Advertisement

Adaptive Packet Size Control for Bulk Data Transmission in IPv6 over Networks of Resource Constrained Nodes

  • Yang Deng
  • Zhonghong Ou
  • Antti Ylä-Jääski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8965)

Abstract

Conventional transmission in IPv6 over Networks of Resource Constrained Nodes (6lo) favours fixed-size packets and results in low network performance when bulk data transmission is required by applications, for example firmware updating. To tackle this problem, we first investigate performance of bulk data transmission through large packets and make two important observations. Then we propose an adaptive mechanism at IP layer to dynamically adjust packet size in 6lo. We implemented the mechanism on Contiki OS and evaluated it through a series of experiments in Cooja. Experimental results demonstrate that our mechanism outperforms Contiki standard implementation significantly from both reliability and goodput under various network conditions.

Keywords

6lo Bulk Data Transmission Packet Size Control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baccour, N., Koubâa, A., Mottola, L., Zúñiga, M.A., Youssef, H., Boano, C.A., Alves, M.: Radio link quality estimation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 8(4), 34:1–34:33 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dong, W., Liu, X., Chen, C., He, Y., Chen, G., Liu, Y., Bu, J.: DPLC: Dynamic Packet Length Control in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2010, pp. 1–9 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jelenković, P.R., Tan, J.: Dynamic Packet Fragmentation for Wireless Channels with Failures. In: Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2008, pp. 73–82 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, S., Fonseca, R., Dutta, P., Tavakoli, A., Culler, D., Levis, P., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Flush: A Reliable Bulk Transport Protocol for Multihop Wireless Networks. In: Proceedings of ACM SenSys 2007, pp. 351–365 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Modiano, E.: An Adaptive Algorithm for Optimizing the Packet Size Used in Wireless ARQ Protocols. Wireless Networks 5(4), 279–286 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., Culler, D.: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks. RFC 4944 (Proposed Standard) (September 2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ou, Z., Harjula, E., Ylianttila, M.: Effects of different churn models on the performance of structured peer-to-peer networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC 2009, pp. 2856–2860 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Akyildiz, I., McLaughlin, S.W.: Energy efficiency based packet size optimization in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, pp. 1–8 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vuran, M.C., Akyildiz, I.: Cross-Layer Packet Size Optimization for Wireless Terrestrial, Underwater, and Underground Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2008, pp. 780–788 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Deng
    • 1
  • Zhonghong Ou
    • 1
  • Antti Ylä-Jääski
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations