Injuries of the Flexor Tendons

Abstract

A huge progress has been made these last years in the surgical treatment and rehabilitation of the flexor system. However, a good knowledge of the tendon healing process and some experience are required to limit the risks of tears or secondary adherences.

As always in hand surgery, but even more in tendon surgery, the gesture must be precise and meticulous to avoid tissue trauma, which leads to oedema and adherences, as much as possible.

The goal of this repair is to obtain a strong primary suture, allowing an immediate controlled rehabilitation, which is the only thing that can guarantee a good functional result.

Rehabilitation has to limit the risks of adherences and avoid any rupture of the suture in priority. A badly measured rehabilitation will lead to one of these two complications. There is a wide variety of rehabilitation protocols, depending on the physiotherapy centre. It also depends on the suture (type of suture, number of strands, etc.).

However, the immediate postoperative care and active exercises seem to be used in every centre, as they increase the intrinsic healing of the tendon. These early mobilizations create a healing remodelling, with a longitudinal orientation of the collagen fibres and a faster maturation of the tendinous callus. The mobilized tendons are therefore stronger and more mobile than the ones that are immobilized.

Keywords

Flexor Tendon Interphalangeal Joint Metacarpophalangeal Joint Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Outer Race 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Doyle JR (1988) Anatomy of the finger flexor tendon sheath and pulley system. J Hand Surg Am 13:473–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weber ER (1986) La repartition des tendons fléchisseurs dans le canal digital: rôle nutritionnel du liquide synovial. In: Traité de chirurgie de la main, vol 3. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delaquaize F (2003) Tendons fléchisseurs en zone II réparation et rééducation, méthodes actuelles et évolution des idées. Mémoire DIU de rééducation et appareillage en chirurgie de la mainGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ovieve JM, Chapin-Bouscarat B (2005) Lésions des tendons fléchisseurs en zone 2. Evolution des idées et rééducation. KS 2005Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Le Lardic C. Rééducation après suture des fléchisseurs des doigts, 40 ans d’évolution. KS octobre 2008Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Creekmore H, Bellingnausen H, Young VL, Wray R, Weeks PM, Grasse PS (1985) Comparison of early passive motion and immobilisation after flexor tendon repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:75–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isel M, Merle M (2012) Orthèses de la main et du poignet – protocoles de rééducation. Elsevier Masson, Issy-les-MoulineauGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Sud Aquitain de la Main et du Membre SupeérieurAguiléra Clinic BiarritzBiarritzFrance

Personalised recommendations