Advertisement

Engineers Make Their Own Context: Vision-Making in the Profession

  • Matthew Wisnioski
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 21)

Abstract

Engineering is an inherently normative practice dependent on how engineers understand history. Social vision, however, when mentioned in an engineering context typically brings to mind extremist regimes such as Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia. But all engineers practice with assumptions about how their interventions in the material world will change society. The historian of American engineering Edwin Layton called this set of socio-political beliefs the ideology of engineering. Engineers’ beliefs, however, have not been uniform across time and geography. Engineers have worked in specific national, international, corporate, and government contexts that have influenced how they see society’s past, present, and future. This essay surveys the historical literature on engineers’ social thought and presents a detailed case study of conflicting worldviews in 1960s American engineering to explore how engineers have acted upon differing normative visions. I argue that studying how engineers contextualize their world – particularly during moments of historical crisis – provides a source of inspiration and classroom instruction for those concerned with contemporary engineering in a global world.

Keywords

Contextualization New engineer Ideology Normative vision Responsibility Technological change Globalization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the editors for suggesting that the chapter be updated for a new audience, Jongmin Lee for his assistance in revisions, and Gary Downey for the spirit of communitas.

References

  1. Alder, K. (1997). Engineering the revolution: Arms and enlightenment in France, 1763–1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (1971). Goals: Basis for action programs, ‘Making Technology a True Servant of Man’. Mechanical Engineering, 93(4), 16–19.Google Scholar
  3. Aquarius Project. (1971). Revolutionary engineering. Spark, 1(2), 12.Google Scholar
  4. ASEE Humanistic-Social Research Project. (1968). Liberal learning for the engineer. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  5. Augustine, D. L. (2007). Red prometheus: Engineering and dictatorship in East Germany, 1945–1990. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bailes, K. E. (1978). Technology and society under Lenin and Stalin: Origins of the Soviet technical intelligentsia, 1917–1941. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, J. M. (1972). Science is dead – long live technology! Journal of Engineering Education, 62, 892–895.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, S. H., Meganck, M., & Delahousse, B. (Eds.). (2007). Philosophy in engineering. Århus: Academica.Google Scholar
  9. Committee for Social Responsibility in Engineering. (1971). Spark 1, 1.Google Scholar
  10. De Simone, D. V. (1968). Education for innovation. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Engineers Without Borders USA. (2013). http://www.ewb-usa.org
  13. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (1972). Science and technology as ideology. In B. Barnes (Ed.), Sociology of science (pp. 353–375). Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Harvard University Program on Technology and Society. (1972). A final review, 1964–1972. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hecht, G. (1998). The radiance of France: Nuclear power and national identity after world war II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Herf, J. (1984). Reactionary modernism: Technology, culture, and politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Knepler, H. (1973). Engineering education and the humanities in America. Leonardo, 6(4), 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Layton, E. T. (1971). Revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American Engineering Profession. Cleveland: Press of Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
  22. Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marcuse, H. (1964). One dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  24. Marine, G. (1969). America the raped: The engineering mentality and the devastation of a continent. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. Marlowe, D. (1970). The new luddites. Mechanical Engineering, 92(3), 12–13.Google Scholar
  26. Marx, L. (1997). Technology: The emergence of a hazardous concept. Social Research, 64(3), 965–988.Google Scholar
  27. Meiksins, P., & Smith, C. (Eds.). (1996). Engineering labour: Technical workers in comparative perspective. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Mumford, L. (1967). The myth of the machine: Technics and human development. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  29. Mumford, L. (1970). The myth of the machine: The pentagon of power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  30. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  31. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Grand challenges of engineering. Available at http://www.engineeringchallenges.org
  32. National Science Foundation. (1968). Employment of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1950–1966 (No. 68–30). National Science Foundation in Cooperation with US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  33. Noble, D. F. (1977). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: Men, women and modern machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perrucci, R., & Gerstl, J. E. (1969). Profession without community: Engineers in American Society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  36. Ramo, S. (1969). Cure for chaos: Fresh solutions to social problems through the systems approach. New York: D. McKay Co.Google Scholar
  37. Ramo, S. (1970). Century of mismatch. New York: D. McKay Co.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenstein, A. B. (1968). A study of a profession and professional education: The final publication and recommendations of the UCLA educational development program (EDP 7–68). Los Angeles: School of Engineering and Applied Science University of California.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, C. E. (Ed.). (2007). Design for the other 90%. New York: Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum.Google Scholar
  40. Snow, C. P. (1954). The new men. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Wakeman, R. E. (1970). Letter to the editor. Mechanical Engineering, 92(11), 70.Google Scholar
  42. Waldman, T. (1971). Quest for commonwealth, an applied humanities course. In Applying humanities to engineering (pp. 1–11). Claremont: Harvey Mudd College.Google Scholar
  43. White, L. T. (1967). Engineers and the making of a new humanism. Journal of Engineering Education, 57, 375–376.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, R. H. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wisnioski, M. H. (2009a). Engineers make their own context: Vision-making in the profession. In S. H. Christensen, B. Delahousse, & M. Meganck (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 403–415). Århus: Academica.Google Scholar
  47. Wisnioski, M. H. (2009b). “Liberal education has failed”: Reading like an engineer in 1960s America. Technology and Culture, 50(4), 753–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wisnioski, M. H. (2012). Engineers for change: Competing visions of technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.STS Department 0247Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations