Ambient Vibration Testing of Historic Steel-Composite Bridge, the E. Torroja Bridge, for Structural Identification and Finite Element Model Updating

  • E. García-Macías
  • R. Castro-Triguero
  • R. Gallego
  • J. Carretero
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)

Abstract

The E. Torroja Bridge is a steel-composite bridge which combines inverted steel arch trusses with a concrete deck. This bridge crosses the Guadalquivir River in the small town of Posadas, 30 km far from Córdoba, Spain. It was E. Torroja, the renowned civil engineer who designed and built it until its inauguration in 1951 with an original deck 7 m width. Nevertheless, in 1995 it was remodeled by the author’s grandson, José Antonio Torroja, who raised the width of the deck to 11 m and added two new inverted steel arches beside the original ones. In order to assess the structural health condition of the bridge, ambient vibration tests were carried out in June 2014.

The assessment procedures include full-scale ambient vibration testing, modal identification from ambient vibration responses, finite element modelling and dynamic-based identification of the uncertain structural parameters. All the changes experienced by the structure suppose a high level of uncertainty, which affects material’s properties and structural schemes in relation to deterioration processes and the structural modifications. Hence, a rigorous updating process in the finite element model was necessary to approach the experimental data with the numeric calculations.

Keywords

Ambient vibration Dynamic characteristics Finite element model updating Historic bridge Operational modal analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Chang CC, Chang TYP, Zhang QW (2001) Ambient vibration of long-span cable-stayed bridge. J Bridg Eng 6(1):46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ercan E, Nuhoglu A (2014) Identification of historical Veziragasi aqueduct using the operational modal analysis. Sci World J 2014:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marques F, Moutinho C, Magalhães F, Caetano E, Cunha Á (2014) Analysis of dynamic and fatigue effects in an old metallic riveted bridge. J Constr Steel Res 99:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gentile C, Saisi A (2013) Operational modal testing of historic structures at different levels of excitation. Construct Build Mater 48:1273–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altunisik AC, Bayraktar A, Sevim B, Birinci F (2011) Vibration-based operational modal analysis of the Mikron historic arch bridge after restoration. Civ Eng Environ Syst 28(3):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brencich A, Sabia D (2008) Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: the <i> Tanaro Bridge. Constr Build Mater 22(10):2087–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maia NMM, e Silva JMM (1997) Theoretical and experimental modal analysis. Research Studies Press, TauntonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farrar CR, James GH III (1997) System identification from ambient vibration measurements on a bridge. J Sound Vib 205(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    James III GH, Carne TG, Lauffer JP (1993) The natural excitation technique (NExT) for modal parameter extraction from operating wind turbines. NASA STI/Recon technical report No, 93, 28603Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. García-Macías
    • 1
  • R. Castro-Triguero
    • 1
  • R. Gallego
    • 2
  • J. Carretero
    • 3
  1. 1.University of CordobaCordobaSpain
  2. 2.University of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.INECOGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations