Advertisement

Laparoscopy, SILS, and NOTES for Acute Appendicitis

  • Matteo Mandrioli
  • Aneel Bhangu
  • Kjetil Soreide
  • Arianna Birindelli
  • Ferdinando Agresta
  • Stefano Pretolani
  • Alice Piccinini
  • Francesca Nigro
  • Elio Jovine
  • Salomone Di SaverioEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In today’s world of medical procedure, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is well accepted as the gold standard of care in cases of acute appendicitis [15, 23]. Many studies demonstrate LA to be feasible, safe, and effective when compared to the traditional open appendectomy (OA) alternative [18, 19, 26, 27, 32, 33]. These studies show LA to be superior to OA due to shortened hospital stays, lower complication rates, earlier returns to work, and resumption of normal activity [31, 43].

Keywords

Acute Appendicitis Laparoscopic Appendectomy Open Appendectomy Complicated Appendicitis SILS Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

All figures and intraoperative pictures have been provided by Dr. Salomone Di Saverio MD FACS FRCS and belong to his own library of personal surgical procedures of laparoscopic appendectomy or SILS appendectomy, performed in acute care surgery setting.

Supplementary material

Video 24.1

(MP4 72440 kb)

Video 24.2

(MP4 243278 kb)

Video 24.3

(MP4 1538347 kb)

Video 24.4

(MP4 1084753 kb)

Video 24.5

(MP4 416298 kb)

Video 24.6

(MP4 445613 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed I, Paraskeva P. A clinical review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surgeon. 2011;9(6):341–51. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.06.003S1479-666X(11)00092-8 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asge, Sages. ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery white paper october 2005. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(2):199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.007. S0016-5107(05)03412-7 [pii].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beldi G, Vorburger SA, Bruegger LE, Kocher T, Inderbitzin D, Candinas D. Analysis of stapling versus endoloops in appendiceal stump closure. Br J Surg. 2006;93(11):1390–3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5474.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M. Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(4):245–55. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318058a11700129689-200708000-00002 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bingener J, Ibrahim-zada I. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for intra-abdominal emergency conditions. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e80–9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9352.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carus T. Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398(7):925–9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1113-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, Darzi LA, Paraskeva P. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2567–74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1004-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engstrom L, Fenyo G. Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1985;72(12):971–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P. Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2013;257(3):413–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318278d22500000658-201303000-00007 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, Wall DR, Miller BJ, Menzies BL. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial. World J Surg. 1996;20(1):17–20; discussion 21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harrell AG, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ, Kuwada TS, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT. Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly. Am Surg. 2006;72(6):474–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hart R, Rajgopal C, Plewes A, Sweeney J, Davies W, Gray D, Taylor B. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients. Can J Surg. 1996;39(6):457–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayashi M, Asakuma M, Komeda K, Miyamoto Y, Hirokawa F, Tanigawa N. Effectiveness of a surgical glove port for single port surgery. World J Surg. 2010;34(10):2487–9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0649-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(10):1204–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heinzelmann M, Simmen HP, Cummins AS, Largiader F. Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new ‘gold standard’? Arch Surg. 1995;130(7):782–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hompes R, Lindsey I, Jones OM, Guy R, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, Cahill RA. Step-wise integration of single-port laparoscopic surgery into routine colorectal surgical practice by use of a surgical glove port. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(2):165–71. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0686-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hua J, Gong J, Xu B, Yang T, Song Z. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(2):426–36. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2328-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang MT, Wei PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ. Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(5):306–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):334–7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8927-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kald A, Kullman E, Anderberg B, Wiren M, Carlsson P, Ringqvist I, Rudberg C. Cost-minimisation analysis of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(6):579–82. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kazemier G, de Zeeuw GR, Lange JF, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(4):336–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kazemier G, in’t Hof KH, Saad S, Bonjer HJ, Sauerland S. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling? Surg Endosc. 2006;20(9):1473–6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0525-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(31):4909–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, Kim KK, Park YH, Lee WK, Baek JH, Lee TH. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):214–8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318273bde4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee YS, Kim JH, Moon EJ, Kim JJ, Lee KH, Oh SJ, Park SM, Hong TH. Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(6):493–6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181c1549300129689-200912000-00015 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lintula H, Kokki H, Vanamo K, Valtonen H, Mattila M, Eskelinen M. The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(1):34–7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.1.34158/1/34 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, Ilstrup DM, Baerga-Varela Y, Sarr MG, Laparoscopic Appendectomy Interest Group. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001;129(4):390–400. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.114216. S0039-6060(01)15621-7 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Macarulla E, Vallet J, Abad JM, Hussein H, Fernandez E, Nieto B. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7(4):335–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Di Franco F, Harris AM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(13):1709–18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9296.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCahill LE, Pellegrini CA, Wiggins T, Helton WS. A clinical outcome and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1996;171(5):533–7. S0002961096000220 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K. Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(10):1929–39. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1972-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG, Wesselhoeft Jr CW, Tracy Jr TF, Luks FI. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(2):242–5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8140-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(9):1193–5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2165-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg. 1995;169(2):208–12; discussion 212–203. S000296109980138X [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M. Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES--world’s first report. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(5):1343–7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9811-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Park YH, Kang MY, Jeong MS, Choi H, Kim HH. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy using a homemade single-port device for single-system ectopic ureter in a child: initial case report. J Endourol. 2009;23(5):833–5. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pelosi MA, Pelosi 3rd MA. Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992;37(7):588–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.038S1072-7515(10)00123-7 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sajid MS, Rimple J, Cheek E, Baig MK. Use of endo-GIA versus endo-loop for securing the appendicular stump in laparoscopic appendicectomy: a systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(1):11–5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31818a66ab00129689-200902000-00003 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15(2):59–64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, Sharp SW, Garey CL, Laituri CA, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb 3rd GW, Ostlie DJ. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):586–90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823003b500000658-201110000-00006 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Poon MC, Wong SK, Leong HT, Lai PB, Ng EK. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of laparoendoscopic single-site access versus conventional 3-port appendectomy. Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):909–14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182765fcf00000658-201212000-00008 [pii].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wei B, Qi CL, Chen TF, Zheng ZH, Huang JL, Hu BG, Wei HB. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1199–208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1344-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo Mandrioli
    • 1
  • Aneel Bhangu
    • 2
  • Kjetil Soreide
    • 3
  • Arianna Birindelli
    • 1
  • Ferdinando Agresta
    • 4
  • Stefano Pretolani
    • 1
  • Alice Piccinini
    • 1
  • Francesca Nigro
    • 1
  • Elio Jovine
    • 1
  • Salomone Di Saverio
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.BolognaItaly
  2. 2.Academic Department of SurgeryQueen Elizabeth HospitalBirmingham B15 2THUK
  3. 3.Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
  4. 4.Department of General SurgeryULSS19 del VenetoAdriaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Emergency and SurgeryMaggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna,BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations