Enabling Co-Located Physical Social Play: A Framework for Design and Evaluation

Chapter

Abstract

During the last decade, we have witnessed an increased interest in social play in digital games. With this comes an urge to understand better how to design and evaluate for this new form of play. In this chapter, we encapsulate best practices for game design and evaluation, grounded in other game researchers’ work, as well as our own research and practice. We focus on a sub-area of social games that has experienced great growth and has attracted general interest in research and in practice. It is also the area that has driven our own research: co-located, physical, and social play that is technology supported. In this overview, we provide a sense of the challenges and opportunities involved when designing for this particular area, using good empirical grounding and presenting a framework in the form of lenses through which to think about the design of co-located physical social games.

References

  1. Andrew K, (2011) Rise of iOS and Android halves Nintendo DS game revenue in US in 2 years. Pocket Gamer website, http://www.pocketgamer.biz/r/PG.Biz/Flurry/feature.asp?c=35150. Accessed 29 March 2015
  2. Avedon E, (1971) The study of games, chapter. The structural elements of games. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura A, (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekker T, Sturm J, Eggen B (2010) Designing playful interactions for social interaction and physical play. Pers Ubiquit Comput 14(5):385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell C (2012) Designing for friendship: shaping player relationships with rules and freedom. GDC 2012 talk, accessible in GDC vault. http://gdcvault.com/play/1015706/Designing-for-Friendship-Shaping-Player. Accessed 29 March 2015
  6. Benford S, Achnädelbach H, Koleva B, Anastasi R, Greenhalgh C, Rodden T, Jonathan G, Ghali A, Pridmore T, Gaver B, Boucher A, Walker B, Pennington S, Schmidt A, Gellersen H (2005) Expected, sensed, and desired: a framework for designing sensing-based interaction. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12(1):3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi-Berthouze N, Kim WW, Patel D (2007) Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? and why? Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, ACII ’07. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 102–113Google Scholar
  8. Caillois R (2001) Man, play and games. University of Illinois Press, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr D, Sachott G, Burn A, Buckingham D (2004) Doing game studies: a multimethod approach to the study of textuality, interactivity, and narrative space. Media Int Aust Inc Culture Policy 110:12Google Scholar
  10. Costikyan (2002) I Have No Words & I Must Design: Toward a Critical Vocabulary for Games. In Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference, ed. Frans Mäyrä. Tampere University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi M 2009. Flow. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. De Kort YAW, Ijsselsteijn WA (2008) People, places, and play: player experience in a socio-spatial context. Comput Entertain 6(2). doi:10.1145/1371216.1371221Google Scholar
  13. DeKoven B. (2002) The well-played game: a playful path to wholeness. iUniverse, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. DeKoven B (2011) On coliberation: exploring the experience of having fun together [Internet]. Version 1. Bernie DeKoven’s Blog. http://berniedekoven.wordpress.com/article/on-coliberation-2hzxx66zkihpf-8/. Accessed 25 Sep 2011
  15. ESA Entertainment Software Association (2008) Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2008.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2008
  16. ESA. Entertainment Software Association (2014) Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ESA_EF_2014.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2015
  17. Fernaeus (2012) How do you design for the joy of movements. In Fernaeus Y, Holopainen J, Höök K, Ivarsson K, Karlsson A, Lindley S, Norlin C (eds) Plei-Plei. PPP Company Ltd., Hong Kong. http://plei-plei.info/thoughts/many-ways-of-moving-bodies/. Accessed 29 March 2015
  18. Fluegelman A, Tembeck S (1976) The new games book. Play hard, play fair, nobody hurt. A Headlands Press Book, Dolphin/DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  19. Fullerton T, Swain C, Hoffman S (2008) Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. Gama Network Series. Elsevier Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Gajadhar B, de Kort Y, IJsselsteijn W (2008) Influence of social setting on player experience of digital games. In CHI ’08 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’08,pp 3099–3104. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaver B (2011) Designing for homo Ludens, still. In: Binder T, Löwgren J, Malmborg L (eds) (Re)searching the digital bauhaus. Springer, London, pp 163–178. http://www.gold.ac.uk/media/46gaver-ludens-still.pdf Google Scholar
  22. Hartson HR (2003) Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behav Inf Technol 22:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatfield E, Cacioppo JT, Rapson RL (1994) Emotional contagion. Cambridge University Press, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Höök K (2008) Affective loop experiences—what are they? In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE ’08. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  25. Huizinga J (1955) Homo Ludens: a study of the play-element in culture. Beacon paperbacks. Beacon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Isbister K (2010) Enabling social play: a framework for design and evaluation. In: Bernhaupt R (ed) Evaluating user experience in games: concepts and methods. Springer, London, pp 11–22Google Scholar
  27. Isbister K (2011, September/October) Emotion and motion: games as inspiration for shaping the future of interface. Interactions 18(5):24–27Google Scholar
  28. Isbister K (2012) How to stop being a buzzkill: designing yamove!, A mobile tech mash-up to truly augment social play. Keynote presentation, abstract included in Proceedings of MobileHCI 2012, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  29. Isbister K, Schaffer N (2008) Game usability: advice from the experts for advancing the player experience. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  30. Isbister K, Schwekendiek U, Frye J (2011a) Wriggle: an exploration of emotional and social effects of movement. work in progress presented at CHI 2011. (Short paper included in Conference Proceedings)Google Scholar
  31. Isbister R, Schwekendiek U, Hayward E, Lidasan J (2011b) Is more movement better? A controlled comparison of movement-based games. Poster presented at Foundations of Digital Gaming 2011, Bordeaux (Short paper included in Conference Proceedings)Google Scholar
  32. Jakobs E, Manstead A, Fischer A (1996) Social context and the experience of emotion. J Nonverbal Behav 20(2):123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jakobs E, Fischer AH, Manstead AS (1997) Emotional experience as a function of social context: the role of the other. J Nonverbal Behav 21(2):103–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kavanagh LC, Suhler CL, Churchland PS, Winkielman P (2011) When it’s an error to mirror: the surprising reputational costs of mimicry. Psychol Sci 22(10):1274–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koivisto EMI, Suomela R (2007) Using prototypes in early pervasive game development. In: Proceedings of Sandbox Symposium 2007, San Diego, CA, pp 149–156. August 4–5Google Scholar
  36. Khut GP (2006) Engage: interaction, arts & audience experience, chapter interactive art as embodied enquiry: working with audience experience. Creativity and Cognition Studios Press, University of Technology, SidneyGoogle Scholar
  37. Khut GP (2007) Cardiomorphologies: an inner journey through art. IEEE MultiMedia 14(4):5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindley SE, Le Couteur J, Berthouze NL (2008) Stirring up experience through movement in game play: effects on engagement and social behaviour. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’08. ACM, New York, pp 511–514Google Scholar
  39. Lindström M, Ståhl A, Höök K, Sundström P, Laaksolathi J, Combetto M, Taylor A, Bresin R (2006) Affective diary: designing for bodily expressiveness and selfreflection. In: CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’06. ACM, New York, pp 1037–1042Google Scholar
  40. Loke L, Khut G (2011) Surging verticality: an experience of balance. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, TEI ’11. ACM, New York, pp 237–240Google Scholar
  41. Loke L, Robertson T (2013) Moving and making strange: An embodied approach to movement-based interaction design. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 20(1):7:1–7:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loke L, Larssen AT, Robertson T, Edwards J (2007, December) Understanding movement for interaction design: frameworks and approaches. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11(8):691–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loke L, Khut GP, Kocaballi AB (2012) Bodily experience and imagination: designing ritual interactions for participatory live-art contexts. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, DIS ’12. ACM, New York, pp 779–788Google Scholar
  44. Magerkurth C, Engelke T, Memisoglu M (2004) Augmenting the virtual domain with physical and social elements: towards a paradigm shift in computer entertainment technology. Adv Comput Entertain Technol 2(4):12Google Scholar
  45. Mandryk RL, Inkpen KM, Calvert TW (2006) Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behav Informat Technol 25(2):141–158Google Scholar
  46. Manstead T (2005) The social dimension of emotion. Psychologist 18(8):484–487Google Scholar
  47. Márquez Segura E (2013) Body games: designing for movement-based play in co-located social settings. Licentiate thesis dissertation. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  48. Márquez Segura E, Johansson C, Moen J, Waern A (2011) Bodies, boogies, bugs and buddies—shall we play? In: Yi-Luen Do E, Gross MD, Oakley I (eds) Work-in-progress workshop proceedings on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction, TEI ’11. ACM SIGCHI, pp 115–120Google Scholar
  49. Márquez Segura E, Waern A, Moen J, Johansson C (2013) The design space of body games: technological, physical, and social design. In: Proceedings of CHI’13. ACM, New York, pp 3365–3374Google Scholar
  50. Moen J (2006) KinAesthetic Movement Interaction. Designing for the Pleasure of Motion. PhD thesis, KTHGoogle Scholar
  51. Moen J (2007) From hand-held to body-worn: embodied experiences of the design and use of a wearable movement-based interaction concept. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, TEI ’07. ACM, New York, pp 251–258Google Scholar
  52. Mueller F, Givvs MR, Frank V (2010) Towards understanding how to design for social play in exertion games. J Personal Ubiquitous Comput 14(5):417–424. Springer PublisherGoogle Scholar
