Advertisement

Control of Hand Prosthesis Using Fusion of Biosignals and Information from Prosthesis Sensors

  • Andrzej WolczowskiEmail author
  • Marek Kurzynski
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 595)

Abstract

In this chapter we present an advanced method of recognition of patient’s intention to move the multi-articulated prosthetic hand during grasping and manipulation of objects in a skillful manner. The proposed method is based on a 2-level multiclassier system (MCS) with base classifiers dedicated to particular types of biosignals: electromyography (EMG) and mechanomyography (MMG) signals, and with combining mechanism using a dynamic ensemble selection scheme and probabilistic competence function. To improve the precision and reliability of prosthesis control, the feedback signal derived from the prosthesis sensors is used. We present two original concepts of using such a signal. In the 1st method, the feedback signal is treated as a source of information about a correct class of hand movement and competence functions of base classifiers are dynamically tuned according to this information. In the 2nd one, classification procedure is organized into multistage process based on a decision tree scheme and consequently, feedback signal indicating an interior node of a tree allows us to narrow down the set of classes. The performance of MCS with feedback signal were experimentally tested on real datasets. The obtained results show that developed methodology can be practically applied to design a control system for dexterous bioprosthetic hand.

Keywords

Base Classifier Feedback Signal Short Time Fourier Transform Rest Position Correct Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financed from the National Science Center resources in 2012–2014 years as a research project No ST6/06168, and from Wroclaw University of Technology as a statutory project.

References

  1. 1.
    Boostanl, B., Moradi, M.: Evaluation of the forearm EMG signal features for the control of a prosthetic hand. Physiol. Meas. 24, 309–319 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Luca, C.: Electromyography. In: Webster, J.G. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation, pp. 98–109. Wiley, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Englehart, K.: Signal representation for classification of the transient myoelectric signal. Ph.D. Thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuncheva, I.: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurzynski, M., Wolczowski, A.: Dynamic selection of classifier ensemble applied to the recognition of EMG signal for the control of bioprosthetic hand. In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Seoul, pp. 175–182 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurzynski, M., Wolczowski, A., Tito, A.: Control of bioprosthetic hand based on EMG and MMG signals recognition using multiclassifier system with feedback from the prosthesis sensors. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Systems and Control, Marrakesch, pp. 127–135 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurzynski, M., Wolczowski, A.: Classification of EMG signals in a system for training of bioprosthetic hand control in one side handless human. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science EECS12, Szanghai, pp. 566–576 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nishikawa, D.: Studies on Electromyogram to Motion Classifier. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orizio, C.: Muscle sound: basis for the introduction of a mechanomyographic signal in muscle studies. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21, 201–243 (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolczowski, A.: Smart hand: the concept of sensor based control. In: Proceedings of 7th IEEE International Symposium MMAR, Miedzyzdroje, pp. 783–790 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolczowski, A., Kurzynski, M.: Control of Artificial Hand Via Recognition of EMG Signals, LNCS, vol. 3337. Springer, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wolczowski, A., Kurzynski, M.: Control of dexterous hand via recognition of EMG signals using combination of decision-tree and sequential classifier. Adv. Soft Comput. 45, 687–694 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wolczowski, A., Krysztoforski, K.: Artificial hand control via EMG signal classification—experimental investigation of algorithms. In: Tchon, K., Warszawa, W.K.L. (ed.) Progress in Robotics, pp. 97–122 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolczowski, A., Kurzynski, M.: Human-machine interface in bio-prosthesis control using EMG signal classification. Expert Syst. 27, 53–70 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolczowski, A., Kurzynski, M., Zaplotny, P.: Concept of a system for training of biopros-thetic hand control in one side handless humans using virtual reality and visual and sensory biofeedback. Med. Inf. Technol. 18, 85–91 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woloszynski, T., Kurzynski, M.: On a new measure of classifier competence applied to the design of multiclassifier systems. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 5716, 995–1004 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Woloszynski, T., Kurzynski, M.: A probabilistic model of classifier competence for dynamic ensemble selection. Pattern Recognit. 44, 2656–2668 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zecca, M., Micera, S., Carrozza, M., Dario, P.: Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 30, 459–485 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations