Advertisement

Laparoscopic Procedures: Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection

  • Jake D. Foster
  • Nader K. Francis
Chapter

Abstract

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) of the rectum remains the standard treatment for a substantial proportion of patients with tumors of the lower third of the rectum. This procedure is ideally suited to the laparoscopic approach, with the specimen evacuated through the perineum avoiding the need for a large abdominal retrieval wound. There is evidence to indicate that laparoscopic APR may enable a reduction in resection margin involvement compared with open surgery. Mobilization of the rectum is performed using the same laparoscopic method as laparoscopic total mesorectal excision; however, the mesorectal dissection is stopped at the level of the origins of the levator ani muscles. Following this a colostomy is created and the perineal dissection performed with wide division of the levator muscles at their origins (Extra-Levator APR). The specimen is then evacuated through the perineum. Reconstruction of the perineum fills the tissue defect left at the level of the levators and can reduce complications such as perineal hernia and wound dehiscence. Options for reconstruction include tissue flaps and biologic mesh. Multidisciplinary team management within an enhanced recovery program should be the standard for perioperative care, with early mobilization and minimization of the stress response to surgery optimizing the benefits offered by laparoscopy.

Keywords

Rectal cancer Laparoscopy Abdominoperineal resection Abdominoperineal excision ELAPE ELAPR 

Supplementary material

(MPG 378386 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet. 1908;2:1812–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heald RJ, Smedh RK, Kald A, Sexton R, Moran BJ. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum—an endangered operation. Norman Nigro Lectureship. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:747–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2005;242:74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mehta S. Inadvertent perforation during rectal cancer resection in Norway (Br J Surg 2004;91:210–216). Br J Surg. 2004;91(6):779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:232–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H. Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer—a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:1227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:144–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Köckerling F, Gastinger I, Schneider B, Krause W, Gall FP. Laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection of the rectum with high intersection of the inferior mesenteric artery. Chirurg. 1992;63:345–8 (German).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sackier JM, Berci G, Hiatt JR, Hartunian S. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1207–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa Jr AH, de Campos FG, Habr-Gama A, Dumarco RB, Caravatto PP, Nahas SC, da Silva J, Kiss DR, Gama-Rodrigues JJ. Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003;58:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Teoh AY, Leung WW. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2418–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:210–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:637–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleshman J. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)-Z6051. A phase III prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted resection versus open resection for rectal cancer. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00726622. Accessed 17 Apr 2014.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jefferies MT, Evans MD, Hilton J, Chandrasekaran T, Beynon J, Khot U. Oncological outcome after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:967–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kipling SL, Young K, Foster JD, Smart NJ, Hunter AE, Cooper E, Francis NK. Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: short-term outcomes of a prospective case series. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:445–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaughan-Shaw PG, King AT, Cheung T, et al. Early experience with laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision within an enhanced recovery setting: analysis of short term outcomes and quality of life. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:451–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M, Parvaiz A, Acheson AG, Jenkins JT, Griffith J, Coleman MG, Hanna GB. Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2704–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wong DC, Chung CC, Chan ES, Kwok AS, Tsang WW, Li MK. Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection revisited: are there any health-related benefits? A comparative study. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, Fry C, Rockall TA. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1068–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heald RJ. The ‘Holy Plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81:503–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keller DS, Lawrence JK, Delaney CP. Prone jackknife position is not necessary to achieve a cylindrical abdominoperineal resection: demonstration of the lithotomy position. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA. Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:438–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anderin C, Martling A, Lagergren J, Ljung A, Holm T. Short-term outcome after gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1060–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chan S, Miller M, Ng R, Ross D, Roblin P, Carapeti E, Williams AB, George ML. Use of myocutaneous flaps for perineal closure following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for adenocarcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McMenamin DM, Clements D, Edwards TJ, Fitton AR, Douie WJP. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for perineal reconstruction: modifications to the technique based on a large single-centre experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:375–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christensen H, Nerstrøm P, Tei T, Laurberg S. Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:711–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Xu HM, Yang ZH, Jin ML. Pelvic floor reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix after cylindrical abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wille-Jørgensen P, Pilsgaard B, Møller P. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:323–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, Branagan G, Longman RJ, Thomas MG, Francis N. Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1052–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Putter H, Rutten HJ, Beets GL, Wiggers T, Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the Total Mesorectal Excision trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vaughan-Shaw PG, Cheung T, Knight JS, Nichols PH, Pilkington SA, Mirnezami AH. A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:355–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryYeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation TrustSomersetUK

Personalised recommendations