Advertisement

A Testing-Based Approach to Ensure the Safety of Shared Resource Concurrent Systems

  • Lars-Åke Fredlund
  • Ángel Herranz
  • Julio Mariño
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8938)

Abstract

The paper describes an approach to testing a class of safety-critical concurrent systems implemented using shared resources.

Shared resources are characterized using a declarative specification, from which both an efficient implementation can be derived, and which serves as the first approximation of the state-based test model used for testing an implementation of the resource.

In this article the methodology is illustrated by applying it to the task of testing the safety-critical software that controls an automated shipping plant, specified as a shared resource, which serves shipping orders using a set of autonomous robots. The operations of the robots are governed by a set of rules limiting the weight of robots, and their cargo, to ensure safe operations.

Keywords

Shared Resource Resource Specification Initial Model State Boolean Property Declarative Specification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong, J., Virding, R., Wikström, C., Williams, M.: Concurrent Programming in Erlang. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arts, T., Hughes, J., Johansson, J., Wiger, U.T.: Testing telecoms software with quviq QuickCheck. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Erlang, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 2–10 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cesarini, F., Thompson, S.: Erlang Programming - A Concurrent Approach to Software Development. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Claessen, K., Hughes, J.: Quickcheck: a lightweight tool for random testing of haskell programs. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, ICFP 2000, pp. 268–279. ACM, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herranz, Á., Mariño, J.: A verified implementation of priority monitors in Java. In: Beckert, B., Damiani, F., Gurov, D. (eds.) FoVeOOS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7421, pp. 160–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herranz, A., Mariño, J., Carro, M., Moreno Navarro, J.J.: Modeling concurrent systems with shared resources. In: Alpuente, M., Cook, B., Joubert, C. (eds.) FMICS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5825, pp. 102–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Svenningsson, R., Johansson, R., Arts, T., Norell, U.: Testing AUTOSAR basic software models with quickcheck. In: Pavese, F., Bár, M., Filtz, J.-R., Forbes, A.B., Pendrill, L., Shirono, K. (eds.) Advanced Mathematical And Computational Tools In Metrology And Testing IX, pp. 391–395. World Scientific, Singapore (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars-Åke Fredlund
    • 1
  • Ángel Herranz
    • 1
  • Julio Mariño
    • 1
  1. 1.Babel GroupUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations