NAO-mark vs QR-code Recognition by NAO Robot Vision

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 351)

Abstract

Nowadays, the research on robot on-map localization while using landmarks is more intensively dealing with visual code recognition. One of the most popular landmarks of this type is the QR-code. This paper is devoted to the experimental evaluation of vision-based on-map localization procedures that apply QR-codes or NAO marks, as implemented in service robot control systems. In particular, the NAO humanoid robot is our test-bed platform, while the use of robotic systems for hazard detection is the motivation of this study. Especially, the robot can be a useful aid for elderly people affected by dementia and cognitive disorientation. The detection of the door opening is assumed to be important to ensure safety in the home environment. Thus, the paper focus on door opening detection while using QR-codes.

Keywords

assistant robot image processing localization landmark recognition QR-code NAO mark 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Li, W., Duan, F., Chen, B., Yuan, J., Tan, J.T.C., Xu, B.: Mobile robot action based on qr code identification. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kobayashil, H.: A new proposal for self-localization of mobile robot by self-contained 2d barcode landmark. In: 2012 Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference, SICE (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deyle, T., Reynolds, M.S., Kemp, C.C.: Finding and navigating to household objects with uhf rfid tags by optimizing rf signal strength. In: Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    George, L., Mazel, A.: Humanoid robot indoor navigation based on 2d bar codes: Application to the nao robot. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Humanoids (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fiala, M.: Artag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng, R., Yuan, K.: Mr code for indoor robot self-localization. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dzodzo, B., Han, L., Chen, X., Qian, H., Xu, Y.: Realtime 2d code based localization for indoor robot navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Figat, J., Kornuta, T., Kasprzak, W.: Performance evaluation of binary descriptors of local features. In: Chmielewski, L.J., Kozera, R., Shin, B.-S., Wojciechowski, K. (eds.) ICCVG 2014. LNCS, vol. 8671, pp. 187–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Control and Computation EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations