Advertisement

Overview

  • Viola Prifti
Part of the International Law and Economics book series (ILEC)

Abstract

This chapter presents the major findings of this study. It illustrates to what extent article 30 allows the impairment of patent rights and to what degree societal concerns may be relevant for interpreting article 30. Additionally, it indicates the role of national case law and legislation in shaping the rationale of exceptions and the interpretation of article 30, and it points to the importance of economic reasoning and empirical studies in assessing the compliance of the breeding exception. Finally, suggestions for adopting an exception to patent rights with breeding purposes are put forward.

Keywords

Plant Breeding Limited Exception Patent Protection Patent System Legitimate Interest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Correa, C. (2005). The international dimension of the research exception. Advancing Science, Serving Society. Available at http://sippi.aaas.org/Pubs/Correa_International%20Exception.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2012.
  2. Eisenberg, R. S. (1987). Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law Journal, 97(2), 177, 225.Google Scholar
  3. Eisenberg, R. S. (1989). Patents and the progress of science: Exclusive rights and experimental use. University Chicago Law Review, 56(1017), 1078.Google Scholar
  4. Gilat, D. (1995). Experimental use and patents. In F.-K. Beier & G. Schricker (Eds.), Studies in industrial property and copyright law. The Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law (p. 44). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Hantman, R. D. (1985). Experimental use as an exception to patent infringement. Journal of the Patent and the Trademark Office Society, 67, 617.Google Scholar
  6. Israelsen, N. A. (1988–1989). Making, using and selling without infringing: An examination of 35 U.S.C. Sec. 271 and the experimental use exception to patent infringement. American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, 16, 457, 469.Google Scholar
  7. Mueller, J. M. (2001). No ‘Dilettante Affair’: Rethinking the experimental use exception to patent infringement for biomedical research tools. Washington Law Review, 76.Google Scholar
  8. Strandburg, K. J. (2013). What does the public get? Experimental use and the patent bargain (p. 37). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id¼438023. Accessed 5 May 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viola Prifti
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Innovation and CompetitionMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations