Measuring and Benchmarking Corporate Environmental Performance

  • Marie Pavláková Dočekalová
  • Alena Kocmanová
  • Jana Hornungová
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 448)


Corporate environmental performance is discussed in this paper. The aim of the paper is to propose a framework for an environmental performance benchmarking model. Corporate environmental performance is measured by key performance indicators (KPIs): Emissions of Greenhouse Gases, Water Consumption, Waste Production and Gross Value Added. Performance is benchmarked against the production frontier estimated by Data Envelopment Analysis. The environmental performance benchmarking model was created and tested on real corporate data. The model determines relative corporate environmental performance, identifies weaknesses in performance and quantifies performance gaps.


corporate environmental performance benchmarking data envelopment analysis 


  1. 1.
    Lankoski, L.: Environmental and Economic Performance. The Basic Links. In: Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M. (eds.) Managing Business Case for Sustainability, pp. 82–106. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO 14031:2013 Environmental management — Environmental performance evaluation — GuidelinesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A.: A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal 40, 534–559 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirchhoff, S.: Green business and blue angels: a model of voluntary overcompliance with asymmetric information. Environmental and Resource Economics 15, 403–420 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feddersen, T.J., Gilligan, T.W.: Saints and markets: activists and the supply of credence goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, 149–171 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisman, R., Heal, G., Nair, V.B.: A Model of Corporate Philanthropy. New York, Columbia University (2008),
  7. 7.
    Horváthová, E.: Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 70, 52–59 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rothenberg, S., Schenck, B., Maxwell, J.: Lessons from benchmarking environmental performance at automobile assembly plants. Benchmarking: An International Journal 12, 5–15 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matthews, D.H.: Environmental management systems for internal corporate environmental benchmarking. Benchmarking: An International Journal 10, 95–106 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 14001:2004 Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for useGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tokos, H., Pintarič, Z.N., Krajnc, D.: An integrated sustainability performance assessment and benchmarking of breweries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 14, 173–193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, P.: Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37 (1977)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meeusen, W., van den Broeck, J.: Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 8, 435–444 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu, J.: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: DEA with Spreadsheets. Springer, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Post, T., Spronk, J.: Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 115, 472–487 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kocmanová, A., Klímková, M., Karpíšek, Z.: The Construction of Environmental Indicators for Determination of Performance of ESG Indicators to Support Decision-Making of investors. Business: Theory and Practice 13, 333–342 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kocmanová, A., Němeček, P., Dočekalová, M.: Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Reporting. In: 7th International Scientific Conference, pp. 655–663. Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hřebíček, J., Piliar, F., Soukopová, J., Štencl, M., Trenz, O.: Corporate Key Performance Indicators for Environmental Management and Reporting. Acta Universitatis Agriculturaeet Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59, 99–108 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elkington, J.: Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century. New Society Publishers, Stoney Creek (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kocmanová, A., Dočekalová, M.: Construction of the economic indicators of performance in relation to environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) factors. Acta Universitatis Agriculturaeet Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 60, 141–149 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chvátalová, Z., Kocmanová, A., Dočekalová, M.: Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Measuring Corporate Performance. In: 9th IFIP WG 5.11 International Symposium on Environmental Software Systems, pp. 245–254. ISESS, Brno (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hřebíček, J.: Voluntary Reporting in the Czech Republic and Indicators of Sustainable Development. Linde, Praha, pp. 257–264 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hřebíček, J., Soukopová, J.: Voluntary Company Assessment Report on the Linkages between Environment, Economy and Society. Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, Praha (2011) (in Czech)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Pavláková Dočekalová
    • 1
  • Alena Kocmanová
    • 1
  • Jana Hornungová
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and ManagementUniversity of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations