Exposure Modeling of Traffic and Wood Combustion Emissions in Northern Sweden

Application of the Airviro Air Quality Management System
  • Lars Gidhagen
  • Cecilia Bennet
  • David Segersson
  • Gunnar Omstedt
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 448)


Traffic and residential wood combustion (rwc) constitute the two dominating local sources to fine particulate matter PM2.5 concentration levels in Sweden. In order to meet the authorities’ requirements of air quality assessments, a national modelling system SIMAIR has been developed. The system is based on the commercial Airviro air quality management software, a three tier client/server/web system which includes modules for measurement data collection, emission databases and dispersion models with very high performance in terms of data access and model execution. The technical characteristics of Airviro databases and models have facilitated web based national air quality systems, of which some examples are given.

The present Airviro/SIMAIR application had the objective to assess the impact of rwc in three urbanized areas in northern Sweden. The Airviro Scenario module was used to determine exposure and health impact of the rwc contribution. The estimated mortality due to PM2.5 concentrations from residential wood combustion is about 4 persons/year, which corresponds to approximately 0.4% of the total number of deaths (excluding accidents). Cities which have well established district heating facilities have a lower rwc use and a very different exposure to locally generated PM2.5. Umeå, one of the three areas in the study, is such a city. A similar assessment with impact only from traffic emissions shows an increase of 4.4 deaths for the Umeå population, while the impact of wood combustion in the city contributes with 2.5 deaths per year. The advantages of using the Airviro software in combination with annually updated databases for input data on the national scale, are summarized. The approach facilitates for municipal end users and non-meteorological professionals like epidemiologists to perform by themselves advanced dispersion simulations and health impact assessments.


Airviro dispersion modelling residential wood combustion PM2.5 health 


  1. 1.
    Lim, S.S., et al.: A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990—2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet, 380, 9859, 2224-2260 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Health Effects Institute, Ambient air pollution among top global health risks in 2010 (2013),
  3. 3.
    WHO, Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP Project, Technical report, 280 p. (2013) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Genberg, et al.: Light-absorbing carbon in Europe – measurement and modelling, with a focus on residential wood combustion emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 8719–8738 (2013), doi:10.5194/acp-13-8719-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gidhagen, L., Johansson, H., Omstedt, G.: SIMAIR – Evaluation tool for meeting the EU directive on air pollution limits. Atmospheric Environment 43, 1029–1036 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Omstedt, G., Andersson, S., Gidhagen, L., Robertson, L.: New model tools for meeting the targets of the EU Air Quality Directive: description, validation and evaluation of local air quality improvement due to reduction of studded tyre use on Swedish roads. Int. J. Environment and Pollution 47(1/2/3/4), 79–96 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Gidhagen, L., Omstedt, G., Pershagen, G., Willers, S., Bellander, T.: High resolution modeling of residential outdoor particulate levels in Sweden. J. Expos. Sci. & Environ. Epidem., 1–9 (2013), doi:10.1038/jes.2012.122Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Willers, S., Eriksson, C., Gidhagen, L., Nilsson, M.E., Pershagen, G., Bellander, T.: Fine and coarse particulate air pollution in relation to respiratory health in Sweden. Eur. Resp. J. 42, 924–934 (2013), doi:10.1183/09031936.00088212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Denzer, R., Schlobinski, S., Gidhagen, L., Hell, T.: How to Build Integrated Climate Change Enabled EDSS. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Kubásek, M., Rizzoli, A.E. (eds.) ISESS 2013. IFIP AICT, vol. 413, pp. 464–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. EPA.Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP),
  12. 12.
    Jerrett, M., et al.: Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Mortality in Los Angeles. Epidemiology 16(6), 727–736 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forsberg, B., Hansson, H.C., Johansson, C., Areskoug, H., Persson, K., Järvholm, B.: Comparative health assessment of local and regional particulate air pollutants in Scandinavia. Ambio 34, 11–19 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brandt, J., Silver, J.D., Christensen, J.H., Andersen, M.S., Bonlokke, J.H., Sigsgaard, T., Geels, C., Gross, A., Hansen, A.B., Hansen, K.M., Hedegaard, G.B., Kaas, E., Frohn, L.M.: Contribution from ten major emission sectors in Europe and Denmark to the health-cost externalities of air pollution using the EVA model system – an integrated modelling approach. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7725–7746 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Gidhagen
    • 1
  • Cecilia Bennet
    • 1
  • David Segersson
    • 1
  • Gunnar Omstedt
    • 1
  1. 1.Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological InstituteNorrköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations