A Ubiquitous, Pen-Based And Touch Classroom Response System Supported By Learning Styles

  • Ricardo CaceffoEmail author
  • Heloisa Vieira da Rocha
  • Rodolfo Azevedo
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


The Active Learning Model (ALM) is an educational model which proposes that students should participate, along with the teacher, as direct agents of their learning process. Computer systems created to implement and support the ALM are known as Classroom Response Systems (CRS). The CRS, usually supported by traditional pen-based Tablet PCs, allow the teacher to propose activities and exercises to students, receive back their answers, discuss the results and provide feedback.

However, researchers point several problems regarding the CRS use, as the inadequacy of the traditional pen-based Tablet PCs, which have disadvantages related to their size and weight, hard configuration and usability problems. Another problem is the pedagogical approach applied to build these systems, which don’t consider individual student’s needs.

Still, we have the ascension of new pen-based and touch mobile devices (e.g., iPad), light and thin enough to support new educational approaches, like the Ubiquitous Learning. This approach proposes the use of context information to measure and customize the applications according to each student’s needs, thus supporting the creation of a Ubiquitous CRS (UCRS).

In this way, we propose a UCRS supported by the prediction of student’s learning styles. Initially focused on higher education, it supports the automatic identification of the students’ learning styles and the submission of activities that best fit each one of the students. We expect it will enhance the students learning experience, thus better supporting the ALM.


  1. 1.
    Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Davis, K., Linnell, N., Prince, C., & Razmov, V. (2007). Supporting active learning and example based instruction with classroom technology. Proceeding ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, New York, NY, USA, 39(1):69–73 (ACM).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report Number 1, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabada, R., Estrada, M., & García, C. (2011). EDUCA: A web 2.0 authoring tool for developing adaptive and intelligent tutoring systems using a Kohonen network. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8):9522–9529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caceffo, R. E., & Rocha, H. V. (2011). Ubiquitous classroom response system: An innovative approach to support the active learning model. In Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 3(1):41–60 (Common Ground Publishing LLC. Champaign, Illinois, USA).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caceffo, R. E., & Rocha, H. V. (2012). Design and model of a ubiquitous classroom response system through context factors. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 4(3):67–77 (Common Ground Publishing LLC. Champaign, Illinois, USA).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caceffo, R. E., Rocha, H. V., & Azevedo, R. J. (2011). Ferramenta de apoio para o aprendizado ativo usando dispositivos com caneta eletrônica. Revista Brasileira de Informação na Educação, 19:25–41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2012). Beyond arcade machines: students building interactive tangible installations. In Proceeding The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System, New York, NY, USA. Article No. 16. ACMGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ertmer, P., Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59, 423–435 (Elsevier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felder, M., & Silverman, K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7):674–681.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Felder, M., & Soloman, B. (2012). Learning styles and strategies, Accessed August 20, 2012.
  11. 11.
    Hsieh, S., Jang, Y., Hwang, G., & Chen, N. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education—An International Journal, 57(1):1194–1201 (Elsevier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Latham, A., Crockett, K., McLean, D., & Edmonds, B. (2012) A conversational intelligent tutoring system to automatically predict learning styles. Computers & Education—An International Journal, 59(1):95–109 (Elsevier).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levis, D., et al. (2008). Aperfeiçoamento automático do perfil do aprendiz em ambientes de educação ubíqua. Em Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 16(1)29–41. Janeiro a Abril.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vahey, P., Tatar, D., & Roshelle, J. (2007). Using handheld technology to move between private and public interactions in the classroom. In M. Hooft & K. Swan (Eds.), Ubiquitous computing in education: Invisible technology, visible impact. (pp. 187–211) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolfman, S. (2004). Understanding and promoting interaction in the classroom through computer-mediated communication in the classroom presenter system. Ph.D thesis. University of Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yannibelli, V., Godoy, D., & Amandi, A. (2006). A genetic algorithm approach to recognize students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(1):55–78 (Routledge Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Caceffo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Heloisa Vieira da Rocha
    • 1
  • Rodolfo Azevedo
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ComputingState University of Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrasil

Personalised recommendations