  53. Mueller FF, Isbister K (2014) Movement-based game guidelines. In: Proceedings of CHI 2014. Toronto, pp 2191–2200Google Scholar
  54. Oulasvirta A, Kurvinen E, Kankainen T (2003) Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming. Pers Ubiquit Comput 7:125–134. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0238-7Google Scholar
  55. Paiva A, Chaves R, Piedade M, Bullock A, Andersson G, Höök K (2003) Sentoy: a tangible interface to control the emotions of a synthetic character. In: Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS’03. ACM, New York, pp 1088–1089Google Scholar
  56. Piaget J (1999) The moral judgment of the child. Developmental psychology: Routledge. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Ravaja N, Saari T, Turpeinen M, Laarni J, Salminen M, Kivikangas M (2006) Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: does it matter with whom you play? Presence 15(4):381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reeves S (2011) Designing interfaces in public settings: understanding the role of the spectator in human-computer interaction. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  59. Reeves S, Benford S, O’Malley C, Fraser M (2005) Designing the spectator experience. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’05). ACM, New York, pp 741–750Google Scholar
  60. Salen K, Zimmerman E (2003) Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Schleicher D, Jones P, Kachur O (2010) Bodystorming as embodied designing. Interactions 17(6):47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shusterman R (2008) Body consciousness: a philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simon B (2009) Wii are out of control: Bodies, game screens and the production of gestural excess. Loading 3(4)Google Scholar
  64. Simbelis V, Höök K (2013) Metaphone: an artistic exploration of biofeedback and machine aesthetics. In: CHI ’13 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’13. ACM, New York, pp 2995–2998Google Scholar
  65. Ståhl A, Höök K, Svensson M, Taylor AS, Combetto M (2009) Experiencing the affective diary. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 13(5):365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stenros J, Paavilainen J, Mäyrä F (2009) The many faces of sociability and social play in games. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: everyday life in the Ubiquitous Era, MindTrek ’09. ACM, New York, pp 82–89Google Scholar
  67. Suits B (1978) The grasshopper: games, life and utopia. Broadview encore editions. Broadview Press, Printed in CanadaGoogle Scholar
  68. Szentgyorgyi C, Terry M, Lank E (2008) Renegade gaming: practices surrounding social use of the Nintendo DS handheld gaming system. CHI 2008 Proceedings, pp 1463–1472Google Scholar
  69. Taylor TL (2006) Play between worlds: exploring online game culture. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Tholander J, Johansson C (2010a) Bodies, boards, clubs and bugs: a study of bodily engaging artifacts. In: Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA ’10. ACM, New York, pp 4045–4050Google Scholar
  71. Tholander J, Johansson C (2010b) Design qualities for whole body interaction: learning from golf, skateboarding and bodybugging. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI’ 10. ACM, New York, pp 493–502Google Scholar
  72. Tisserand D (2010) PlayStation: evolving user testing to social, casual and portable gaming. Presentation at GDC 2010. In: GDC vault. http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1012600/PlayStation__Evolving_User_Testing_to_Social,_Casual_and_Portable_Gaming?sid=1012600. Accessed 29 March 2015
  73. Valdesolo P, DeSteno D (2011) Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion 11(2):262–266. doi:10.1037/a0021302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Voida A, Greenberg S (2009) Wii all play: the console game as a computational meeting place. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’09. ACM, New York, pp 1559–1568Google Scholar
  75. Waern A (2009) Information technology in pervasive games pervasive games: theory and design. In: Morgan Kaufmann Game Design Books. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers/Elsevier, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilde D (2008) The hipdiskettes: learning (through) wearables. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian COnputer-Human Interaction Conference, OZCHI ’08. ACMGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilde D, Schiphorst T, Klooster S (2011) Move to design/design to move: a conversation about designing for the body. Interactions 18(4):22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson D (2011) Brutally unfair tactics totally ok now: on self-effacing games and unachievements. Game Stud 11(1). http://gamestudies.org/1101/articles/wilson. Accessed 29 March 2015
  79. Wilson D (2012) Designing for the pleasures of disputation-or-how to make friends by trying to kick them! Ph.D. dissertation. http://doougle.net/phd/Designing_for_the_Pleasures_of_Disputation.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2015
  80. Zagal JP, Nussbaum M, Rosas R (2000) A model to support the design of multiplayer games. Presence: teleoper. Virtual Environ 9(5):448–462Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Informatics and MediaUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.New York UniversityBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations