Looking for Books in Social Media: An Analysis of Complex Search Requests

  • Marijn Koolen
  • Toine Bogers
  • Antal van den Bosch
  • Jaap Kamps
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9022)

Abstract

Real-world information needs are generally complex, yet almost all research focuses on either relatively simple search based on queries or recommendation based on profiles. It is difficult to gain insight into complex information needs from observational studies with existing systems; potentially complex needs are obscured by the systems’ limitations. In this paper we study explicit information requests in social media, focusing on the rich area of social book search. We analyse a large set of annotated book requests from the LibraryThing discussion forums. We investigate 1) the comprehensiveness of book requests on the forums, 2) what relevance aspects are expressed in real-world book search requests, and 3) how different types of search topics are related to types of users, human recommendations, and results returned by retrieval and recommender systems. We find that book search requests combine search and recommendation aspects in intricate ways that require more than only traditional search or (hybrid) recommendation approaches.

Keywords

Book Search Social Media Evaluation Recommendation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anand, S.S., Mobasher, B.: Contextual recommendation. In: Berendt, B., Hotho, A., Mladenic, D., Semeraro, G. (eds.) WebMine 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4737, pp. 142–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beckers, T., Fuhr, N., Pharo, N., Nordlie, R., Fachry, K.N.: Overview and results of the INEX 2009 interactive track. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds.) ECDL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6273, pp. 409–412. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhatia, S., Mitra, P.: Adopting Inference Networks for Online Thread Retrieval. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2010. AAAI Press (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borlund, P.: The Concept of Relevance in IR. JASIST 54(10), 913–925 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchanan, G., McKay, D.: The bookshop: examining popular search strategies. In: Proceedings of JCDL 2011, pp. 269–278. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandler, O.: How Consumers Discover Books Online. Tools of Change for Publishing, O’Reilly (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cosijn, E., Ingwersen, P.: Dimensions of Relevance. Information Processing & Management 36, 533–550 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cunningham, S.J., Vanderschantz, N., Timpany, C., Hinze, A., Buchanan, G.: Social information behaviour in bookshops: Implications for digital libraries. In: Aalberg, T., Papatheodorou, C., Dobreva, M., Tsakonas, G., Farrugia, C.J. (eds.) TPDL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8092, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dean-Hall, A., Clarke, C.L.A., Kamps, J., Thomas, P., Simon, N., Voorhees, E.: Overview of the TREC 2013 contextual suggestion track. In: Proceedings of TREC 2013. NIST (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elsas, J.L., Carbonell, J.G.: It Pays to be Picky: An Evaluation of Thread Retrieval in Online Forums. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2009, pp. 714–715. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Indri. Language modeling meets inference networks (2014), http://sourceforge.net/projects/lemur/
  12. 12.
    Koolen, M., Kazai, G., Kamps, J., Preminger, M., Doucet, A., Landoni, M.: Overview of the INEX 2012 Social Book Search Track. In: Proceedings of INEX 2012. LNCS, Springer,Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koolen, M., Kamps, J., Kazai, G.: Social Book Search: Comparing Topical Relevance Judgements and Book Suggestions for Evaluation. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2012, pp. 185–194. ACM (2012a)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koolen, M., Kazai, G., Kamps, J., Doucet, A., Landoni, M.: Overview of the INEX 2011 books and social search track. In: Geva, S., Kamps, J., Schenkel, R. (eds.) INEX 2011. LNCS, vol. 7424, pp. 1–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koolen, M., Kazai, G., Preminger, M., Doucet, A.: Overview of the INEX 2013 social book search track. In: Proceedings of the CLEF 2013 Evaluation Labs and Workshop (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linden, G.: Geeking with Greg: Early Amazon: Similarities (2006), http://glinden.blogspot.nl/2006/03/early-amazon-similarities.html
  17. 17.
    : Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, pp. 45–50. ELRA (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reuter, K.: Assessing aesthetic relevance: Children’s book selection in a digital library. JASIST 58(12), 1745–1763 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ross, C.S.: Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing & Management 35(6), 783–799 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saracevic, T.: Relevance Reconsidered. In: Proceedings of COLIS 2, pp. 201–218 (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saracevic, T., Kantor, P.B.: A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. I, II, III. JASIS 39(3), 161–216 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marijn Koolen
    • 1
  • Toine Bogers
    • 2
  • Antal van den Bosch
    • 3
  • Jaap Kamps
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Aalborg University CopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Radboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations