Social-Software-Based Support for Enterprise Architecture Management Processes

  • Rainer Schmidt
  • Alfred Zimmermann
  • Michael Möhring
  • Dierk Jugel
  • Florian Bär
  • Christian M. Schweda
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 202)

Abstract

Modern enterprises reshape and transform continuously by a multitude of management processes with different perspectives. They range from business process management to IT service management and the management of the information systems. Enterprise Architecture (EA) Management seeks to provide such a perspective and to align the diverse management perspectives. Therefore, EA Management cannot rely on hierarchic - in a tayloristic manner designed - management processes to achieve and promote this alignment. It, conversely, has to apply bottom-up, information-centered coordination mechanisms to ensure that different management processes are aligned with each other and enterprise strategy. Social software provides such a bottom-up mechanism for providing support within EAM-processes. Consequently, challenges of EA management processes are investigated, and contributions of social software presented. A cockpit provides interactive functions and visualization methods to cope with this complexity and enable the practical use of social software in enterprise architecture management processes.

Keyword

Enterprise architecture management processes 

References

  1. 1.
    Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: It Governance: How Top Performers Manage It Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haren, V.: TOGAF Version 9.1. Van Haren Publishing, Amersfoort (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haren, V.: Archimate 2.0 Specification. Van Haren Publishing Series. Van Haren Publishing, Amersfoort (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Stationery Office: The Official Introduction to the ITIL 3 Service Lifecycle: Office of Government Commerce. The Stationery Office Ltd., London (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, P., Lagerström, R., Ekstedt, M., Österlind, M.: IT Management with Enterprise Architecture. KTH, Stockholm (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt, R., Nurcan, S.: BPM and social software. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 649–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schmidt, R., Nurcan, S.: Augmenting BPM with social software. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 201–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benkler, Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A.: On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 26(3), 145–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds: : Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. Anchor, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy, vol. 1. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buckl, S.M.: Developing organization-specific enterprise architecture management functions using a method base. Dissertation, Technische Universität München, München (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schweda, C.M.: Development of organization-specific enterprise architecture modeling languages using building blocks. Dissertation, Technische Universität München, München (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zimmermann, A., Buckow, H., Groß, H.-J., Nandico, O.F., Piller, G., Prott, K.: Capability diagnostics of enterprise service architectures using a dedicated software architecture reference model. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 592–599 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zimmermann, A., Pretz, M., Zimmermann, G., Firesmith, D.G., Petrov, I.: Towards service-oriented enterprise architectures for big data applications in the cloud. In: 2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 130–135 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matthes, F., Buckl, S., Leitel, J., Schweda, C.M.: Enterprise Architecture Management Tool Survey 2008. Technische Universität München (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, F.W.: The Principles of Scientific Management, vol. 202. Harper and Brothers, New York (1911)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruno, G.: requirements elicitation as a case of social process: an approach to its description. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Sadiq, S., Leymann, F. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 43, pp. 243–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swenson, K.D.: Mastering The Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize The Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Do. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bruno, G., Dengler, F., Jennings, B., Khalaf, R., Nurcan, S., Prilla, M., Sarini, M., Schmidt, R., Silva, R.: Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. Res. Pract. 23(4), 297–326 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tapscott, D., Williams, A.: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Penguin, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montgomery, D.C., Peck, E.A., Vining, G.G.: Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, vol. 821. Wiley, New York (2012)MATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prybutok, V.R., Yi, J., Mitchell, D.: Comparison of neural network models with ARIMA and regression models for prediction of Houston’s daily maximum ozone concentrations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 122(1), 31–40 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hagan, M.T., Demuth, H.B., Beale, M.H., et al.: Neural Network Design. PWS Pub., Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dumitru, V., Luban, F.: On some optimization problems under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18(3), 257–272 (1986)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. S. die erste B. für diesen A. ab. Research Methodology and Statistical Analysis for M.Com. V K Publications (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tan, A.-H.: Text mining: the state of the art and the challenges. In: Proceedings of the PAKDD 1999 Workshop on Knowledge Disocovery from Advanced Databases, pp. 65–70 (1999)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tan, P.-N., Blau, H., Harp, S., Goldman, R.: Textual data mining of service center call records. In: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 417–423 (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jugel, D., Schweda, C.M.: Interactive functions of a cockpit for enterprise architecture planning. Presented at the TEAR 2014, Ulm, Germany, 1–5 September 2014Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hauder, M., Roth, S., Schulz, C., Matthes, F.: Agile enterprise architecture management: an analysis on the application of agile principles. In: International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design BMSD 2014, Luxemburg (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hanschke, I.: Strategisches Management der IT-Landschaft. Auflage Hanser, München (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mueller, T., Schuldt, D., Sewald, B., Morisse, M., Petrikina, J.: Towards inter-organizational Enterprise Architecture Management-Applicability of TOGAF 9.1 for Network Organizations (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Emery, D., Hilliard, R.: Every architecture description needs a framework: expressing architecture frameworks using ISO/IEC 42010. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2009 & European Conference on Software Architecture. WICSA/ECSA 2009, pp. 31–40 (2009)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koschmider, A., Song, M., Reijers, H.A.: Social software for business process modeling. J. Inf. Technol. 25(3), 308–322 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Erol, S., Granitzer, M., Happ, S., Jantunen, S., Jennings, B., Johannesson, P., Koschmider, A., Nurcan, S., Rossi, D., Schmidt, R.: Combining BPM and social software: contradiction or chance? J. Softw. Maint. Evol. Res. Pract. 22(6–7), 449–476 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holden, T., Wilhelmij, P.: Improved decision making through better integration of human resource and business process factors in a hospital situation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 12(3), 21–41 (1995)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Stelzer, D.: Enterprise architecture principles: literature review and research directions. In: Dan, A., Gittler, F., Toumani, F. (eds.) ICSOC/ServiceWave 2009. LNCS, vol. 6275, pp. 12–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pulkkinen, M.: Systemic management of architectural decisions in enterprise architecture planning. Four dimensions and three abstraction levels. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006, HICSS 2006, vol. 8, p. 179a (2006)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Simonsson, M., Lindström, A., Johnson, P., Nordström, L., Grundbäck, J., Wijnbladh, O.: Scenario-based evaluation of enterprise architecture - a top-down approach for chief information officer decision making (2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Riempp, G., Gieffers-Ankel, S.: Application portfolio management: a decision-oriented view of enterprise architecture. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 5(4), 359–378 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Schmidt
    • 1
  • Alfred Zimmermann
    • 2
  • Michael Möhring
    • 3
  • Dierk Jugel
    • 2
    • 4
  • Florian Bär
    • 1
  • Christian M. Schweda
    • 5
  1. 1.Munich University of Applied SciencesMunichGermany
  2. 2.Reutlingen UniversityReutlingenGermany
  3. 3.Aalen UniversityAalenGermany
  4. 4.University of RostockRostockGermany
  5. 5.LeanIT42 GmbHGarching bei MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations