Advertisement

Transanal Approaches: Transanal Endoscopic Surgery

  • Traci L. Hedrick
  • Joshua Bleier
Chapter

Abstract

To a large degree, the development of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was catalyzed by the revolution started by the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. TEM was developed by Professor Gerhard Buess in Tubingen, Germany, as a response to limitations in the ability of transanal surgery to manage proximal rectal lesions. Professor Buess developed a tool which provided substantial advantages to standard transanal excision. In 1983, following successful animal trials, Buess published a report using his innovative proctoscope to remove a rectal adenoma. The use of this technique subsequently expanded in the USA. The technology has evolved, now with the original design being augmented with a laparoscopic attachment for overhead viewing. In addition, several other innovative platforms for transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) have been developed. This chapter will serve to outline the technique, indications, outcomes, and pitfalls of the various TES techniques for the management of rectal surgery. Finally, we will discuss some newer innovative and thought-provoking uses of the TES platform.

Keywords

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery Transanal resection Transanal endoscopic surgery Rectal polyp Rectal adenoma Rectal cancer Rectal surgery Transanal total mesorectal excision 

Supplementary material

Video 2.1

(MP4 33394kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Buess G, et al. Transanal endoscopic surgery of the rectum—testing a new method in animal experiments. Leber Magen Darm. 1983;13(2):73–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buess G, et al. Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1992;163(1):63–9. discussion 69-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith LE, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Initial registry results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10 Suppl):S79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(9):2200–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moore JS, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(7):1026–30. discussion 1030-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Graaf EJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(7):762–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christoforidis D, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus conventional transanal excision for patients with early rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):776–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCloud JM, et al. Factors predicting early recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision for rectal adenoma. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8(7):581–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albert MR, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(3):301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bretagnol F, et al. Local excision of rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94(5):627–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buess G, et al. Endoscopic microsurgery of rectal tumors. Endoscopy. 1987;19 Suppl 1:38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiavellati L, et al. Management of large malignant rectal polyps with transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Is there anything better for the patient? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1994;20(6):658–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Graaf EJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(6):1107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Endreseth BH, et al. Postoperative morbidity and recurrence after local excision of rectal adenomas and rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(2):133–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ganai S, et al. Local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal polyps and early cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(4):547–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guerrieri M, et al. Treatment of rectal adenomas by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 15 years’ experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):445–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeong WK, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: experience at Korea’s National Cancer Center. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(11):2575–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramirez JM, et al. Local full-thickness excision as first line treatment for sessile rectal adenomas: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2009;249(2):225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Said S, Stippel D. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in large, sessile adenomas of the rectum. A 10-year experience. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(10):1106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steinhagen E, Chang G, Guillem JG. Initial experience with transanal endoscopic microsurgery: the need for understanding the limitations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(6):958–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsai BM, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection of rectal tumors: outcomes and recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(1):16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barendse RM, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of large rectal adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(4):e191–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    van den Broek FJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study). BMC Surg. 2009;9:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bridoux V, et al. Combined transanal and laparoscopic approach for the treatment of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):418–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Serra-Aracil X, et al. Atypical indications for transanal endoscopic microsurgery to avoid major surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(2):157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bremers AJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery approach for rectal stump resection as an alternative to transperitoneal stump resection. Br J Surg. 2013;100(4):568–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pigalarga R, Patel NM, Rezac C. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery-assisted rectal advancement flap is a viable option for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula repair: a case report. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(2):209–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    You YN, et al. Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):726–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peeters KC, et al. The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chuwa EW, Seow-Choen F. Outcomes for abdominoperineal resections are not worse than those of anterior resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(1):41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ricciardi R, et al. The status of radical proctectomy and sphincter-sparing surgery in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(8):1119–27. discussion 1126–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cataldo PA, O’Brien S, Osler T. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a prospective evaluation of functional results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(7):1366–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Greenberg JA, et al. Local excision of distal rectal cancer: an update of cancer and leukemia group B 8984. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(8):1185–91. discussion 1191–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, et al. Local excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3):345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Paty PB, et al. Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):522–9. discussion 529–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nash GM, et al. Long-term survival after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):577–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gleeson FC, et al. Local recurrence detection following transanal excision facilitated by EUS-FNA. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59(116):1102–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    De Graaf EJ, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(12):1280–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, et al. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2N0 rectal cancer: preliminary results of the ACOSOG Z6041 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):384–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro LA, Thomas CR, Chan E, Cataldo P, Jorge M, Medich D, Johnson C, Oommen S, Wolff B, Pigazzi A, McNevin M, Pons R, Bleday R. Recurrence and Survival in Patients with uT2uN0 Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Local Excision: Results of the ACPSPG Z6041 Trial (S27). American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Annual Meeting, Hollywood, FL, 2014.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lezoche G, et al. A prospective randomized study with a 5-year minimum follow-up evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(2):352–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bokkerink GM, et al. The CARTS study: chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the distal rectum followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery. BMC Surg. 2011;11:34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rothenberger DA, Garcia-Aguilar J. Role of local excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 2000;19(4):367–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salinas HM, et al. Determining the need for radical surgery in patients with T1 rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2011;146(5):540–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Landmann RG, et al. Limitations of early rectal cancer nodal staging may explain failure after local excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(10):1520–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Keane C, Young M. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. 2013. ANZ J Surg.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yimei J, et al. A comparison between the reference values of MRI and EUS and their usefulness to surgeons in rectal cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(15):2069–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Blumberg D, et al. All patients with small intramural rectal cancers are at risk for lymph node metastasis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(7):881–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nascimbeni R, et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(2):200–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mitrovic B, et al. Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma: time to take notice. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(10):1315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kye BH, et al. Tumor budding as a risk factor of lymph node metastasis in submucosal invasive T1 colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective study. BMC Surg. 2012;12:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ramirez JM, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Long-term oncologic results. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(4):437–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stipa F, Giaccaglia V, Burza A. Management and outcome of local recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(3):262–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Weiser MR, et al. Surgical salvage of recurrent rectal cancer after transanal excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(6):1169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Guerrieri M, et al. Sphincter-saving surgery in patients with rectal cancer treated by radiotherapy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery: 10 years’ experience. Dig Liver Dis. 2003;35(12):876–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Perez RO, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for residual rectal cancer (ypT0-2) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: another word of caution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(1):6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kinoshita T, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal carcinoid tumor. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(6):970–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lezoche G, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for 135 patients with small nonadvanced low rectal cancer (iT1-iT2, iN0): short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1222–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Allaix ME, et al. Long-term functional results and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98(11):1635–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bignell MB, et al. Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS): a prospective audit. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(7):99–103.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Barker JA, Hill J. Incidence, treatment and outcome of rectal stenosis following transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(3):281–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chandra A, Clarke R, Shawkat H. Intraoperative hypercarbia and massive surgical emphysema secondary to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS). BMJ Case Rep. 2014. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hompes R, et al. Completion surgery following transanal endoscopic microsurgery: assessment of quality and short- and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):e576–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Levic K, et al. The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage TME following TEM compared with primary TME: a case-matched study. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(4):397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    van Gijn W, et al. Unexpected rectal cancer after TEM: outcome of completion surgery compared with primary TME. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(11):1225–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Speake D, et al. Who should be followed up after transanal endoscopic resection of rectal tumours? Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(4):330–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Murray SE, et al. Surveillance of small rectal carcinoid tumors in the absence of metastatic disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(11):3486–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lacy AM, Adelsdorfer C. Totally transrectal endoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME). Colorectal Dis. 2011;13 Suppl 7:43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sylla P, et al. A pilot study of natural orifice transanal endoscopic total mesorectal excision with laparoscopic assistance for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Atallah S, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): a stepwise description of the surgical technique with video demonstration. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(3):321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    de Lacy AM, et al. Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Winde G, et al. Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(9):969–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Allaix ME, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms: experience of 300 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(11):1831–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Palma P, et al. Local excision of early rectal cancer: is transanal endoscopic microsurgery an alternative to radical surgery? Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101(3):172–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Doornebosch PG, et al. Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(9):1234–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2018

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Perelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations