Global Sustainability pp 51-61 | Cite as
Narratives for a Sustainable Future: Vision and Motivation for Collective Action
- 1.1k Downloads
Abstract
The scope, urgency, and magnitude of the highly complex and interrelated challenges of global climate, ecological, economic, and social change are the most critical issues currently facing humanity. We are living in the midst of rapid and accelerating change in physical, biological, and societal conditions on multiple spatial and temporal levels (see, e.g., ICSU (2010) Earth System Science for Global Sustainability and Future Earth 2025 Vision). In this article, we will consider what role narratives – especially in the sense of affective communication – can and do play in motivating transformative steps toward sustainability, why substantive collaborations between those engaged in science, art, technology, and humanities are needed to create new visions for and reflections on sustainability, and how the impacts and outcomes of different forms of narrative expression can be assessed to improve our understanding of how knowledge, learning, and societal change are linked (Blackmore et al. 2011).
Keywords
Stakeholder engagement Narratives Sustainability Transformation Beliefs ValuesNotes
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Professor Benno Werlen for the opportunity to engage in a stimulating workshop on transdisciplinary intercultural ecological research for sustainability (TIERS) in Jena, Germany in June 2012, which contributed to the ideas discussed in this article. I am also very grateful for conversations with Dr. David Tàbara, who enriched my thoughts on narratives.
References
- Blackmore, C., Chabay, I., Collins, K., Gutscher, H., Lotz-Sisitka, H., McCauley, S., Niles, D., Pfeiffer, E., et al. (2011). Knowledge, Learning and Societal Change (KLSC) – Finding paths to a sustainable future. Science plan for International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP). Research alliance. http://www.proclim.ch/4dcgi/klsc/en/News?2070. Accessed 8 Nov 2012.
- Chavalarias, D., Coinet J.-P., Cornilleau, L., Duong T. K., Mogoutov, A., Roth, C., et al. (2011). Stream of media issues: Approaches for monitoring world food security. http://pulseweb.cortext.net/static/files/wp1.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2012.
- Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) Newsletter, 41, 17–18.Google Scholar
- Grant, D. (2012). ‘Sustainability’ has become a growing focus of artists’ (and art schools’) attention. Huffington post blog. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-grant/sustainability-and-art-schools_b_1417562.html. Accessed 3 Dec 2012.
- Future Earth (2014) Future earth strategic research agenda 2014. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU). http://www.futureearth.org/sites/default/files/strategic_research_agenda_2014.pdf
- ICSU. (2010). Earth system science for global sustainability: The grand challenges International Council for Science, Paris. http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/grand-challenges/GrandChallenges_Oct2010.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
- Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 37.Google Scholar
- Liu, J., Mooney, H., Hull, V., Davis, S. J., Gaskell, J., Hertel, T., Lubchenco, J., Seto, K.C., Gleick, P., Kremen, C., & Li, S. (2015). Systems integration for global sustainability. Science, 347, 1258832. doi: 10.1126/science.1258832.
- Morgan, M. M., & Morrison, M. (1999). Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman, A. (2012). Kansas lawmakers seek resolution against “Insidious” UN Agenda 21. The New American. Blog. www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/11318-kansas-lawmakers-seek-resolution-against-%E2%80%9Cinsidious%E2%80%9D-un-agenda-21. Accessed 10 Jan 2013.
- Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
- Pidgeon, N., & Fischoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rewerts, A. L., & Hanf, J. H. (2006). Culture and values – their relevance for marketing strategies. European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar. http://purl.umn.edu/10113. Accessed 12 Feb 2012.
- Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 1–33.Google Scholar
- Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S. N., & Noone, K. (1998). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change. Physics Today, 51(10), 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H., & Earle, T. C. (2005). Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tàbara, J. D., & Chabay, I. (2012). Coupling human information and knowledge systems with social–ecological systems change: Reframing research, education, and policy for sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy, 28, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 445–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2001). Public participation in watershed management planning: Views on process from people in the field. Human Ecology Review, 8(2), 29–39.Google Scholar
- Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yariv, L. (2002). I’ll see it when i believe it – A simple model of cognitive consistency (Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper Number 1352).Google Scholar