Advertisement

Socially-Aware Management of New Overlay Applications Traffic - The Optimization Potentials of the SmartenIT Approach

  • Krzysztof WajdaEmail author
  • Rafał Stankiewicz
  • Zbigniew Duliński
  • Tobias Hoßfeld
  • Michael Seufert
  • David Hausheer
  • Matthias Wichtlhuber
  • Ioanna Papafili
  • Manos Dramitinos
  • Paolo Cruschelli
  • Sergios Soursos
  • Roman Łapacz
  • Burkhard Stiller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 141)

Abstract

Today’s overlay-based mobile cloud applications determine a challenge to operators and cloud providers in terms of increasing traffic demands and energy costs. The social-aware management of overlay traffic is a promising optimization approach, which shows potential for improvements by exploiting social information. This paper identifies key stakeholders and their roles in the service provisioning value chain and outlines major markets and optimization potentials. Accordingly, two scenarios are developed: the end user focused scenario aming at increased QoE for end users, and the operator focused scenario targeting at the highest operating efficiency in terms of low cost and high revenue for the operator. The energy efficiency plays a major role as a key performance metric in both scenarios. SmartenIT’s socially-aware management approach is illustrated based on two example mechanisms for traffic optimization: the home router sharing mechanism (HORST) on the end user side, as well as the dynamic traffic management mechanism (DTM) on the operator side. The paper is concluded by a first sketch of SmartenIT’s architecture and its mapping to the two scenarios.

Keywords

Application-layer traffic optimization Economic traffic management Social networks QoE Energy efficiency Inter-cloud communications 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been performed in the framework of the EU ICT STREP SmartenIT (FP7-ICT-2011-317846). The authors would like to thank the entire SmartenIT team for discussions and providing insights on major research problems.

References

  1. 1.
    Seufert, M., Burger, V., Hoßfeld, T.: HORST - home router sharing based on trust. In: Social-aware Economic Traffic Management for Overlay and Cloud Applications Workshop (SETM 2013), in conjunction with 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), Zurich, Switzerland, October 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cisco Systems White Paper: Cisco Global Cloud Index: Forecast and Methodology 2011–2016 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mell, P., Grance, T.: SP 800–145. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, National Institute of Standards & Technology (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wichtlhuber, M., Heise, P., Scheurich, B.: Hausheer, D: Reciprocity with virtual nodes: Supporting mobile peers in Peer-to-Peer content distribution. In: Social-aware Economic Traffic Management for Overlay and Cloud Applications Workshop (SETM 2013), in conjunction with 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 406–409, October 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duliński, Z., Stankiewicz, R.: Dynamic traffic management mechanism for active optimization of ISP costs. In: Social-aware Economic Traffic Management for Overlay and Cloud Applications Workshop (SETM 2013), in conjunction with 9th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 398–401, October 2013Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Biancani, M., Cruschelli, P., (eds.): SmartenIT Deliverable 1.2 – Cloud Service Classifications and Scenarios, October 2013Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burger, V. (ed.): SmartenIT Deliverable 2.2 – Definitions of Traffic Management Mechanisms and Initial Evaluation Results, October 2013Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hausheer, D., Rückert, J. (eds.): SmartenIT Deliverable 3.1 – Initial System Architecture, April 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lareida, A., Bocek, T., Waldburger, M., Stiller, B.: RB-tracker: A fully distributed, replicating, network-, and topology-aware P2P CDN. In: IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2013), Ghent, Belgium, pp. 1199–1202, May 2013Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwartz, C., Hoßfeld, T., Lehrieder, F., Tran-Gia, P.: Angry apps: the impact of network timer selection on power consumption, signalling load, and web QoE. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2013, Article ID. 176217, 13 pp. (2013). doi: 10.1155/2013/176217
  11. 11.
    Reichl, P.: From charging for quality of service to charging for quality of experience. Ann. Telecommun. 65(3–4), 189–199 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stiller, B., Hausheer, D., Hoßfeld, T.: Towards a socially-aware management of new overlay application traffic combined with energy efficiency in the internet (SmartenIT). In: Galis, A., Gavras, A. (eds.) FIA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7858, pp. 3–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoßfeld, T., Hausheer, D., Hecht, F., Lehrieder, F., Oechsner, S., Papafili, I., Racz, P., Soursos, S., Staehle, D., Stamoulis, G.D., Tran-Gia, P. Stiller, B., Hausheer, D.: An economic traffic management approach to enable the TripleWin for users, ISPs, and overlay providers. In: Tselentis, G., et al. (eds.) FIA Prague Book – Towards the Future Internet - A European Research Perspective, pp. 24–34. IOS Press Books (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fiedler, M., Hossfeld, T., Tran-Gia, P.: A generic quantitative relationship between quality of experience and quality of service. IEEE Netw. Spec. Issue Improving QoE Netw. Serv. 24(2), 36–41 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krzysztof Wajda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rafał Stankiewicz
    • 1
  • Zbigniew Duliński
    • 1
  • Tobias Hoßfeld
    • 2
  • Michael Seufert
    • 2
  • David Hausheer
    • 3
  • Matthias Wichtlhuber
    • 3
  • Ioanna Papafili
    • 4
  • Manos Dramitinos
    • 4
  • Paolo Cruschelli
    • 5
  • Sergios Soursos
    • 6
  • Roman Łapacz
    • 7
  • Burkhard Stiller
    • 8
  1. 1.AGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland
  2. 2.University of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  3. 3.TU DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  4. 4.Athens University of Economics and BusinessAthensGreece
  5. 5.InteroutePisaItaly
  6. 6.Intracom SA Telecom SolutionsAthensGreece
  7. 7.Poznan Supercomputing and Networking CenterPoznańPoland
  8. 8.University of ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations