An Integrated Workflow Architecture for Natural Hazards, Analytics and Decision Support

  • James Hilton
  • Claire Miller
  • Matt Bolger
  • Lachlan Hetherton
  • Mahesh Prakash
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 448)

Abstract

We present a modular workflow platform for the simulation and analysis of natural hazards. The system is based on the CSIRO Workspace architecture, allowing transparent data interoperability between input, simulation and analysis components. The system is currently in use for flooding and inundation modelling, as well as research into bushfire propagation. The modularity of the architecture allows tools from multiple development groups to be easily combined into complex workflows for any given scenario. Examples of platform usage are demonstrated for saline intrusion into an environmentally sensitive area and image analysis inputs into a fire propagation model.

Keywords

simulation workflow natural hazard 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    TavernaWorkflow Management System (2014), http://www.taverna.org.uk/
  3. 3.
    Project Trident: A scientific workflow workbench (2014), http://tridentworkflow.codeplex.com/
  4. 4.
    KNIME (2014), http://www.knime.org/
  5. 5.
    The Kepler project (2014), https://kepler-project.org/
  6. 6.
    Altintas, I., Berkley, C., Jaeger, E., Jones, M., Ludascher, B., Mock, S.: Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, pp. 423–424 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simulink simulation and model-based design (2014), http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink/
  8. 8.
    LabVIEW System Design Software (2014), http://www.ni.com/labview/
  9. 9.
    Kurganov, A., Petrova, G.: A Second-Order Well-Balanced Positivity Preserving Central-Upwind Scheme for the Saint-Venant System. Commun. Math. Sci. 5, 133–160 (2007)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilton, J.E., Miller, C., Sullivan, A., Rucinski, C.: Incorporation of variation into wildfire spread models using a level set approach. Environmental Modelling and Software (under review)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sethian, J.A.: Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts. Journal of Computational Physics 169, 503–555 (2001)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gould, J.S., McCaw, W.L., Cheney, N.P., Ellis, P.F., Knight, I.K., Sullivan, A.L.: Project Vesta – Fire in Dry Eucalypt Forest: Fuel Structure, Dynamics and Fire Behaviour, CSIRO Ensis and Department of Environment and Conservation: Canberra, ACT (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheney, N.P., Gould, J.S., Catchpole, W.R.: Prediction of fire spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 8, 1–13 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Hilton
    • 1
  • Claire Miller
    • 1
  • Matt Bolger
    • 1
  • Lachlan Hetherton
    • 1
  • Mahesh Prakash
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Digital Productivity FlagshipAustralia

Personalised recommendations