Specification of Abstract Robot Skills in Terms of Control System Behaviours

  • Tomasz Kornuta
  • Tomasz Winiarski
  • Cezary Zieliński
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 351)

Abstract

Robotic systems possess diverse effectors and receptors influencing their capabilities. For this reason description of robot tasks in a human-understandable form, being strict and abstracting the hardware limitations at the one hand, yet enabling straightforward transformation into robot actions at the other, has been elusive. Herein we propose a method of specification of tasks in terms of abstract object-level relations. This approach imposes the introduction of manipulation primitives modifying those relations by influencing object parameters. To narrow the scope of research in this paper we focus on one of the most elementary robot skills: grasping. We decompose the robot control system using the embodied agent-based methodology, define a set of required behaviours and express the skill as a sequence of those behaviours. To enable the future automatic translation from specification to code, we developed a formal specification of the introduced concepts.

Keywords

embodied agent robot behaviours robot skills grasping force control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kelly, S., Tolvanen, J.P.: Domain-Specific Modeling: Enabling full code generation. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Press (April 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gronback, R.C.: Eclipse Modeling Project: A Domain-Specific Language (DSL) Toolkit. Addison-Wesley Professional (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schlegel, C., Wörz, R.: Interfacing different layers of a multilayer architecture for sensorimotor systems using the object-oriented framework smartsoft. In: 3rd European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots, Eurobot 1999, Zürich, Switzerland (September 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alonso, D., Vicente-Chicote, C., Ortiz, F., Pastor, J., Alvarez, B.: V3cmm: a 3-view component meta-model for model-driven robotic software development. Journal of Software Engineering for Robotics 1(1), 3–17 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Björkelund, A., Malec, J., Nilsson, K., Nugues, P., Bruyninckx, H.: Knowledge for intelligent industrial robots. In: Proc. AAAI (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lortal, G., Dhouib, S., Gérard, S.: Integrating ontological domain knowledge into a robotic DSL. In: Dingel, J., Solberg, A. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6627, pp. 401–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dhouib, S., Kchir, S., Stinckwich, S., Ziadi, T., Ziane, M.: Robotml, a domain-specific language to design, simulate and deploy robotic applications. In: Noda, I., Ando, N., Brugali, D., Kuffner, J.J. (eds.) SIMPAR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7628, pp. 149–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kornuta, T., Zieliński, C.: Robot control system design exemplified by multi-camera visual servoing. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 1–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zieliński, C.: TORBOL: An object level robot programming language. Mechatronics 1(4), 469–485 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zieliński, C., Kornuta, T.: Specification of tasks in terms of object-level relations for a two-handed robot. In: Szewczyk, R., Zieliński, C., Kaliczyńska, M. (eds.) Recent Advances in Automation, Robotics and Measuring Techniques. AISC, vol. 267, pp. 543–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tenorth, M., Beetz, M.: Knowrob: A knowledge processing infrastructure for cognition-enabled robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research 32(5), 566–590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Archibald, C., Petriu, E.: Skills-oriented robot programming. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems IAS-3, pp. 104–115 (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malec, J., Nilsson, K., Bruyninckx, H.: Describing assembly tasks in declarative way. In: Proc. IEEE ICRA 2013 Workshop on Semantics, Identification and Control of Robot-Human-Environment Interaction (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zieliński, C., Szynkiewicz, W., Winiarski, T., Staniak, M., Czajewski, W., Kornuta, T.: Rubik’s cube as a benchmark validating MRROC++ as an implementation tool for service robot control systems. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 34(5), 368–375 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zieliński, C.: Specification of behavioural embodied agents. In: Kozłowski, K. (ed.) Fourth International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo 2004), June 17-20, pp. 79–84 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zieliński, C., Winiarski, T.: Motion generation in the MRROC++ robot programming framework. International Journal of Robotics Research 29(4), 386–413 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winiarski, T., Woźniak, A.: Indirect force control development procedure. Robotica 31, 465–478 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mason, M.: Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (11), 418–432 (1981)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruyninckx, H., De Schutter, J.: Specification of Force-Controlled Actions in the Task Frame Formalism: A Synthesis. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 12(4), 581–589 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Kornuta
    • 1
  • Tomasz Winiarski
    • 1
  • Cezary Zieliński
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Control and Computation Eng.Warsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations