Advertisement

A Semiotic Approach to Critical Reasoning

  • Janos J. Sarbo
  • Jessica H. Yang
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 449)

Abstract

Information can be interpreted as in-formation, which refers to the potential of the form for a mediation of meaning. In this paper we focus on reasoning information and consider the question how form involved in reasoning can be used for an analysis of accounting narratives in corporate disclosures. An evaluation of experimental results is included.

Keywords

Semiotic reasoning rhetoric argument accounting narratives 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith, M., Jones, M.: Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 27, 183–208 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Courtis, J.K.: An Investigation into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk-Return Relationships. Accounting and Business Research 16, 285–294 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tregidga, H., Milne, M., Kearins, K. (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39, 477–494 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aerts, W.: On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19, 337–353 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kothari, S.P., Xu, L., Short, J.E.: The Effect of Disclosures by Management, Analysts, and Business Press on Cost of Capital, Return Volatility, and Analyst Forecasts: A Study Using Content Analysis. Accounting Review 84, 1639–1670 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    García Osma, B., Guillamón-Saorín, E.: Corporate governance and impression management in annual results press releases. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36, 187–208 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith, J.E., Smith, N.P.: Readability: A Measure of the Performance of the Communication Function of Financial Reporting. Accounting Review 46, 552 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, M.J.: A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman’s Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company. Accounting and Business Research 18, 297–305 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loughran, T., McDonald, B.: Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures. Journal of Finance 69, 1643–1671 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sarbo, J.J., Farkas, J.I., Van Breemen, A.J.J.: Knowledge in Formation: A Computational Theory of Interpretation. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones, M., Shoemaker, P.: Accounting narratives a review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature 13, 142–184 (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarbo, J.J.: On Well-formedness in Requirement Elicitation Processes. In: Feng, X., Liu, K., Jiang, G. (eds.) Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Informatics and Semiotics in Organizations, Beijing, China, pp. 18–25 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, F.: The Information Content of Forward-Looking Statements in Corporate Filings-A Naive Bayesian Machine Learning Approach. Journal of Accounting Research 48, 1049–1102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peirce, C.S.: Collected papers by Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1931-1958)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janos J. Sarbo
    • 1
  • Jessica H. Yang
    • 2
  1. 1.ICISRadboud UniversityNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Henley Business SchoolReadingUK

Personalised recommendations