Employee Engagement Implementation Leading Towards Employee Creativity

  • Stavros Georgiades
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

There is little empirically grounded theoretical account of how employees think about the way management can operationalize their engagement by focusing on the development of meanings and action that can lead towards the necessary sensemaking and help achieve employee creativity as a result. Consequently, the purpose of this chapter is to eliminate this lacuna and thus contribute towards a richer theory on the process behind the implementation of employee engagement, highlighting the importance of several organizational arrangements that can help management achieve employee creativity.

Keywords

Stock Option Psychological Empowerment Employee Creativity Organizational Arrangement Participatory Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abdel-Halim, A. A. (1983). Effects of task and personality characteristics on subordinate responses to participative decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakely, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extra role performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. New York, NY: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. In J. Baum & J. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 13, pp. 17–72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Black, S., & Margulies, N. (1989). An ideological perspective on participation: A case for integration. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2, 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Clayton, J., & Gregory, W. J. (2000). Reflections on critical systems thinking and the management of change in rule-bound systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 140–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cobb, A. T., Folger, R., & Wooten, K. (1995). The role justice plays in organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 135–152.Google Scholar
  12. Conger, J. A. (1986). Empowering leadership. Working paper, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
  13. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.Google Scholar
  14. Delaney, J. T., & Sockell, D. (1990). Employee involvement programs, unionization and organizational flexibility. In Academy of management best paper proceedings (pp. 264–269).Google Scholar
  15. Dessler, G. (2013). Fundamentals of human resource management (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Detert, R. J., & Burris, R. E. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.Google Scholar
  18. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (2003). Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fiedler, F. E. (1972). The effects of leadership training and experience: A contingency model interpretation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foot, M., & Hook, C. (2011). Introducing human resource management (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creativity in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112–1134.Google Scholar
  22. George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gill, J. (1996). Communication - Is it really that simple? An analysis of a communication exercise in a case study. Personnel Review, 25, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1081–1111.Google Scholar
  26. Gomes-Mejia, L., Balkin, D., & Cardy, R. (2011). Managing human resources (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill, R. C., & Levenhagen, M. (1995). Metaphors and mental models: Sensemaking in innovative and entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Management, 21, 1057–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. House, R., Rousseau, D. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 71–114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  30. Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kerr, J. L. (2004). The limits of organizational democracy. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ketokivi, M., & Castaner, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrating device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 337–365.Google Scholar
  34. Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, K. L., Schmisseur, M. A., Stephens, K. K., & Weir, K. E. (2006). Advice on communicating during organizational change. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luscher, L., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 2, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Luscher, L., Lewis, M. W., & Ingram, A. (2006). The social construction of organizational change paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manville, B., & Ober, J. (2003). Beyond empowerment: Building a company of citizens. Harvard Business Review, 81, 48–53.Google Scholar
  40. Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., & Ruddy, T. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McHugh, M. (1997). The stress factor: Another item for the change management agenda? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan, D. E., & Zeffane, R. (2003). Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neubert, M. J., & Cady, S. H. (2001). Program commitment: A multi-study longitudinal field investigation of its impact and antecedents. Personnel Psychology, 54, 421–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nord, W. R., Rosenblatt, Z., & Rogers, K. (1993). Toward a political framework for flexible management of decline. Organization Science, 4, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ober, J. (2007). Natural capacities and democracy as a good-in-itself. Philosophical Studies, 132, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ober, J. (2008). The original meaning of democracy: Capacity to do things, not majority rule. Constellations, 15, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Payne, R. (1990). The effectiveness of research teams: A review. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 101–122). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Pedersen, D. M. (1997). Psychological functions of privacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rusaw, C. A. (2000). Uncovering training resistance- A critical theory perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwenk, C. (1985). The use of participant recollection in the modeling of organizational decision processes. Academy of Management Review, 10, 496–503.Google Scholar
  52. Schwochau, S., & Delaney, J. (1997). Employee participation and assessments of support for organizational policy changes. Journal of Labor Research, 18, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). Effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.Google Scholar
  54. Straus, G. (1977). Managerial practices. In J. R. Hackman & L. J. Suttle (Eds.), Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change (pp. 297–363). Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.Google Scholar
  55. Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effect of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tesluk, P. E., Vance, R. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Examining employee involvement in the context of participative work environments. Group and Organization Management, 24, 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tierney, P. (1999). Work relations as a precursor to a psychological climate for change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological views (pp. 43–75). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Volkema, R. J., Farquhar, K., & Bergmann, T. J. (1996). Third-party sensemaking in interpersonal conflicts at work: A theoretical framework. Human Relations, 49(1437), 1454.Google Scholar
  60. Vroom, V. H. (1973). A new look at managerial decision making. Organizational Dynamics, 1, 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yin, R. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Zhang, X., & Bartol, M. K. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stavros Georgiades
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economic Sciences and AdministrationFrederick UniversityLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations