents an innovative use of ontologies in activity recognition to support the intelligent and dynamic selection of the best replacement for a given shifted or anomalous wearable sensor. Concretely, an upper ontology describing wearable sensors and their main properties, such as measured magnitude, location and internal characteristics is presented. Moreover, a domain ontology particularly defined to neatly and unequivocally represent the exact placement of the sensor on the human body is presented. These ontological models are particularly aimed at making possible the use of standard wearable activity recognition in data-driven approaches.


Ontologies Activity Recognition Wearable sensors Sensor selection Sensor placement Human anatomy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Foundational Model of Anatomy ontology (FMA),
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Uber anatomy ontology (Uberon),
  4. 4.
    Bae, I.-H.: An ontology-based approach to adl recognition in smart homes. Future Generation Computer Systems 33, 32–41 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    BakhshandehAbkenar, A., Loke, S.W.: Myactivity: Cloud-hosted continuous activity recognition using ontology-based stream reasoning. In: 2014 2nd IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering, pp. 117–126 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banos, O., Damas, M., Guillen, A., Herrera, L.-J., Pomares, H., Rojas, I., Villalonga, C.: Multi-sensor fusion based on asymmetric decision weighting for robust activity recognition. Neural Processing Letters, 1–22 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Banos, O., Damas, M., Pomares, H., Prieto, A., Rojas, I.: Daily living activity recognition based on statistical feature quality group selection. Expert Systems with Applications 39(9), 8013–8021 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banos, O., Toth, M.A., Damas, M., Pomares, H., Rojas, I.: Dealing with the effects of sensor displacement in wearable activity recognition. Sensors 14(6), 9995–10023 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banos, O., Villalonga, C., Damas, M., Gloesekoetter, P., Pomares, H., Rojas, I.: Physiodroid: Combining wearable health sensors and mobile devices for a ubiquitous, continuous, and personal monitoring. The Scientific World Journal 2014(490824), 1–11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Okeyo, G.: An ontology-based hybrid approach to activity modeling for smart homes. IEEE T. Human-Machine Systems 44(1), 92–105 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mannini, A., Intille, S.S., Rosenberger, M., Sabatini, A.M., Haskell, W.: Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 45(11), 2193–2203 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mungall, C., Torniai, C., Gkoutos, G., Lewis, S., Haendel, M.: Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology. Genome Biology 13(1), R5 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen, T.A., Raspitzu, A., Aiello, M.: Ontology-based office activity recognition with applications for energy savings. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 5(5), 667–681 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oresko, J.J., Jin, Z., Cheng, J., Huang, S., Sun, Y., Duschl, H., Cheng, A.C.: A wearable smartphone-based platform for real-time cardiovascular disease detection via electrocardiogram processing. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14(3), 734–740 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patel, S., Mancinelli, C., Healey, J., Moy, M., Bonato, P.: Using wearable sensors to monitor physical activities of patients with copd: A comparison of classifier performance. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 234–239 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Riboni, D., Bettini, C.: Cosar: Hybrid reasoning for context-aware activity recognition. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 15(3), 271–289 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riboni, D., Bettini, C.: Owl 2 modeling and reasoning with complex human activities. Pervasive Mobile Computing 7(3), 379–395 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Villalonga
    • 1
  • Oresti Banos
    • 2
  • Hector Pomares
    • 1
  • Ignacio Rojas
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center for Information and Communications TechnologiesUniversity of Granada (CITIC-UGR)GranadaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringKyung Hee UniversityKorea

Personalised recommendations